These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28827269)

  • 1. Redundant systematic reviews on the same topic in surgery: a study protocol for a meta-epidemiological investigation.
    Katsura M; Kuriyama A; Tada M; Yamamoto K; Furukawa TA
    BMJ Open; 2017 Aug; 7(8):e017411. PubMed ID: 28827269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High variability in results and methodological quality among overlapping systematic reviews on the same topics in surgery: a meta-epidemiological study.
    Katsura M; Kuriyama A; Tada M; Tsujimoto Y; Luo Y; Yamamoto K; So R; Aga M; Matsushima K; Fukuma S; Furukawa TA
    Br J Surg; 2021 Dec; 108(12):1521-1529. PubMed ID: 34791075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Methodological characteristics and treatment effect sizes in oral health randomised controlled trials: Is there a relationship? Protocol for a meta-epidemiological study.
    Saltaji H; Armijo-Olivo S; Cummings GG; Amin M; Flores-Mir C
    BMJ Open; 2014 Feb; 4(2):e004527. PubMed ID: 24568962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in Saudi journals from 1997 to 2017.
    Natto ZS; AlGhamdi DS
    Saudi Med J; 2019 May; 40(5):426-431. PubMed ID: 31056617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Coronavirus disease (COVID 2019): protocol for a living overview of systematic reviews.
    Lu C; Lu T; Pan B; Wang Q; Hou L; Zhang Q; Wang Y; Wang Y; Li X; Ruan Y; Chen L; Lai H; Qin T; Ge L; Yan K
    Ann Palliat Med; 2021 Feb; 10(2):1488-1493. PubMed ID: 33353349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Erectile Dysfunction Treatment and Management Published in the Sexual Medicine Literature.
    Greenberg DR; Richardson MT; Tijerina JD; Bass MB; Eisenberg ML
    J Sex Med; 2019 Mar; 16(3):394-401. PubMed ID: 30773501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scientific evidence of acupuncture for post-stroke motor impairment: protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Yu P; Liu Y; Wang H; Peng T
    BMJ Open; 2024 Sep; 14(9):e086427. PubMed ID: 39289014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses assessing the treatment and management of male infertility.
    Bhambhvani HP; Greenberg DR; Eisenberg ML
    Andrology; 2021 May; 9(3):801-809. PubMed ID: 33432772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical Epidemiology in China series. Paper 3: The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published by China' researchers in English-language is higher than those published in Chinese-language.
    Cao L; Yao L; Hui X; Li J; Zhang X; Li M; Feng Z; Ren M; Xian K; Sun Y; Liu Y; Luo X; Chen Y; Yang K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Dec; 140():178-188. PubMed ID: 34418547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Published in High-Impact Otolaryngology Journals.
    Martinez-Monedero R; Danielian A; Angajala V; Dinalo JE; Kezirian EJ
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 Nov; 163(5):892-905. PubMed ID: 32450783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating characteristics of PROSPERO records as predictors of eventual publication of non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study protocol.
    Ruano J; Gómez-García F; Gay-Mimbrera J; Aguilar-Luque M; Fernández-Rueda JL; Fernández-Chaichio J; Alcalde-Mellado P; Carmona-Fernandez PJ; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Viguera-Guerra I; Franco-García F; Cárdenas-Aranzana M; Romero JLH; Gonzalez-Padilla M; Isla-Tejera B; Garcia-Nieto AV
    Syst Rev; 2018 Mar; 7(1):43. PubMed ID: 29523200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Association between statistical significance and time to publication among systematic reviews: a study protocol for a meta-epidemiological investigation.
    Tsujimoto Y; Tsutsumi Y; Kataoka Y; Tsujimoto H; Yamamoto Y; Papola D; Guyatt GH; Fukuhara S; Furukawa TA
    BMJ Open; 2017 Oct; 7(10):e018856. PubMed ID: 29061634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews/meta-analyses of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome using AMSTAR2.
    Guan X; Lao Y; Wang J; Wang Y; Bai Y; Li X; Liu S; Li Z; Li F; Dong Z
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Nov; 23(1):281. PubMed ID: 38012566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mapping of systematic reviews on traditional medicine across health conditions: a protocol for a systematic map.
    Ang L; Song E; Jong MC; Alræk T; Wider B; Choi TY; Jun JH; Lee B; Choi Y; Lee HW; Yang C; Lee MS
    BMJ Open; 2023 Dec; 13(12):e075215. PubMed ID: 38081666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conflict of Evidence: Resolving Discrepancies When Findings from Randomized Controlled Trials and Meta-analyses Disagree.
    Sylvester RJ; Canfield SE; Lam TB; Marconi L; MacLennan S; Yuan Y; MacLennan G; Norrie J; Omar MI; Bruins HM; Hernández V; Plass K; Van Poppel H; N'Dow J
    Eur Urol; 2017 May; 71(5):811-819. PubMed ID: 27914898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Examining the evidence on complementary and alternative therapies to treat peripartum depression in pregnant or postpartum women: study protocol for an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Dubreucq J; Kamperman AM; Al-Maach N; Bramer WM; Pacheco F; Ganho-Avila A; Lambregtse-van den Berg M
    BMJ Open; 2022 Nov; 12(11):e057327. PubMed ID: 36410814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nearly 80 systematic reviews were published each day: Observational study on trends in epidemiology and reporting over the years 2000-2019.
    Hoffmann F; Allers K; Rombey T; Helbach J; Hoffmann A; Mathes T; Pieper D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Oct; 138():1-11. PubMed ID: 34091022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the impact of including non-randomised studies of interventions in meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials: a protocol for a meta-epidemiological study.
    Yao M; Wang Y; Busse JW; Briel M; Mei F; Li G; Zou K; Li L; Sun X
    BMJ Open; 2023 Jul; 13(7):e073232. PubMed ID: 37495391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The score after 10 years of registration of systematic review protocols.
    van der Braak K; Ghannad M; Orelio C; Heus P; Damen JAA; Spijker R; Robinson K; Lund H; Hooft L
    Syst Rev; 2022 Sep; 11(1):191. PubMed ID: 36064610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.