These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28834035)

  • 1. Ethical violations and discriminatory behavior in the MedPhys Match.
    Hendrickson KRG; Juang T; Rodrigues A; Burmeister JW
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 18(5):336-350. PubMed ID: 28834035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Integrity of the National Resident Matching Program for Radiation Oncology: National Survey of Applicant Experiences.
    Holliday EB; Thomas CR; Kusano AS
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jul; 92(3):525-31. PubMed ID: 25936811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Applicant Interview Experiences and Postinterview Communication of the 2016 Radiation Oncology Match Cycle.
    Berriochoa C; Ward MC; Weller MA; Holliday E; Kusano A; Thomas CR; Tendulkar RD
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 Nov; 96(3):514-20. PubMed ID: 27681747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The MedPhys match survey: Search criteria and advice for programs and applicants.
    Hendrickson KRG; Juang T; Rodrigues AE; Burmeister JW
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 May; 22(5):150-167. PubMed ID: 33786983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The integrity of the dermatology National Resident Matching Program: results of a national study.
    Sbicca JA; Gorell ES; Kanzler MH; Lane AT
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2010 Oct; 63(4):594-601. PubMed ID: 20599295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Emergency medicine residency applicant perceptions of unethical recruiting practices and illegal questioning in the match.
    Thurman RJ; Katz E; Carter W; Han J; Kayala E; McCoin N; Storrow AB
    Acad Emerg Med; 2009 Jun; 16(6):550-7. PubMed ID: 19388912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Asking for a commitment: violations during the 2007 match and the effect on applicant rank lists.
    Hern HG; Johnson B; Alter HJ; Wills CP; Snoey ER; Simon BC
    West J Emerg Med; 2015 Mar; 16(2):331-5. PubMed ID: 25834683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trends in Post-Interview Communication Practices.
    Harvey RS; Kovatch KJ; Prince MEP; Malloy KM; Thorne MC
    Laryngoscope; 2019 Mar; 129(3):607-612. PubMed ID: 30247746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Urology Match and Postinterview Communication.
    Farber NJ; Neylan CJ; Kaplan A; Singer EA; Elsamra SE
    Urology; 2018 Dec; 122():44-51. PubMed ID: 29935262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Urology Match Process and the Limited Value of Post-Interview Communication for Program Directors.
    Farber NJ; Neylan CJ; Srivastava A; Pandya SS; Kaplan A; Radadia KD; Singer EA; Elsamra SE
    Urology; 2019 Jun; 128():23-30. PubMed ID: 30844386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The National Resident Matching Program Code of Conduct: What Is the Perceived Degree of Compliance During the Urology Match Process?
    Sebesta EM; Lipsky MJ; Nunez M; Cooper KL; Badalato GM
    Urology; 2018 Dec; 122():37-43. PubMed ID: 29935263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Have We Come as Far as We Had Hoped? Discrimination in the Residency Interview.
    Hessel K; DiPasco P; Kilgore L; Shelley C; Perry A; Wagner J
    J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(6):939-945. PubMed ID: 28483440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peri-Interview Communication in the Otolaryngology Residency Match: The Applicant Perspective.
    Masciello M; Malekzadeh S
    Laryngoscope; 2021 Jan; 131(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 32065402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The urology residency matching program in practice.
    Teichman JM; Anderson KD; Dorough MM; Stein CR; Optenberg SA; Thompson IM
    J Urol; 2000 Jun; 163(6):1878-87. PubMed ID: 10799214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Residency Match: Interview Experiences, Postinterview Communication, and Associated Distress.
    Berriochoa C; Reddy CA; Dorsey S; Campbell S; Poblete-Lopez C; Schlenk R; Spencer A; Lee J; Eagleton M; Tendulkar RD
    J Grad Med Educ; 2018 Aug; 10(4):403-408. PubMed ID: 30154970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recruitment behavior and program directors: how ethical are their perspectives about the match process?
    Carek PJ; Anderson KD; Blue AV; Mavis BE
    Fam Med; 2000 Apr; 32(4):258-60. PubMed ID: 10782372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selection of Neurological Surgery Applicants and the Value of Standardized Letters of Evaluation: A Survey of United States Program Directors.
    Field NC; Gullick MM; German JW
    World Neurosurg; 2020 Apr; 136():e342-e346. PubMed ID: 31926362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fellowship directors' perceptions of the 2005 NRMP Radiology Fellowship Match.
    Shetty SK; Resnik CS
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Jan; 13(1):121-30. PubMed ID: 16399040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Post-Interview Communication During Application to Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Programs.
    Brooks JT; Reidler JS; Jain A; LaPorte DM; Sterling RS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Oct; 98(19):e84. PubMed ID: 27707858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Professionalism and the match: a pediatric residency program's postinterview no-call policy and its impact on applicants.
    Opel D; Shugerman R; McPhillips H; Swanson WS; Archibald S; Diekema D
    Pediatrics; 2007 Oct; 120(4):e826-31. PubMed ID: 17768182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.