These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28835193)

  • 21. [Confounder adjustment in observational comparative effectiveness researches: (2) statistical adjustment approaches for unmeasured confounders].
    Huang LL; Wei YY; Chen F
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Nov; 40(11):1450-1455. PubMed ID: 31838820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sensitivity analysis for the effects of multiple unmeasured confounders.
    Groenwold RH; Sterne JA; Lawlor DA; Moons KG; Hoes AW; Tilling K
    Ann Epidemiol; 2016 Sep; 26(9):605-11. PubMed ID: 27576907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The impact of residual and unmeasured confounding in epidemiologic studies: a simulation study.
    Fewell Z; Davey Smith G; Sterne JA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 166(6):646-55. PubMed ID: 17615092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Bespoke Instruments: A new tool for addressing unmeasured confounders.
    Richardson DB; Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2022 Mar; 191(5):939-947. PubMed ID: 34907434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Methodological comparison of marginal structural model, time-varying Cox regression, and propensity score methods: the example of antidepressant use and the risk of hip fracture.
    Ali MS; Groenwold RH; Belitser SV; Souverein PC; Martín E; Gatto NM; Huerta C; Gardarsdottir H; Roes KC; Hoes AW; de Boer A; Klungel OH
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2016 Mar; 25 Suppl 1():114-21. PubMed ID: 27038357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A Cautionary Note on Using Propensity Score Calibration to Control for Unmeasured Confounding Bias When the Surrogacy Assumption Is Absent.
    Wan F
    Am J Epidemiol; 2024 Feb; 193(2):360-369. PubMed ID: 37759344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [How to adjust confounders in studies on observational comparative effectiveness: (3) approaches on sensitivity analysis for confounder adjustment].
    Huang LL; Zhao Y; Wei YY; Chen F
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Dec; 40(12):1645-1649. PubMed ID: 32062931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. On the role of marginal confounder prevalence - implications for the high-dimensional propensity score algorithm.
    Schuster T; Pang M; Platt RW
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2015 Sep; 24(9):1004-7. PubMed ID: 25866189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparing g-computation, propensity score-based weighting, and targeted maximum likelihood estimation for analyzing externally controlled trials with both measured and unmeasured confounders: a simulation study.
    Ren J; Cislo P; Cappelleri JC; Hlavacek P; DiBonaventura M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Jan; 23(1):18. PubMed ID: 36647031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Adjusting for unmeasured confounding using validation data: Simplified two-stage calibration for survival and dichotomous outcomes.
    Hjellvik V; De Bruin ML; Samuelsen SO; Karlstad Ø; Andersen M; Haukka J; Vestergaard P; de Vries F; Furu K
    Stat Med; 2019 Jul; 38(15):2719-2734. PubMed ID: 30828842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessing causal treatment effect estimation when using large observational datasets.
    John ER; Abrams KR; Brightling CE; Sheehan NA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):207. PubMed ID: 31726969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of statistical approaches dealing with time-dependent confounding in drug effectiveness studies.
    Karim ME; Petkau J; Gustafson P; Platt RW; Tremlett H;
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Jun; 27(6):1709-1722. PubMed ID: 27659168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Magnitude and direction of missing confounders had different consequences on treatment effect estimation in propensity score analysis.
    Nguyen TL; Collins GS; Spence J; Fontaine C; Daurès JP; Devereaux PJ; Landais P; Le Manach Y
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jul; 87():87-97. PubMed ID: 28412467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Adjusting effect estimates for unmeasured confounding with validation data using propensity score calibration.
    Stürmer T; Schneeweiss S; Avorn J; Glynn RJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2005 Aug; 162(3):279-89. PubMed ID: 15987725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Correcting for Measurement Error in Time-Varying Covariates in Marginal Structural Models.
    Kyle RP; Moodie EE; Klein MB; Abrahamowicz M
    Am J Epidemiol; 2016 Aug; 184(3):249-58. PubMed ID: 27416840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The impact of unmeasured within- and between-cluster confounding on the bias of effect estimatorsof a continuous exposure.
    Li Y; Lee Y; Port FK; Robinson BM
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Aug; 29(8):2119-2139. PubMed ID: 31694489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Using nationally representative survey data for external adjustment of unmeasured confounders: An example using the NHANES data.
    Hernández-Díaz S; Bateman BT; Palmsten K; Schneeweiss S; Huybrechts KF
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2020 Sep; 29(9):1151-1158. PubMed ID: 31863536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Prior event rate ratio adjustment: numerical studies of a statistical method to address unrecognized confounding in observational studies.
    Yu M; Xie D; Wang X; Weiner MG; Tannen RL
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2012 May; 21 Suppl 2():60-8. PubMed ID: 22552981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Time dependent hazard ratio estimation using instrumental variables without conditioning on an omitted covariate.
    MacKenzie TA; Martinez-Camblor P; O'Malley AJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Mar; 21(1):56. PubMed ID: 33743583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Estimation of marginal structural models under irregular visits and unmeasured confounder: calibrated inverse probability weights.
    Kalia S; Saarela O; Escobar M; Moineddin R; Greiver M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Jan; 23(1):4. PubMed ID: 36611135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.