These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28831365)

  • 1. Comparative Study of Prepectoral and Subpectoral Expander-Based Breast Reconstruction and Clavien IIIb Score Outcomes.
    Bettinger LN; Waters LM; Reese SW; Kutner SE; Jacobs DI
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2017 Jul; 5(7):e1433. PubMed ID: 28831365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction Without the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix: A 3-Year Review.
    Poveromo LP; Franck P; Ellison A; Janhofer DE; Asadourian PA; Otterburn DM
    Ann Plast Surg; 2022 May; 88(3 Suppl 3):S205-S208. PubMed ID: 35513321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative study of pre- or subpectoral expander position with the fenestrated Acellular dermal matrix anterior coverage, on drainage volume and Seroma Formation after Non-Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
    Suh YC; Kim JK; Kim NR; Choi JS; Kim YJ; Lee JH; Jun YJ
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2021 Sep; 74(9):2237-2243. PubMed ID: 33618944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality of Life and Early Functional Evaluation in Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy: A Comparative Study Between Prepectoral Versus Dual-Plane Reconstruction.
    Caputo GG; Zingaretti N; Kiprianidis I; Zanfisi C; Domenici L; Parodi PC; Governa M
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Aug; 21(4):344-351. PubMed ID: 33308993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acellular Dermal Matrix-sparing Direct-to-implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study Including Cost Analysis.
    Viezel-Mathieu A; Alnaif N; Aljerian A; Safran T; Brabant G; Boileau JF; Dionisopoulos T
    Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Feb; 84(2):139-143. PubMed ID: 31335468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prepectoral Dual-Port Tissue Expander Placement: Can This Eliminate Suction Drain Use?
    Franck P; Chadab T; Poveromo L; Ellison A; Simmons R; Otterburn DM
    Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Jul; 85(S1 Suppl 1):S60-S62. PubMed ID: 32530848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Considerations for patient selection: Prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction.
    Yang JY; Kim CW; Lee JW; Kim SK; Lee SA; Hwang E
    Arch Plast Surg; 2019 Nov; 46(6):550-557. PubMed ID: 31775208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prepectoral and Subpectoral Tissue Expander-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of 90-Day Clinical and Health-Related Quality-of-Life Outcomes.
    Nelson JA; Shamsunder MG; Vorstenbosch J; Polanco TO; Matros E; Coriddi MR; Mehrara BJ; Allen RJ; Dayan JH; Disa JJ
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Apr; 149(4):607e-616e. PubMed ID: 35103644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reducing Expansion Visits in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of Prepectoral and Subpectoral Expander Placement.
    Wormer BA; Valmadrid AC; Ganesh Kumar N; Al Kassis S; Rankin TM; Kaoutzanis C; Higdon KK
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Aug; 144(2):276-286. PubMed ID: 31348326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prepectoral versus subpectoral two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction: U.S. medical center experience and narrative review.
    Escandón JM; Weiss A; Christiano JG; Langstein HN; Escandón L; Prieto PA; Gooch JC; Manrique OJ
    Ann Transl Med; 2023 Dec; 11(12):411. PubMed ID: 38213807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Safety Profile and Predictors of Aesthetic Outcomes After Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction With Meshed Acellular Dermal Matrix.
    Belmonte BM; Campbell CA
    Ann Plast Surg; 2021 Jun; 86(6S Suppl 5):S585-S592. PubMed ID: 34100818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with porcine acellular dermal matrix: a new technique for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy.
    Reitsamer R; Peintinger F
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Feb; 68(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 25455288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Revision Rates in Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Delayed-Immediate Autologous Breast Reconstruction.
    Patel AA; Cemaj SL; Martin SA; Cheesborough JE; Lee GK; Nazerali RS
    Ann Plast Surg; 2021 May; 86(5S Suppl 3):S409-S413. PubMed ID: 33833169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do we need acellular dermal matrix in prepectoral breast reconstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Nolan IT; Farajzadeh MM; Boyd CJ; Bekisz JM; Gibson EG; Salibian AA
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 Nov; 86():251-260. PubMed ID: 37793198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Matched-Pair Analysis of Prepectoral with Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction: Is There a Difference in Postoperative Complication Rate?
    Momeni A; Remington AC; Wan DC; Nguyen D; Gurtner GC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Oct; 144(4):801-807. PubMed ID: 31568276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do We Need Support in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction? Comparing Outcomes with and without ADM.
    Salibian AA; Bekisz JM; Kussie HC; Thanik VD; Levine JP; Choi M; Karp NS
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2021 Aug; 9(8):e3745. PubMed ID: 34386310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Early Functional Outcomes After Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Case-Matched Cohort Study.
    Schaeffer CV; Dassoulas KR; Thuman J; Campbell CA
    Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Jun; 82(6S Suppl 5):S399-S403. PubMed ID: 30570559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Strategies and considerations in selecting between subpectoral and prepectoral breast reconstruction.
    Salibian AA; Frey JD; Karp NS
    Gland Surg; 2019 Feb; 8(1):11-18. PubMed ID: 30842923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy in Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.
    Sinnott CJ; Persing SM; Pronovost M; Hodyl C; McConnell D; Ott Young A
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Oct; 25(10):2899-2908. PubMed ID: 29978367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of post-operative complications and adjuvant treatments following immediate prepectoral versus subpectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction without acellular dermal matrix.
    Bassi R; Jankowski C; Dabajuyo S; Burnier P; Coutant C; Vincent L
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2024 Apr; 95():402-410. PubMed ID: 39047335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.