464 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28828640)
1. The performance of 3D ABUS versus HHUS in the visualisation and BI-RADS characterisation of breast lesions in a large cohort of 1,886 women.
Vourtsis A; Kachulis A
Eur Radiol; 2018 Feb; 28(2):592-601. PubMed ID: 28828640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of 3D-Automated Breast Ultrasound With Handheld Breast Ultrasound Regarding Detection and BI-RADS Characterization of Lesions in Dense Breasts: A Study of 592 Cases.
Güldogan N; Yılmaz E; Arslan A; Küçükkaya F; Atila N; Arıbal E
Acad Radiol; 2022 Aug; 29(8):1143-1148. PubMed ID: 34955365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study.
Wenkel E; Heckmann M; Heinrich M; Schwab SA; Uder M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz WA; Janka R
Rofo; 2008 Sep; 180(9):804-8. PubMed ID: 18704878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic performance of automated breast ultrasound and handheld ultrasound in women with dense breasts.
Jia M; Lin X; Zhou X; Yan H; Chen Y; Liu P; Bao L; Li A; Basu P; Qiao Y; Sankaranarayanan R
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Jun; 181(3):589-597. PubMed ID: 32338323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The diagnostic performance of automated versus handheld breast ultrasound and mammography in symptomatic outpatient women: a multicenter, cross-sectional study in China.
Lin X; Jia M; Zhou X; Bao L; Chen Y; Liu P; Feng R; Zhang X; Zhu L; Wang H; Zhu Y; Tang G; Feng W; Li A; Qiao Y
Eur Radiol; 2021 Feb; 31(2):947-957. PubMed ID: 32852589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automated breast ultrasound compared to hand-held ultrasound in surveillance after breast-conserving surgery.
Depretto C; Liguori A; Primolevo A; Di Cosimo S; Cartia F; Ferranti C; Scaperrotta GP
Tumori; 2021 Apr; 107(2):132-138. PubMed ID: 32552398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes of Return to Routine Screening for BI-RADS 3 Lesions Detected at Supplemental Automated Whole-Breast Ultrasound in Women With Dense Breasts: A Prospective Study.
Barr RG; DeSivestri A; Golatta M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Dec; 217(6):1313-1321. PubMed ID: 34259039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Potential of Adding Mammography to Handheld Ultrasound or Automated Breast Ultrasound to Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies in BI-RADS Ultrasound Category 4a: A Multicenter Hospital-Based Study in China.
Ren W; Zhao X; Zhao X; Yan H; Hu S; Qiao Y; Xu Z; Zhao F
Curr Oncol; 2023 Mar; 30(3):3301-3314. PubMed ID: 36975464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dependability of Automated Breast Ultrasound (ABUS) in Assessing Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Category and Size of Malignant Breast Lesions Compared with Handheld Ultrasound (HHUS) and Mammography (MG).
Chen H; Han M; Jing H; Liu Z; Shang H; Wang Q; Cheng W
Int J Gen Med; 2021; 14():9193-9202. PubMed ID: 34880658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automated Breast Ultrasound in Breast Cancer Screening of Women With Dense Breasts: Reader Study of Mammography-Negative and Mammography-Positive Cancers.
Giger ML; Inciardi MF; Edwards A; Papaioannou J; Drukker K; Jiang Y; Brem R; Brown JB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jun; 206(6):1341-50. PubMed ID: 27043979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A multicenter hospital-based diagnosis study of automated breast ultrasound system in detecting breast cancer among Chinese women.
Zhang X; Lin X; Tan Y; Zhu Y; Wang H; Feng R; Tang G; Zhou X; Li A; Qiao Y
Chin J Cancer Res; 2018 Apr; 30(2):231-239. PubMed ID: 29861608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic accuracy of supplemental three-dimensional breast ultrasound in the work-up of BI-RADS 0 screening recalls.
den Dekker BM; Broeders MJM; Meeuwis C; Setz-Pels W; Venmans A; van Gils CH; Pijnappel RM
Insights Imaging; 2024 May; 15(1):131. PubMed ID: 38816526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of automated breast ultrasonography to handheld ultrasonography in detecting and diagnosing breast lesions.
Jeh SK; Kim SH; Choi JJ; Jung SS; Choe BJ; Park S; Park MS
Acta Radiol; 2016 Feb; 57(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 25766727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of automated versus hand-held breast US in supplemental screening in asymptomatic women with dense breasts: is there a difference regarding woman preference, lesion detection and lesion characterization?
Tutar B; Esen Icten G; Guldogan N; Kara H; Arıkan AE; Tutar O; Uras C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 May; 301(5):1257-1265. PubMed ID: 32215718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interpretation of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) with and without knowledge of mammography: a reader performance study.
Skaane P; Gullien R; Eben EB; Sandhaug M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Stoeblen F
Acta Radiol; 2015 Apr; 56(4):404-12. PubMed ID: 24682405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison and risk factors analysis of multiple breast cancer screening methods in the evaluation of breast non-mass-like lesions.
Zhang J; Cai L; Pan X; Chen L; Chen M; Yan D; Liu J; Luo L
BMC Med Imaging; 2022 Nov; 22(1):202. PubMed ID: 36404330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A multicenter, hospital-based and non-inferiority study for diagnostic efficacy of automated whole breast ultrasound for breast cancer in China.
Xin Y; Zhang X; Yang Y; Chen Y; Wang Y; Zhou X; Qiao Y
Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):13902. PubMed ID: 34230562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability of automated versus handheld breast ultrasound examinations of suspicious breast masses.
Yun G; Kim SM; Yun B; Ahn HS; Jang M
Ultrasonography; 2019 Jul; 38(3):264-271. PubMed ID: 30999717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recall rate of screening ultrasound with automated breast volumetric scanning (ABVS) in women with dense breasts: a first quarter experience.
Arleo EK; Saleh M; Ionescu D; Drotman M; Min RJ; Hentel K
Clin Imaging; 2014; 38(4):439-444. PubMed ID: 24768327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
