These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28835556)
1. Stabilizing selection on individual pattern elements of aposematic signals. Winters AE; Green NF; Wilson NG; How MJ; Garson MJ; Marshall NJ; Cheney KL Proc Biol Sci; 2017 Aug; 284(1861):. PubMed ID: 28835556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Temporal relationship between genetic and warning signal variation in the aposematic wood tiger moth (Parasemia plantaginis). Galarza JA; Nokelainen O; Ashrafi R; Hegna RH; Mappes J Mol Ecol; 2014 Oct; 23(20):4939-57. PubMed ID: 25211063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Conditions for the spread of conspicuous warning signals: a numerical model with novel insights. Puurtinen M; Kaitala V Evolution; 2006 Nov; 60(11):2246-56. PubMed ID: 17236418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perspective: the evolution of warning coloration is not paradoxical. Marples NM; Kelly DJ; Thomas RJ Evolution; 2005 May; 59(5):933-40. PubMed ID: 16136793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Geographic mosaic of selection by avian predators on hindwing warning colour in a polymorphic aposematic moth. Rönkä K; Valkonen JK; Nokelainen O; Rojas B; Gordon S; Burdfield-Steel E; Mappes J Ecol Lett; 2020 Nov; 23(11):1654-1663. PubMed ID: 32881319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of predators in maintaining the geographic organization of aposematic signals. Chouteau M; Angers B Am Nat; 2011 Dec; 178(6):810-7. PubMed ID: 22089874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prey with hidden colour defences benefit from their similarity to aposematic signals. Kim Y; Hwang Y; Bae S; Sherratt TN; An J; Choi SW; Miller JC; Kang C Proc Biol Sci; 2020 Sep; 287(1934):20201894. PubMed ID: 32900312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Weapons or deterrents? Nudibranch molluscs use distinct ecological modes of chemical defence against predators. Winters AE; Chan W; White AM; van den Berg CP; Garson MJ; Cheney KL J Anim Ecol; 2022 Apr; 91(4):831-844. PubMed ID: 34839542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Warning signal brightness variation: sexual selection may work under the radar of natural selection in populations of a polytypic poison frog. Crothers LR; Cummings ME Am Nat; 2013 May; 181(5):E116-24. PubMed ID: 23594556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automimicry destabilizes aposematism: predator sample-and-reject behaviour may provide a solution. Gamberale-Stille G; Guilford T Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Dec; 271(1557):2621-5. PubMed ID: 15615689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk of social colours in an agamid lizard: implications for the evolution of dynamic signals. Amdekar MS; Thaker M Biol Lett; 2019 May; 15(5):20190207. PubMed ID: 31088284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Changes in predator community structure shifts the efficacy of two warning signals in Arctiid moths. Nokelainen O; Valkonen J; Lindstedt C; Mappes J J Anim Ecol; 2014 May; 83(3):598-605. PubMed ID: 24164666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predator mixes and the conspicuousness of aposematic signals. Endler JA; Mappes J Am Nat; 2004 Apr; 163(4):532-47. PubMed ID: 15122501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Aposematic signals and the relationship between conspicuousness and distinctiveness. Merilaita S; Ruxton GD J Theor Biol; 2007 Mar; 245(2):268-77. PubMed ID: 17157321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]