These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28833585)

  • 61. Protein structure prediction using residue- and fragment-environment potentials in CASP11.
    Kim H; Kihara D
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):105-17. PubMed ID: 26344195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. The challenge of modeling protein assemblies: the CASP12-CAPRI experiment.
    Lensink MF; Velankar S; Baek M; Heo L; Seok C; Wodak SJ
    Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1():257-273. PubMed ID: 29127686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Continuous Automated Model EvaluatiOn (CAMEO) complementing the critical assessment of structure prediction in CASP12.
    Haas J; Barbato A; Behringer D; Studer G; Roth S; Bertoni M; Mostaguir K; Gumienny R; Schwede T
    Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):387-398. PubMed ID: 29178137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Small angle X-ray scattering-assisted protein structure prediction in CASP13 and emergence of solution structure differences.
    Hura GL; Hodge CD; Rosenberg D; Guzenko D; Duarte JM; Monastyrskyy B; Grudinin S; Kryshtafovych A; Tainer JA; Fidelis K; Tsutakawa SE
    Proteins; 2019 Dec; 87(12):1298-1314. PubMed ID: 31589784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. High-accuracy protein structures by combining machine-learning with physics-based refinement.
    Heo L; Feig M
    Proteins; 2020 May; 88(5):637-642. PubMed ID: 31693199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Partial unfolding and refolding for structure refinement: A unified approach of geometric simulations and molecular dynamics.
    Kumar A; Campitelli P; Thorpe MF; Ozkan SB
    Proteins; 2015 Dec; 83(12):2279-92. PubMed ID: 26476100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Application of statistical potentials to protein structure refinement from low resolution ab initio models.
    Lu H; Skolnick J
    Biopolymers; 2003 Dec; 70(4):575-84. PubMed ID: 14648767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Evaluation of template-based modeling in CASP13.
    Croll TI; Sammito MD; Kryshtafovych A; Read RJ
    Proteins; 2019 Dec; 87(12):1113-1127. PubMed ID: 31407380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Implicit flexibility in protein docking: cross-docking and local refinement.
    Król M; Chaleil RA; Tournier AL; Bates PA
    Proteins; 2007 Dec; 69(4):750-7. PubMed ID: 17671977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)-Round XIII.
    Kryshtafovych A; Schwede T; Topf M; Fidelis K; Moult J
    Proteins; 2019 Dec; 87(12):1011-1020. PubMed ID: 31589781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Evaluation of predictions in the CASP10 model refinement category.
    Nugent T; Cozzetto D; Jones DT
    Proteins; 2014 Feb; 82 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):98-111. PubMed ID: 23900810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Definition and classification of evaluation units for tertiary structure prediction in CASP12 facilitated through semi-automated metrics.
    Abriata LA; Kinch LN; Tamò GE; Monastyrskyy B; Kryshtafovych A; Dal Peraro M
    Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1():16-26. PubMed ID: 29044714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Template-free modeling by LEE and LEER in CASP11.
    Joung I; Lee SY; Cheng Q; Kim JY; Joo K; Lee SJ; Lee J
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1():118-30. PubMed ID: 26474186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Accurate De Novo Prediction of Protein Contact Map by Ultra-Deep Learning Model.
    Wang S; Sun S; Li Z; Zhang R; Xu J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Jan; 13(1):e1005324. PubMed ID: 28056090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Improved Sampling Strategies for Protein Model Refinement Based on Molecular Dynamics Simulation.
    Heo L; Arbour CF; Janson G; Feig M
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2021 Mar; 17(3):1931-1943. PubMed ID: 33562962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. CASP 11 target classification.
    Kinch LN; Li W; Schaeffer RD; Dunbrack RL; Monastyrskyy B; Kryshtafovych A; Grishin NV
    Proteins; 2016 Sep; 84 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):20-33. PubMed ID: 26756794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Molecular-dynamics simulation methods for macromolecular crystallography.
    Wych DC; Aoto PC; Vu L; Wolff AM; Mobley DL; Fraser JS; Taylor SS; Wall ME
    Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol; 2023 Jan; 79(Pt 1):50-65. PubMed ID: 36601807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Assessment of model accuracy estimations in CASP12.
    Kryshtafovych A; Monastyrskyy B; Fidelis K; Schwede T; Tramontano A
    Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):345-360. PubMed ID: 28833563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Prediction of protein structure with the coarse-grained UNRES force field assisted by small X-ray scattering data and knowledge-based information.
    Karczyńska AS; Mozolewska MA; Krupa P; Giełdoń A; Liwo A; Czaplewski C
    Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1():228-239. PubMed ID: 29134679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Advances in implicit models of water solvent to compute conformational free energy and molecular dynamics of proteins at constant pH.
    Vorobjev YN
    Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol; 2011; 85():281-322. PubMed ID: 21920327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.