These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28828574)
21. A newly developed dispersal metric indicates the succession of benthic invertebrates in restored rivers. Li F; Sundermann A; Stoll S; Haase P Sci Total Environ; 2016 Nov; 569-570():1570-1578. PubMed ID: 27443455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Application of science-based restoration planning to a desert river system. Laub BG; Jimenez J; Budy P Environ Manage; 2015 Jun; 55(6):1246-61. PubMed ID: 25850614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Assessing watercourse quality: challenges in implementing European and Swiss legal frameworks. Milano M; Chèvre N; Reynard E Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Jan; 25(1):805-823. PubMed ID: 29063406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. River restoration success depends on the species pool of the immediate surroundings. Sundermann A; Stoll S; Haase P Ecol Appl; 2011 Sep; 21(6):1962-71. PubMed ID: 21939037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Development of a HEC-HMS-based watershed modeling system for identification, allocation, and optimization of reservoirs in a river basin. Srinivas R; Singh AP; Deshmukh A Environ Monit Assess; 2017 Dec; 190(1):31. PubMed ID: 29260336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Assessing Restoration Effects on River Hydromorphology Using the Process-based Morphological Quality Index in Eight European River Reaches. Belletti B; Nardi L; Rinaldi M; Poppe M; Brabec K; Bussettini M; Comiti F; Gielczewski M; Golfieri B; Hellsten S; Kail J; Marchese E; Marcinkowski P; Okruszko T; Paillex A; Schirmer M; Stelmaszczyk M; Surian N Environ Manage; 2018 Jan; 61(1):69-84. PubMed ID: 29150720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Phosphorus losses from agricultural areas in river basins: effects and uncertainties of targeted mitigation measures. Kronvang B; Bechmann M; Lundekvam H; Behrendt H; Rubaek GH; Schoumans OF; Syversen N; Andersen HE; Hoffmann CC J Environ Qual; 2005; 34(6):2129-44. PubMed ID: 16275713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Assessing societal impacts when planning restoration of large alluvial rivers: a case study of the Sacramento River project, California. Golet GH; Roberts MD; Larsen EW; Luster RA; Unger R; Werner G; White GG Environ Manage; 2006 Jun; 37(6):862-79. PubMed ID: 16523370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluating success criteria and project monitoring in river enhancement within an adaptive management framework. O'Donnell TK; Galat DL Environ Manage; 2008 Jan; 41(1):90-105. PubMed ID: 17805923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Time is no healer: increasing restoration age does not lead to improved benthic invertebrate communities in restored river reaches. Leps M; Sundermann A; Tonkin JD; Lorenz AW; Haase P Sci Total Environ; 2016 Jul; 557-558():722-32. PubMed ID: 27046138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Gravel replenishment and active-channel widening for braided-river restoration: The case of the Upper Drac River (France). Brousse G; Liébault F; Arnaud-Fassetta G; Breilh B; Tacon S Sci Total Environ; 2021 Apr; 766():142517. PubMed ID: 33071136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Water quality assessment of a small peri-urban river using low and high frequency monitoring. Ivanovsky A; Criquet J; Dumoulin D; Alary C; Prygiel J; Duponchel L; Billon G Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2016 May; 18(5):624-37. PubMed ID: 27145836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Sustainable water quality management framework and a strategy planning system for a river basin. Chen CH; Liu WL; Leu HG Environ Manage; 2006 Dec; 38(6):952-73. PubMed ID: 16990981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Restoration as mitigation: analysis of stream mitigation for coal mining impacts in southern Appalachia. Palmer MA; Hondula KL Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Sep; 48(18):10552-60. PubMed ID: 25133756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Mass balance and decontamination times of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in rural nested catchments of an early industrialized region (Seine River basin, France). Gateuille D; Evrard O; Lefevre I; Moreau-Guigon E; Alliot F; Chevreuil M; Mouchel JM Sci Total Environ; 2014 Feb; 470-471():608-17. PubMed ID: 24176709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Assessment of river alteration using a new hydromorphological index. Gündüz O; Şimşek C Environ Monit Assess; 2021 Mar; 193(4):226. PubMed ID: 33772363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Design of a new monitoring network and first testing of new biological assessment methods according to water framework directive. Sommerhäuser M; Scharner C; Schimmer H; Schindler A; Plantikow K; Vietoris F J Environ Monit; 2007 Sep; 9(9):966-9. PubMed ID: 17726557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of ecological restoration and climate change on ecosystems: a case study in the Three-Rivers Headwater Region, China. Jiang C; Zhang L Environ Monit Assess; 2016 Jun; 188(6):382. PubMed ID: 27240853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Scale-dependent effects of river habitat quality on benthic invertebrate communities--Implications for stream restoration practice. Stoll S; Breyer P; Tonkin JD; Früh D; Haase P Sci Total Environ; 2016 May; 553():495-503. PubMed ID: 26930320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Assessing the impact of changes in landuse and management practices on the diffuse pollution and retention of nitrate in a riparian floodplain. Krause S; Jacobs J; Voss A; Bronstert A; Zehe E Sci Total Environ; 2008 Jan; 389(1):149-64. PubMed ID: 17915291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]