These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28828013)

  • 1. Retentive Strength of Orthodontic Bands Cemented with Amorphous Calcium Phosphate-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement: An In-Vitro Study.
    Heravi F; Omidkhoda M; Koohestanian N; Hooshmand T; Bagheri H; Ghaffari N
    J Dent (Tehran); 2017 Jan; 14(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 28828013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of retentive groove, sandblasting and cement type on the retentive strength of stainless steel crowns in primary second molars--an in vitro comparative study.
    Veerabadhran MM; Reddy V; Nayak UA; Rao AP; Sundaram MA
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 22565513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro comparison of orthodontic band cements.
    Millett DT; Duff S; Morrison L; Cummings A; Gilmour WH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Jan; 123(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 12532057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of environmental pressure changes on the retentive strength of cements for orthodontic bands.
    Gulve MN; Gulve ND; Shinde R; Kolhe SJ
    Diving Hyperb Med; 2012 Jun; 42(2):78-81. PubMed ID: 22828814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer for band cementation? An in vitro study.
    Millett DT; Doubleday B; Alatsaris M; Love J; Wood D; Luther F; Devine D
    J Orthod; 2005 Mar; 32(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 15784942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Resin-modified glass ionomer, modified composite or conventional glass ionomer for band cementation?--an in vitro evaluation.
    Millett DT; Cummings A; Letters S; Roger E; Love J
    Eur J Orthod; 2003 Dec; 25(6):609-14. PubMed ID: 14700267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Amorphous calcium phosphate-containing orthodontic cement for band fixation: an in vitro study.
    Uysal T; Yilmaz E; Ramoglu SI
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 20552099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of dentin desensitizers and cementing agents on retention of full crowns using standardized crown preparations.
    Yim NH; Rueggeberg FA; Caughman WF; Gardner FM; Pashley DH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Apr; 83(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 10756297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro retentive strength of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns using different luting agents.
    Ernst CP; Cohnen U; Stender E; Willershausen B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):551-8. PubMed ID: 15942616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An evaluation of retention and marginal seating of Ni-Cr alloy cast restorations using three different luting cements: an in vitro study.
    Pattanaik BK; Nagda SJ
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 22842244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of surface treatment and type of cement on the retentive strength of orthodontic bands on gold alloy crowns.
    Youn YA; Lee YK; Lee DY; Kim NY; Lim YK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Dec; 132(6):728.e1-6. PubMed ID: 18068585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Various Glass Ionomer Cements to Dentin of Primary Teeth: An
    Somani R; Jaidka S; Singh DJ; Sibal GK
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 9(3):192-196. PubMed ID: 27843248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The retention of complete crowns prepared with three different tapers and luted with four different cements.
    Zidan O; Ferguson GC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jun; 89(6):565-71. PubMed ID: 12815350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retention of orthodontic bands with new fluoride-releasing cements.
    Norris DS; McInnes-Ledoux P; Schwaninger B; Weinberg R
    Am J Orthod; 1986 Mar; 89(3):206-11. PubMed ID: 3513596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retention of orthodontic bands with three different cements.
    Kocadereli I; Ciger S
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1995; 19(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 7577731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    Pathak S; Shashibhushan KK; Poornima P; Reddy VS
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 9(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 27843249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Effect of Temporary Cement Cleaning Methods on the Retention of Crowns.
    Song MY; An H; Park EJ
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e210-e215. PubMed ID: 28598530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of recementation on crown retention.
    Ayad MF; Rosenstiel SF; Woelfel JB
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 9709609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of effect of desensitizing agents on the retention of crowns cemented with luting agents: an in vitro study.
    Jalandar SS; Pandharinath DS; Arun K; Smita V
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2012 Aug; 4(3):127-33. PubMed ID: 22977719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative evaluation of effect of polymerizable and non-polymerizable desensitizing agents on crown-retentive-strength of zinc-phosphate, glass-ionomer and compomer cements.
    Patil PG; Parkhedkar RD; Patil SP; Bhowmik HS
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2012 Sep; 20(3):102-10. PubMed ID: 23101176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.