These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Prior Exposure to Salient Win-Paired Cues in a Rat Gambling Task Increases Sensitivity to Cocaine Self-Administration and Suppresses Dopamine Efflux in Nucleus Accumbens: Support for the Reward Deficiency Hypothesis of Addiction. Ferland JN; Hynes TJ; Hounjet CD; Lindenbach D; Vonder Haar C; Adams WK; Phillips AG; Winstanley CA J Neurosci; 2019 Mar; 39(10):1842-1854. PubMed ID: 30626700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Exposure to conditions of uncertainty promotes the pursuit of amphetamine. Mascia P; Neugebauer NM; Brown J; Bubula N; Nesbitt KM; Kennedy RT; Vezina P Neuropsychopharmacology; 2019 Jan; 44(2):274-280. PubMed ID: 29875447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anticonvulsant medications attenuate amphetamine-induced deficits in behavioral inhibition but not decision making under risk on a rat gambling task. Tremblay M; Winstanley CA Behav Brain Res; 2016 Nov; 314():143-51. PubMed ID: 27515288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Chronic atomoxetine treatment during adolescence does not influence decision-making on a rodent gambling task, but does modulate amphetamine's effect on impulsive action in adulthood. Silveira MM; Murch WS; Clark L; Winstanley CA Behav Pharmacol; 2016 Jun; 27(4):350-63. PubMed ID: 26650252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differential effects of environmental enrichment, social-housing, and isolation-rearing on a rat gambling task: dissociations between impulsive action and risky decision-making. Zeeb FD; Wong AC; Winstanley CA Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2013 Jan; 225(2):381-95. PubMed ID: 22864967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Scopolamine and amphetamine produce similar decision-making deficits on a rat gambling task via independent pathways. Silveira MM; Malcolm E; Shoaib M; Winstanley CA Behav Brain Res; 2015 Mar; 281():86-95. PubMed ID: 25529186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perturbations in different forms of cost/benefit decision making induced by repeated amphetamine exposure. Floresco SB; Whelan JM Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2009 Aug; 205(2):189-201. PubMed ID: 19365622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term deficits in risky decision-making after traumatic brain injury on a rat analog of the Iowa gambling task. Shaver TK; Ozga JE; Zhu B; Anderson KG; Martens KM; Vonder Haar C Brain Res; 2019 Feb; 1704():103-113. PubMed ID: 30296430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pharmacological evidence of a cholinergic contribution to elevated impulsivity and risky decision-making caused by adding win-paired cues to a rat gambling task. Betts GD; Hynes TJ; Winstanley CA J Psychopharmacol; 2021 Jun; 35(6):701-712. PubMed ID: 33573446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dopamine D3 Receptors Modulate the Ability of Win-Paired Cues to Increase Risky Choice in a Rat Gambling Task. Barrus MM; Winstanley CA J Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 36(3):785-94. PubMed ID: 26791209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risky decision-making and ventral striatal dopamine responses to amphetamine: a positron emission tomography [(11)C]raclopride study in healthy adults. Oswald LM; Wand GS; Wong DF; Brown CH; Kuwabara H; Brašić JR Neuroimage; 2015 Jun; 113():26-36. PubMed ID: 25795343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Chronic exposure to a gambling-like schedule of reward predictive stimuli can promote sensitization to amphetamine in rats. Zack M; Featherstone RE; Mathewson S; Fletcher PJ Front Behav Neurosci; 2014; 8():36. PubMed ID: 24574987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk-prone individuals prefer the wrong options on a rat version of the Iowa Gambling Task. Rivalan M; Ahmed SH; Dellu-Hagedorn F Biol Psychiatry; 2009 Oct; 66(8):743-9. PubMed ID: 19482266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]