173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28832336)
1. Improving image quality for digital breast tomosynthesis: an automated detection and diffusion-based method for metal artifact reduction.
Lu Y; Chan HP; Wei J; Hadjiiski LM; Samala RK
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(19):7765-7783. PubMed ID: 28832336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A diffusion-based truncated projection artifact reduction method for iterative digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction.
Lu Y; Chan HP; Wei J; Hadjiiski LM
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Feb; 58(3):569-87. PubMed ID: 23318346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Image quality of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: effects of projection-view distributions.
Lu Y; Chan HP; Wei J; Goodsitt M; Carson PL; Hadjiiski L; Schmitz A; Eberhard JW; Claus BE
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5703-12. PubMed ID: 21992385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Voting strategy for artifact reduction in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Wu T; Moore RH; Kopans DB
Med Phys; 2006 Jul; 33(7):2461-71. PubMed ID: 16898449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. High-attenuation artifact reduction in breast tomosynthesis using a novel reconstruction algorithm.
Dustler M; Wicklein J; Förnvik H; Boita J; Bakic P; Lång K
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jul; 116():21-26. PubMed ID: 31153567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Segmented separable footprint projector for digital breast tomosynthesis and its application for subpixel reconstruction.
Zheng J; Fessler JA; Chan HP
Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):986-1001. PubMed ID: 28058719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A novel pre-processing technique for improving image quality in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Kim H; Lee T; Hong J; Sabir S; Lee JR; Choi YW; Kim HH; Chae EY; Cho S
Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):417-425. PubMed ID: 28032909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A new projection correction based voting strategy for breast calcification artifact reduction.
Tang H; Wang J; Sun L; Wang S; Xiang J; Xi Y; Chen Y; Jiang Y
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Sep; 68(18):. PubMed ID: 37582378
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Developing breast lesion detection algorithms for digital breast tomosynthesis: Leveraging false positive findings.
Hossain MB; Nishikawa RM; Lee J
Med Phys; 2022 Dec; 49(12):7596-7608. PubMed ID: 35916103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of a new image reconstruction method for digital breast tomosynthesis: effects on the visibility of breast lesions and breast density.
Krammer J; Zolotarev S; Hillman I; Karalis K; Stsepankou D; Vengrinovich V; Hesser J; M Svahn T
Br J Radiol; 2019 Nov; 92(1103):20190345. PubMed ID: 31453718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Deformable mapping technique to correlate lesions in digital breast tomosynthesis and automated breast ultrasound images.
Green CA; Goodsitt MM; Brock KK; Davis CL; Larson ED; Lau JH; Carson PL
Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4402-4417. PubMed ID: 30066340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. New reconstruction algorithm for digital breast tomosynthesis: better image quality for humans and computers.
Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Teuwen J; Vreemann S; Bouwman RW; van Engen RE; Karssemeijer N; Mann RM; Gubern-Merida A; Sechopoulos I
Acta Radiol; 2018 Sep; 59(9):1051-1059. PubMed ID: 29254355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving mass detection using combined feature representations from projection views and reconstructed volume of DBT and boosting based classification with feature selection.
Kim DH; Kim ST; Ro YM
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Nov; 60(22):8809-32. PubMed ID: 26529080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Artifact reduction methods for truncated projections in iterative breast tomosynthesis reconstruction.
Zhang Y; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Wei J; Zhou C; Hadjiiski LM
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(3):426-35. PubMed ID: 19478639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characterization of a constrained paired-view technique in iterative reconstruction for breast tomosynthesis.
Wu G; Mainprize JG; Yaffe MJ
Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101901. PubMed ID: 24089903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating the sensitivity of the optimization of acquisition geometry to the choice of reconstruction algorithm in digital breast tomosynthesis through a simulation study.
Zeng R; Park S; Bakic P; Myers KJ
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Feb; 60(3):1259-88. PubMed ID: 25591807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multi-domain features for reducing false positives in automated detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Zhang F; Wu S; Zhang C; Chen Q; Yang X; Jiang K; Zheng J
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1300-1308. PubMed ID: 30661242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of masses in digital breast tomosynthesis using complementary information of simulated projection.
Kim ST; Kim DH; Ro YM
Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):7043-58. PubMed ID: 26632059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications in multiscale bilateral filtering regularized reconstructed digital breast tomosynthesis volume.
Samala RK; Chan HP; Lu Y; Hadjiiski L; Wei J; Sahiner B; Helvie MA
Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):021901. PubMed ID: 24506622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A metal artifact reduction method for a dental CT based on adaptive local thresholding and prior image generation.
Hegazy MA; Cho MH; Lee SY
Biomed Eng Online; 2016 Nov; 15(1):119. PubMed ID: 27814775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
