These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28831072)

  • 1. Working memory accuracy for multiple targets is driven by reward expectation and stimulus contrast with different time-courses.
    Klink PC; Jeurissen D; Theeuwes J; Denys D; Roelfsema PR
    Sci Rep; 2017 Aug; 7(1):9082. PubMed ID: 28831072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Time-resolved neuroimaging of visual short term memory consolidation by post-perceptual attention shifts.
    Hecht M; Thiemann U; Freitag CM; Bender S
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 125():964-977. PubMed ID: 26571051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reward influences the allocation but not the availability of resources in visual working memory.
    Brissenden JA; Adkins TJ; Hsu YT; Lee TG
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Jul; 152(7):1825-1839. PubMed ID: 37079832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reward associations impact both iconic and visual working memory.
    Infanti E; Hickey C; Turatto M
    Vision Res; 2015 Feb; 107():22-9. PubMed ID: 25481632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Value-driven attentional capture is modulated by the contents of working memory: An EEG study.
    Hinault T; Blacker KJ; Gormley M; Anderson BA; Courtney SM
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2019 Apr; 19(2):253-267. PubMed ID: 30460482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of napping on memory for future-relevant stimuli: Prioritization among multiple salience cues.
    Bennion KA; Payne JD; Kensinger EA
    Behav Neurosci; 2016 Jun; 130(3):281-9. PubMed ID: 27214500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. No evidence that the retro-cue benefit requires reallocation of memory resources.
    Lin YT; Fougnie D
    Cognition; 2022 Dec; 229():105230. PubMed ID: 36007468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reward modulation of prefrontal and visual association cortex during an incentive working memory task.
    Krawczyk DC; Gazzaley A; D'Esposito M
    Brain Res; 2007 Apr; 1141():168-77. PubMed ID: 17320835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Previously Reward-Associated Stimuli Capture Spatial Attention in the Absence of Changes in the Corresponding Sensory Representations as Measured with MEG.
    Tankelevitch L; Spaak E; Rushworth MFS; Stokes MG
    J Neurosci; 2020 Jun; 40(26):5033-5050. PubMed ID: 32366722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. To be or not to be relevant: Comparing short- and long-term consequences across working memory prioritization procedures.
    Jeanneret S; Bartsch LM; Vergauwe E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Jul; 85(5):1486-1498. PubMed ID: 37127814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictive knowledge of stimulus relevance does not influence top-down suppression of irrelevant information in older adults.
    Zanto TP; Hennigan K; Ostberg M; Clapp WC; Gazzaley A
    Cortex; 2010 Apr; 46(4):564-74. PubMed ID: 19744649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contrasting effects of reward expectation on sensory and motor memories in primate prefrontal neurons.
    Amemori K; Sawaguchi T
    Cereb Cortex; 2006 Jul; 16(7):1002-15. PubMed ID: 16221932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Value-driven attentional and oculomotor capture during goal-directed, unconstrained viewing.
    Anderson BA; Yantis S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Nov; 74(8):1644-53. PubMed ID: 22810561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of visual salience on memory-based choices.
    Pooresmaeili A; Bach DR; Dolan RJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2014 Feb; 111(3):481-7. PubMed ID: 24198327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prioritization within visual working memory reflects a flexible focus of attention.
    Sandry J; Ricker TJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Aug; 82(6):2985-3004. PubMed ID: 32488643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of Stimulus Timing on the Acquisition of an Olfactory Working Memory Task in Head-Fixed Mice.
    Reuschenbach J; Reinert JK; Fu X; Fukunaga I
    J Neurosci; 2023 Apr; 43(17):3120-3130. PubMed ID: 36927573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the fate of non-cued mental representations in visuo-spatial working memory: Evidence by a retro-cuing paradigm.
    Schneider D; Mertes C; Wascher E
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Oct; 293():114-24. PubMed ID: 26196953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stimulus-driven attention and cognitive control during encoding: An event related brain potentials study.
    Wills-Conn K; Schroder H; Moser J; Ravizza S
    Biol Psychol; 2019 May; 144():1-10. PubMed ID: 30858074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unimodal and Bimodal Access to Sensory Working Memories by Auditory and Visual Impulses.
    Wolff MJ; Kandemir G; Stokes MG; Akyürek EG
    J Neurosci; 2020 Jan; 40(3):671-681. PubMed ID: 31754009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.