392 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28833585)
1. Protein structure model refinement in CASP12 using short and long molecular dynamics simulations in implicit solvent.
Terashi G; Kihara D
Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):189-201. PubMed ID: 28833585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Protein structure modeling and refinement by global optimization in CASP12.
Hong SH; Joung I; Flores-Canales JC; Manavalan B; Cheng Q; Heo S; Kim JY; Lee SY; Nam M; Joo K; Lee IH; Lee SJ; Lee J
Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1():122-135. PubMed ID: 29159837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Simultaneous refinement of inaccurate local regions and overall structure in the CASP12 protein model refinement experiment.
Lee GR; Heo L; Seok C
Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1():168-176. PubMed ID: 29044810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What makes it difficult to refine protein models further via molecular dynamics simulations?
Heo L; Feig M
Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):177-188. PubMed ID: 28975670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Refinement of protein structure homology models via long, all-atom molecular dynamics simulations.
Raval A; Piana S; Eastwood MP; Dror RO; Shaw DE
Proteins; 2012 Aug; 80(8):2071-9. PubMed ID: 22513870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Driven to near-experimental accuracy by refinement via molecular dynamics simulations.
Heo L; Arbour CF; Feig M
Proteins; 2019 Dec; 87(12):1263-1275. PubMed ID: 31197841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of the model refinement category in CASP12.
Hovan L; Oleinikovas V; Yalinca H; Kryshtafovych A; Saladino G; Gervasio FL
Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):152-167. PubMed ID: 29071750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the template-based modeling in CASP12.
Kryshtafovych A; Monastyrskyy B; Fidelis K; Moult J; Schwede T; Tramontano A
Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):321-334. PubMed ID: 29159950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of hard target modeling in CASP12 reveals an emerging role of alignment-based contact prediction methods.
Abriata LA; Tamò GE; Monastyrskyy B; Kryshtafovych A; Dal Peraro M
Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1():97-112. PubMed ID: 29139163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of protein assembly prediction in CASP12.
Lafita A; Bliven S; Kryshtafovych A; Bertoni M; Monastyrskyy B; Duarte JM; Schwede T; Capitani G
Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):247-256. PubMed ID: 29071742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Protein structure prediction using Rosetta in CASP12.
Ovchinnikov S; Park H; Kim DE; DiMaio F; Baker D
Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):113-121. PubMed ID: 28940798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Data-assisted protein structure modeling by global optimization in CASP12.
Joo K; Heo S; Joung I; Hong SH; Lee SJ; Lee J
Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1():240-246. PubMed ID: 29341255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using Local Protein Model Quality Estimates to Guide a Molecular Dynamics-Based Refinement Strategy.
Adiyaman R; McGuffin LJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2627():119-140. PubMed ID: 36959445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Princeton_TIGRESS 2.0: High refinement consistency and net gains through support vector machines and molecular dynamics in double-blind predictions during the CASP11 experiment.
Khoury GA; Smadbeck J; Kieslich CA; Koskosidis AJ; Guzman YA; Tamamis P; Floudas CA
Proteins; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1078-1098. PubMed ID: 28241391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of the UNRES force field in template-assisted prediction of protein structures and the refinement of server models: Test with CASP12 targets.
Karczyńska A; Mozolewska MA; Krupa P; Giełdoń A; Bojarski KK; Zaborowski B; Liwo A; Ślusarz R; Ślusarz M; Lee J; Joo K; Czaplewski C
J Mol Graph Model; 2018 Aug; 83():92-99. PubMed ID: 29860162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Simple and Efficient Protein Structure Refinement Method.
Cheng Q; Joung I; Lee J
J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Oct; 13(10):5146-5162. PubMed ID: 28800396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between self-guided Langevin dynamics and molecular dynamics simulations for structure refinement of protein loop conformations.
Olson MA; Chaudhury S; Lee MS
J Comput Chem; 2011 Nov; 32(14):3014-22. PubMed ID: 21793008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of contact predictions in CASP12: Co-evolution and deep learning coming of age.
Schaarschmidt J; Monastyrskyy B; Kryshtafovych A; Bonvin AMJJ
Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):51-66. PubMed ID: 29071738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of refinement of template-based models in CASP11.
Modi V; Dunbrack RL
Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):260-81. PubMed ID: 27081793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Protein structure refinement via molecular-dynamics simulations: What works and what does not?
Feig M; Mirjalili V
Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):282-92. PubMed ID: 26234208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
