These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28831554)

  • 1. The impact of patient-specific instrumentation on unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised controlled study.
    Alvand A; Khan T; Jenkins C; Rees JL; Jackson WF; Dodd CAF; Murray DW; Price AJ
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 Jun; 26(6):1662-1670. PubMed ID: 28831554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Superior femoral component alignment can be achieved with Oxford microplasty instrumentation after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
    Tu Y; Xue H; Ma T; Wen T; Yang T; Zhang H; Cai M
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Mar; 25(3):729-735. PubMed ID: 27225890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The John Insall Award: No Functional Benefit After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Performed With Patient-specific Instrumentation: A Randomized Trial.
    Ollivier M; Parratte S; Lunebourg A; Viehweger E; Argenson JN
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Jan; 474(1):60-8. PubMed ID: 25791446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient-specific instrumentation in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is reliable and accurate except for the tibial rotation.
    Kerens B; Leenders AM; Schotanus MGM; Boonen B; Tuinebreijer WE; Emans PJ; Jong B; Kort NP
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 Jun; 26(6):1823-1830. PubMed ID: 29282486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Revision of partial knee to total knee arthroplasty with use of patient-specific instruments results in acceptable femoral rotation.
    Schotanus MGM; Thijs E; Boonen B; Kerens B; Jong B; Kort NP
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 Jun; 26(6):1656-1661. PubMed ID: 28785788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A novel patient-specific instrument design can deliver robotic level accuracy in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
    Jones GG; Clarke S; Harris S; Jaere M; Aldalmani T; de Klee P; Cobb JP
    Knee; 2019 Dec; 26(6):1421-1428. PubMed ID: 31519328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do patient-specific instruments (PSI) for UKA allow non-expert surgeons to achieve the same saw cut accuracy as expert surgeons?
    Jones GG; Logishetty K; Clarke S; Collins R; Jaere M; Harris S; Cobb JP
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2018 Nov; 138(11):1601-1608. PubMed ID: 30178169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stability and alignment do not improve by using patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.
    Kosse NM; Heesterbeek PJC; Schimmel JJP; van Hellemondt GG; Wymenga AB; Defoort KC
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 Jun; 26(6):1792-1799. PubMed ID: 29181560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional analysis of accuracy of component positioning in total knee arthroplasty with patient specific and conventional instruments: A randomized controlled trial.
    De Vloo R; Pellikaan P; Dhollander A; Vander Sloten J
    Knee; 2017 Dec; 24(6):1469-1477. PubMed ID: 28943039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A high rate of tibial plateau fractures after early experience with patient-specific instrumentation for unicompartmental knee arthroplasties.
    Leenders AM; Schotanus MGM; Wind RJP; Borghans RAP; Kort NP
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 Nov; 26(11):3491-3498. PubMed ID: 29713783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Midterm clinical and radiographic outcomes of 115 consecutive patient-specific unicompartmental knee arthroplasties.
    Flury A; Hasler J; Dimitriou D; Antoniadis A; Finsterwald M; Helmy N
    Knee; 2019 Aug; 26(4):889-896. PubMed ID: 31182346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient-specific instrumentation improved mechanical alignment, while early clinical outcome was comparable to conventional instrumentation in TKA.
    Anderl W; Pauzenberger L; Kölblinger R; Kiesselbach G; Brandl G; Laky B; Kriegleder B; Heuberer P; Schwameis E
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Jan; 24(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 25326759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patient-specific instruments do not show advantage over conventional instruments in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at 2 year follow-up: a prospective, two-centre, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial.
    Leenders AM; Kort NP; Koenraadt KLM; van Geenen RCI; Most J; Kerens B; Boonen B; Schotanus MGM
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2022 Mar; 30(3):918-927. PubMed ID: 33570699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy and early outcomes in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty performed using patient specific instrumentation.
    Bell SW; Stoddard J; Bennett C; London NJ
    Knee; 2014; 21 Suppl 1():S33-6. PubMed ID: 25382366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Design improvement in patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty improved the accuracy of the tibial prosthetic alignment in the coronal and axial planes.
    Yamamura K; Minoda Y; Sugama R; Ohta Y; Nakamura S; Ueyama H; Nakamura H
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2020 May; 28(5):1560-1567. PubMed ID: 31240377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patient-Specific Instrumentation Does Not Affect Rotational Alignment of the Femoral Component and Perioperative Blood Loss in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial.
    Randelli PS; Menon A; Pasqualotto S; Zanini B; Compagnoni R; Cucchi D
    J Arthroplasty; 2019 Jul; 34(7):1374-1381.e1. PubMed ID: 30979672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Component alignment and clinical outcome following total knee arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial comparing an intramedullary alignment system with patient-specific instrumentation.
    Huijbregts HJ; Khan RJ; Fick DP; Hall MJ; Punwar SA; Sorensen E; Reid MJ; Vedove SD; Haebich S
    Bone Joint J; 2016 Aug; 98-B(8):1043-9. PubMed ID: 27482015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of implantation during computer-assisted minimally invasive Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a comparison with a conventional instrumented technique.
    Jung KA; Kim SJ; Lee SC; Hwang SH; Ahn NK
    Knee; 2010 Dec; 17(6):387-91. PubMed ID: 19945880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improved Accuracy of Component Positioning with Robotic-Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Data from a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study.
    Bell SW; Anthony I; Jones B; MacLean A; Rowe P; Blyth M
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Apr; 98(8):627-35. PubMed ID: 27098321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The efficacy and safety of patient-specific instrumentation versus conventional instrumentation for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Evidence from a meta-analysis.
    Wang H; Zhang L; Teng X
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2024 Jan; 103(3):e36484. PubMed ID: 38241557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.