These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28831851)

  • 1. An attributional life cycle assessment for an Italian residential multifamily building.
    Vitale P; Arena U
    Environ Technol; 2018 Dec; 39(23):3033-3045. PubMed ID: 28831851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Life cycle assessment of the end-of-life phase of a residential building.
    Vitale P; Arena N; Di Gregorio F; Arena U
    Waste Manag; 2017 Feb; 60():311-321. PubMed ID: 27742229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Life cycle assessment of construction and demolition waste management.
    Butera S; Christensen TH; Astrup TF
    Waste Manag; 2015 Oct; 44():196-205. PubMed ID: 26188610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Life cycle assessment of construction and demolition waste management in a large area of São Paulo State, Brazil.
    Rosado LP; Vitale P; Penteado CSG; Arena U
    Waste Manag; 2019 Feb; 85():477-489. PubMed ID: 30803603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A building information modeling-based tool for estimating building demolition waste and evaluating its environmental impacts.
    Su S; Li S; Ju J; Wang Q; Xu Z
    Waste Manag; 2021 Oct; 134():159-169. PubMed ID: 34419703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Building Material Use and Associated Environmental Impacts in China 2000-2015.
    Huang B; Zhao F; Fishman T; Chen WQ; Heeren N; Hertwich EG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Dec; 52(23):14006-14014. PubMed ID: 30411613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Construction and demolition waste indicators.
    Mália M; de Brito J; Pinheiro MD; Bravo M
    Waste Manag Res; 2013 Mar; 31(3):241-55. PubMed ID: 23315370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of different building shells - life cycle assessment.
    Rixrath D; Wartha C
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2016 Jul; 12(3):437-44. PubMed ID: 27332927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. GHG emissions and energy consumption of residential buildings-a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Fan Y; Fang C
    Environ Monit Assess; 2023 Jun; 195(7):885. PubMed ID: 37358677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Environmental performance of green building code and certification systems.
    Suh S; Tomar S; Leighton M; Kneifel J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014; 48(5):2551-60. PubMed ID: 24483287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Energy and environmental life cycle assessment of an institutional catering service: An Italian case study.
    Mistretta M; Caputo P; Cellura M; Cusenza MA
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Mar; 657():1150-1160. PubMed ID: 30677882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is selective demolition always a sustainable choice?
    Pantini S; Rigamonti L
    Waste Manag; 2020 Feb; 103():169-176. PubMed ID: 31887689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sustainable management and supply of natural and recycled aggregates in a medium-size integrated plant.
    Faleschini F; Zanini MA; Pellegrino C; Pasinato S
    Waste Manag; 2016 Mar; 49():146-155. PubMed ID: 26810029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Environmental performance of construction waste: Comparing three scenarios from a case study in Catalonia, Spain.
    Ortiz O; Pasqualino JC; Castells F
    Waste Manag; 2010 Apr; 30(4):646-54. PubMed ID: 20005694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Soil biotreatment effectiveness for reducing global warming potential from main polluting tillage operations in life cycle assessment phase.
    Naujokienė V; Šarauskis E; Bleizgys R; Sasnauskienė J
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jun; 671():805-817. PubMed ID: 30947054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative environmental assessment of natural and recycled aggregate concrete.
    Marinković S; Radonjanin V; Malešev M; Ignjatović I
    Waste Manag; 2010 Nov; 30(11):2255-64. PubMed ID: 20434898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Environmental Impact of Textile Reinforced Concrete Facades Compared to Conventional Solutions-LCA Case Study.
    Laiblová L; Pešta J; Kumar A; Hájek P; Fiala C; Vlach T; Kočí V
    Materials (Basel); 2019 Sep; 12(19):. PubMed ID: 31569478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of concrete and steel-prefabricated prefinished volumetric construction structures in Malaysia.
    Balasbaneh AT; Ramli MZ
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Dec; 27(34):43186-43201. PubMed ID: 32734541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biodiversity burdens in Spanish conventional and low-impact single-family homes.
    Izaola B; Akizu-Gardoki O
    Sci Total Environ; 2024 Jan; 909():168371. PubMed ID: 37956848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative environmental evaluation of construction waste management through different waste sorting systems in Hong Kong.
    Hossain MU; Wu Z; Poon CS
    Waste Manag; 2017 Nov; 69():325-335. PubMed ID: 28781157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.