These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28828574)
1. Diverse Approaches to Implement and Monitor River Restoration: A Comparative Perspective in France and Germany. Morandi B; Kail J; Toedter A; Wolter C; Piégay H Environ Manage; 2017 Nov; 60(5):931-946. PubMed ID: 28828574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How is success or failure in river restoration projects evaluated? Feedback from French restoration projects. Morandi B; Piégay H; Lamouroux N; Vaudor L J Environ Manage; 2014 May; 137():178-88. PubMed ID: 24675435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Coupling systematic planning and expert judgement enhances the efficiency of river restoration. Langhans SD; Gessner J; Hermoso V; Wolter C Sci Total Environ; 2016 Aug; 560-561():266-73. PubMed ID: 27101463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Flow Restoration in the Columbia River Basin: An Evaluation of a Flow Restoration Accounting Framework. McCoy AL; Holmes SR; Boisjolie BA Environ Manage; 2018 Mar; 61(3):506-519. PubMed ID: 28856404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Public support for river restoration. A mixed-method study into local residents' support for and framing of river management and ecological restoration in the Dutch floodplains. Buijs AE J Environ Manage; 2009 Jun; 90(8):2680-9. PubMed ID: 19303194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of river restoration on life-history strategies in fish communities. Manfrin A; Teurlincx S; Lorenz AW; Haase P; Marttila M; Syrjänen JT; Thomas G; Stoll S Sci Total Environ; 2019 May; 663():486-495. PubMed ID: 30716640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pressures at larger spatial scales strongly influence the ecological status of heavily modified river water bodies in Germany. Kail J; Wolter C Sci Total Environ; 2013 Jun; 454-455():40-50. PubMed ID: 23542480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. River restoration success: a question of perception. Jähnig SC; Lorenz AW; Hering D; Antons C; Sundermann A; Jedicke E; Haase P Ecol Appl; 2011 Sep; 21(6):2007-15. PubMed ID: 21939040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Integrated modeling of agricultural scenarios (IMAS) to support pesticide action plans: the case of the Coulonge drinking water catchment area (SW France). Vernier F; Leccia-Phelpin O; Lescot JM; Minette S; Miralles A; Barberis D; Scordia C; Kuentz-Simonet V; Tonneau JP Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Mar; 24(8):6923-6950. PubMed ID: 27726081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. River restoration in Spain: theoretical and practical approach in the context of the European water framework directive. González Del Tánago M; García de Jalón D; Román M Environ Manage; 2012 Jul; 50(1):123-39. PubMed ID: 22569704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Delineation of water ecological restoration zoning from a multi-dimensional perspective: A case study in Hechi, a typical karst region]. Gao MW; Hu YC; Liu XW; Liang MY; Kong FJ; Bai YP Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2024 Jun; 35(6):1661-1670. PubMed ID: 39235025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. River restoration: the fuzzy logic of repairing reaches to reverse catchment scale degradation. Bernhardt ES; Palmer MA Ecol Appl; 2011 Sep; 21(6):1926-31. PubMed ID: 21939034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Restoring ecological integrity in highly regulated rivers: the role of baseline data and analytical references. Downs PW; Singer MS; Orr BK; Diggory ZE; Church TC; Stella JC Environ Manage; 2011 Oct; 48(4):847-64. PubMed ID: 21853279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. River habitat monitoring and assessment in Germany. Kamp U; Binder W; Hölzl K Environ Monit Assess; 2007 Apr; 127(1-3):209-26. PubMed ID: 17058007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Who Really Wants an Ambitious Large-Scale Restoration of the Seine Estuary? A Strategic Analysis of a Science-Policy Interface Locked in a Stalemate. Coreau A; Narcy JB; Lumbroso S Environ Manage; 2018 May; 61(5):834-847. PubMed ID: 29470602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Review of national methodologies for rivers' hydromorphological assessment: A comparative approach in France, Romania, and Croatia. Zaharia L; Ioana-Toroimac G; Moroşanu GA; Gălie AC; Moldoveanu M; Čanjevac I; Belleudy P; Plantak M; Buzjak N; Bočić N; Legout C; Bigot S; Ciobotaru N J Environ Manage; 2018 Jul; 217():735-746. PubMed ID: 29656254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Restoration of riparian vegetation: A global review of implementation and evaluation approaches in the international, peer-reviewed literature. González E; Sher AA; Tabacchi E; Masip A; Poulin M J Environ Manage; 2015 Aug; 158():85-94. PubMed ID: 25974311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of water shortage in Kabul River network on the plain areas of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Nafees M; Ahmad F; Butt MN; Khurshed M Environ Monit Assess; 2018 May; 190(6):359. PubMed ID: 29799074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A decision framework for possible remediation of contaminated sediments in the River Kymijoki, Finland. Verta M; Kiviranta H; Salo S; Malve O; Korhonen M; Verkasalo PK; Ruokojärvi P; Rossi E; Hanski A; Päätalo K; Vartiainen T Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2009 Jan; 16(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 18941816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Priority targets for environmental research in the Sinos River basin. Spilki FR; Tundisi JG Braz J Biol; 2010 Dec; 70(4 Suppl):1245-7. PubMed ID: 21225166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]