143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28837225)
1. Toward image quality assessment in mammography using model observers: Detection of a calcification-like object.
Bouwman RW; Mackenzie A; van Engen RE; Broeders MJM; Young KC; Dance DR; den Heeten GJ; Veldkamp WJH
Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 44(11):5726-5739. PubMed ID: 28837225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can a channelized Hotelling observer assess image quality in acquired mammographic images of an anthropomorphic breast phantom including image processing?
Balta C; Bouwman RW; Sechopoulos I; Broeders MJM; Karssemeijer N; van Engen RE; Veldkamp WJH
Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):714-725. PubMed ID: 30561108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A model observer study using acquired mammographic images of an anthropomorphic breast phantom.
Balta C; Bouwman RW; Sechopoulos I; Broeders MJM; Karssemeijer N; van Engen RE; Veldkamp WJH
Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):655-665. PubMed ID: 29193129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The regression detectability index RDI for mammography images of breast phantoms with calcification-like objects and anatomical background.
Anton M; Reginatto M; Elster C; Mäder U; Schopphoven S; Sechopoulos I; van Engen R
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Nov; 66(22):. PubMed ID: 34706354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A performance comparison of anthropomorphic model observers for breast cone beam CT images: A single-slice and multislice study.
Han M; Baek J
Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 46(8):3431-3441. PubMed ID: 31106432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of image quality on calcification detection in digital mammography.
Warren LM; Mackenzie A; Cooke J; Given-Wilson RM; Wallis MG; Chakraborty DP; Dance DR; Bosmans H; Young KC
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3202-13. PubMed ID: 22755704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can the channelized Hotelling observer including aspects of the human visual system predict human observer performance in mammography?
Bouwman RW; Goffi M; van Engen RE; Broeders MJ; Dance DR; Young KC; Veldkamp WJ
Phys Med; 2017 Jan; 33():95-105. PubMed ID: 28040401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimization of the difference-of-Gaussian channel sets for the channelized Hotelling observer.
Balta C; Bouwman RW; Broeders MJM; Karssemeijer N; Veldkamp WJH; Sechopoulos I; van Engen RE
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2019 Jul; 6(3):035501. PubMed ID: 31572746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation between a 2D channelized Hotelling observer and human observers in a low-contrast detection task with multislice reading in CT.
Yu L; Chen B; Kofler JM; Favazza CP; Leng S; Kupinski MA; McCollough CH
Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):3990-3999. PubMed ID: 28555878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Low contrast detectability performance of model observers based on CT phantom images: kVp influence.
Hernandez-Giron I; Calzado A; Geleijns J; Joemai RM; Veldkamp WJ
Phys Med; 2015 Nov; 31(7):798-807. PubMed ID: 25979210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can the non-pre-whitening model observer, including aspects of the human visual system, predict human observer performance in mammography?
Bouwman RW; van Engen RE; Broeders MJ; den Heeten GJ; Dance DR; Young KC; Veldkamp WJ
Phys Med; 2016 Dec; 32(12):1559-1569. PubMed ID: 27889130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Signal template generation from acquired images for model observer-based image quality analysis in mammography.
Balta C; Bouwman RW; Veldkamp WJH; Broeders MJM; Sechopoulos I; van Engen RE
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2018 Jul; 5(3):035503. PubMed ID: 30840714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlation between model observer and human observer performance in CT imaging when lesion location is uncertain.
Leng S; Yu L; Zhang Y; Carter R; Toledano AY; McCollough CH
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081908. PubMed ID: 23927322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation between human observer performance and model observer performance in differential phase contrast CT.
Li K; Garrett J; Chen GH
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111905. PubMed ID: 24320438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison between human and model observer performance in low-contrast detection tasks in CT images: application to images reconstructed with filtered back projection and iterative algorithms.
Hernandez-Giron I; Calzado A; Geleijns J; Joemai RM; Veldkamp WJ
Br J Radiol; 2014 Jul; 87(1039):20140014. PubMed ID: 24837275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Design of a model observer to evaluate calcification detectability in breast tomosynthesis and application to smoothing prior optimization.
Michielsen K; Nuyts J; Cockmartin L; Marshall N; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 43(12):6577. PubMed ID: 27908152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accurate and efficient measurement of channelized Hotelling observer-based low-contrast detectability on the ACR CT accreditation phantom.
Fan M; Thayib T; McCollough C; Yu L
Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 50(2):737-749. PubMed ID: 36273393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tailoring automatic exposure control toward constant detectability in digital mammography.
Salvagnini E; Bosmans H; Struelens L; Marshall NW
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3834-47. PubMed ID: 26133585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of clinical full field digital mammography with the task specific system-model-based Fourier Hotelling observer (SMFHO) SNR.
Liu H; Chakrabarti K; Kaczmarek RV; Benevides L; Gu S; Kyprianou IS
Med Phys; 2014 May; 41(5):051907. PubMed ID: 24784386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automated assessment of low contrast sensitivity for CT systems using a model observer.
Hernandez-Giron I; Geleijns J; Calzado A; Veldkamp WJ
Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38 Suppl 1():S25. PubMed ID: 21978115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
