These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28834818)

  • 21. Agreement between swept-source optical biometry and Scheimpflug-based topography measurements of posterior corneal curvature.
    Kose B
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2022 Feb; 48(2):185-189. PubMed ID: 34174042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical comparison of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and a time-domain optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer.
    Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C; Chonpimai P; Loket S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2224-32. PubMed ID: 26703299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of anterior segment measurements using Sirius Topographer
    Duman R; Çetinkaya E; Duman R; Dogan M; Sabaner MC
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2018 Mar; 66(3):402-406. PubMed ID: 29480251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of photorefractive keratectomy on agreement of anterior segment variables obtained by a swept-source biometer vs a Scheimpflug-based tomographer.
    Salouti R; Kamalipour A; Masihpour N; Zamani M; Ghoreyshi M; Salouti K; Nowroozzadeh MH
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1229-1235. PubMed ID: 32483074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Measurement agreement between a new biometer based on partial coherence interferometry and a validated biometer based on optical low-coherence reflectometry.
    Li J; Chen H; Savini G; Lu W; Yu X; Bao F; Wang Q; Huang J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 26948780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Agreement Between Two Optical Biometers Based on Large Coherence Length SS-OCT and Scheimpflug Imaging/Partial Coherence Interferometry.
    Tu R; Yu J; Savini G; Ye J; Ning R; Xiong J; Chen S; Huang J
    J Refract Surg; 2020 Jul; 36(7):459-465. PubMed ID: 32644168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of Corneal Diameter and Anterior Chamber Depth Measurements Using 4 Different Devices.
    Shajari M; Lehmann UC; Kohnen T
    Cornea; 2016 Jun; 35(6):838-42. PubMed ID: 27100654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Repeatability and reproducibility of ocular biometry using a new noncontact optical low-coherence interferometer.
    Huang J; Savini G; Wu F; Yu X; Yang J; Yu A; Yu Y; Wang Q
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2233-41. PubMed ID: 26703300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Repeatability and agreement in optical biometry of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer versus partial coherence interferometry and optical low-coherence reflectometry.
    Kunert KS; Peter M; Blum M; Haigis W; Sekundo W; Schütze J; Büehren T
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 26948781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of the measurements of a novel optical biometry: Nidek AL-Scan with Sirius and a ultrasound biometry.
    Çağlar Ç; Kocamış Sİ; Demir E; Durmuş M
    Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Jun; 37(3):491-498. PubMed ID: 27392914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of central corneal thickness with four noncontact devices: An agreement analysis of swept-source technology.
    Ozyol E; Özyol P
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2017 Jun; 65(6):461-465. PubMed ID: 28643709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of anterior segment measurements by 3 Scheimpflug tomographers and 1 Placido corneal topographer.
    Savini G; Carbonelli M; Sbreglia A; Barboni P; Deluigi G; Hoffer KJ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1679-85. PubMed ID: 21855765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of anterior segment measurements obtained using a swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer and a Scheimpflug-Placido tomographer.
    Lu W; Li Y; Savini G; Song B; Hu Q; Wang Q; Bao F; Huang J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Mar; 45(3):298-304. PubMed ID: 30851806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Corneal diameter measurements by corneal topography and angle-to-angle measurements by optical coherence tomography: evaluation of equivalence.
    Piñero DP; Plaza Puche AB; Alió JL
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Jan; 34(1):126-31. PubMed ID: 18165092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Repeatability and interobserver reproducibility of a new optical biometer based on swept-source optical coherence tomography and comparison with IOLMaster.
    Huang J; Savini G; Hoffer KJ; Chen H; Lu W; Hu Q; Bao F; Wang Q
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 101(4):493-498. PubMed ID: 27503393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of anterior segment measurements with LenStar and Pentacam in patients with newly diagnosed glaucoma.
    Sen E; Inanc M; Elgin U; Yilmazbas P
    Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Feb; 38(1):171-174. PubMed ID: 28108902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparative analysis of 2 biometers using swept-source OCT technology.
    Panthier C; Rouger H; Gozlan Y; Moran S; Gatinel D
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2022 Jan; 48(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 34034291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Agreement of total corneal power between 2 swept-source optical coherence tomography and Scheimpflug tomography in normal and keratoconic patients.
    Asawaworarit R; Satitpitakul V; Taweekitikul P; Pongpirul K
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(5):e0268856. PubMed ID: 35609043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation and comparison of a novel Scheimpflug-based optical biometer with standard partial coherence interferometry for biometry and intraocular lens power calculation.
    Wang Z; Yang W; Li D; Chen W; Zhao Q; Li Y; Cui R; Shen L; Xian J
    Exp Ther Med; 2021 Apr; 21(4):326. PubMed ID: 33732299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Repeatability data and agreement of keratometry with the VERION system compared to the IOLMaster.
    Nemeth G; Szalai E; Hassan Z; Lipecz A; Berta A; Modis L
    J Refract Surg; 2015 May; 31(5):333-7. PubMed ID: 25974973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.