These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28834326)
1. Proposal for a gold standard for cosmetic evaluation after breast conserving therapy: Results from the St George and Wollongong Breast Boost trial. Merie R; Browne L; Cardoso JS; Cardoso MJ; Chin Y; Clark C; Graham P; Szwajcer A; Hau E J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2017 Dec; 61(6):819-825. PubMed ID: 28834326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiotherapy breast boost with reduced whole-breast dose is associated with improved cosmesis: the results of a comprehensive assessment from the St. George and Wollongong randomized breast boost trial. Hau E; Browne LH; Khanna S; Cail S; Cert G; Chin Y; Clark C; Inder S; Szwajcer A; Graham PH Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Feb; 82(2):682-9. PubMed ID: 21255943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Turning subjective into objective: the BCCT.core software for evaluation of cosmetic results in breast cancer conservative treatment. Cardoso MJ; Cardoso J; Amaral N; Azevedo I; Barreau L; Bernardo M; Christie D; Costa S; Fitzal F; Fougo JL; Johansen J; Macmillan D; Mano MP; Regolo L; Rosa J; Teixeira L; Vrieling C Breast; 2007 Oct; 16(5):456-61. PubMed ID: 17606373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of breast cosmetic changes with a computer-software; the breast cancer conservative treatment cosmetic results (BCCT. core) in hypofractionated whole breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery-supplementary analysis of multicenter single-arm confirmatory trial: JCOG0906. Nozaki M; Kagami Y; Takahashi M; Machida R; Sekino Y; Shibata T; Ito Y; Nishimura Y; Teshima T; Ushijima H; Nagata Y; Matsumoto Y; Akimoto T; Takahashi K; Murayama S; Uno T; Tsujino K; Hamamoto Y; Nakagawa K; Kodaira T; Hiraoka M; Breast Cancer; 2022 Nov; 29(6):1042-1049. PubMed ID: 35861936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability of the BCCT.core software in evaluation of breast cosmesis - A systematic review. Trakis S; Lord H; Graham P; Fernandez R J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2021 Oct; 65(6):817-825. PubMed ID: 33973358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Aesthetic result after breast-conserving therapy is associated with quality of life several years after treatment. Swedish women evaluated with BCCT.core and BREAST-Q™. Dahlbäck C; Ullmark JH; Rehn M; Ringberg A; Manjer J Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Aug; 164(3):679-687. PubMed ID: 28536951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of cosmetic outcome following breast-conserving therapy in trials: panel versus digitalized analysis and the role of PROMs. Lagendijk M; Vos EL; Nieboer D; Verhoef C; Corten EML; Koppert LB Breast J; 2018 Jul; 24(4):519-525. PubMed ID: 29316049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of the boost in breast-conserving therapy on cosmetic outcome in the EORTC "boost versus no boost" trial. EORTC Radiotherapy and Breast Cancer Cooperative Groups. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Vrieling C; Collette L; Fourquet A; Hoogenraad WJ; Horiot JC; Jager JJ; Pierart M; Poortmans PM; Struikmans H; Van der Hulst M; Van der Schueren E; Bartelink H Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Oct; 45(3):677-85. PubMed ID: 10524422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Aesthetic outcome following breast-conserving surgery assessed by three evaluation modalities in relation to health-related quality of life. Dahlbäck C; Ringberg A; Manjer J Br J Surg; 2019 Jan; 106(1):90-99. PubMed ID: 30160774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In Search of a Gold Standard Scoring System for the Subjective Evaluation of Cosmetic Outcomes Following Breast-Conserving Therapy. Racz JM; Hong NL; Latosinsky S Breast J; 2015; 21(4):345-51. PubMed ID: 25940058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictors for poor cosmetic outcome in patients with early stage breast cancer treated with breast conserving therapy: Results of the Young boost trial. Brouwers PJAM; van Werkhoven E; Bartelink H; Fourquet A; Lemanski C; van Loon J; Maduro JH; Russell NS; Scheijmans LJEE; Schinagl DAX; Westenberg AH; Poortmans P; Boersma LJ; Radiother Oncol; 2018 Sep; 128(3):434-441. PubMed ID: 29980320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cosmetic outcome as rated by patients, doctors, nurses and BCCT.core software assessed over 5 years in a subset of patients in the TARGIT-A Trial. Corica T; Nowak AK; Saunders CM; Bulsara MK; Taylor M; Williams NR; Keshtgar M; Joseph DJ; Vaidya JS Radiat Oncol; 2018 Apr; 13(1):68. PubMed ID: 29653541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of the methods of cosmetic assessment after breast-conserving therapy in the EORTC "boost versus no boost" trial. EORTC Radiotherapy and Breast Cancer Cooperative Groups. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Vrieling C; Collette L; Bartelink E; Borger JH; Brenninkmeyer SJ; Horiot JC; Pierart M; Poortmans PM; Struikmans H; Van der Schueren E; Van Dongen JA; Van Limbergen E; Bartelink H Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Oct; 45(3):667-76. PubMed ID: 10524421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intraoperative ultrasound guidance in breast-conserving surgery shows superiority in oncological outcome, long-term cosmetic and patient-reported outcomes: Final outcomes of a randomized controlled trial (COBALT). Volders JH; Haloua MH; Krekel NM; Negenborn VL; Kolk RH; Lopes Cardozo AM; Bosch AM; de Widt-Levert LM; van der Veen H; Rijna H; Taets van Amerongen AH; Jóźwiak K; Meijer S; van den Tol MP Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):649-657. PubMed ID: 27916314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Objective assessment of aesthetic outcome after breast conserving therapy: subjective third party panel rating and objective BCCT.core software evaluation. Heil J; Carolus A; Dahlkamp J; Golatta M; Domschke C; Schuetz F; Blumenstein M; Rauch G; Sohn C Breast; 2012 Feb; 21(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 21852135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Objective Measurement of Cosmetic Outcomes of Breast Conserving Therapy Using BCCT.core. Yu T; Eom KY; Jang NY; Kim KS; Koo TR; Kwon J; Kim BH; Kang E; Kim SW; Kim JS; Kim IA Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Apr; 48(2):491-8. PubMed ID: 26130667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Objective assessment of cosmetic outcome after targeted intraoperative radiotherapy in breast cancer: results from a randomised controlled trial. Keshtgar MR; Williams NR; Bulsara M; Saunders C; Flyger H; Cardoso JS; Corica T; Bentzon N; Michalopoulos NV; Joseph DJ Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2013 Aug; 140(3):519-25. PubMed ID: 23877341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cosmetic analysis following breast-conserving surgery and adjuvant high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for early-stage breast cancer: a prospective clinical study. Garsa AA; Ferraro DJ; DeWees T; Margenthaler JA; Naughton M; Aft R; Gillanders WE; Eberlein T; Matesa MA; Zoberi I Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Mar; 85(4):965-70. PubMed ID: 23058060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cosmetic outcome and quality of life are inextricably linked in breast-conserving therapy. Volders JH; Negenborn VL; Haloua MH; Krekel NMA; Jóźwiak K; Meijer S; M van den Tol P J Surg Oncol; 2017 Jun; 115(8):941-948. PubMed ID: 28334419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cosmetic Outcomes and Quality of Life in Thai Women Post Breast Conserving Therapy for Breast Cancer. Thanarpan P; Somrit M; Rungarun J; Paytai R; Duangjai S; Chanon K; Puttisak P Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(11):4685-90. PubMed ID: 26107224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]