These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Comparison of injection pain, heart rate increase, and postinjection pain of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraligamentary injection administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system. Nusstein J; Berlin J; Reader A; Beck M; Weaver JM Anesth Prog; 2004; 51(4):126-33. PubMed ID: 15675261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraligamentary injection administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system. Berlin J; Nusstein J; Reader A; Beck M; Weaver J Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Mar; 99(3):361-6. PubMed ID: 15716846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the Efficacy Between Articaine and Lignocaine in Simultaneous Bilateral Orthodontic Maxillary Premolar Extractions: A Split-Mouth Comparative Study. Krishna S; Bhaskaran R; Kumar SP; Krishnan M Cureus; 2023 Dec; 15(12):e50078. PubMed ID: 38192927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy of Articaine Versus Lidocaine Administered as Supplementary Intraligamentary Injection after a Failed Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block: A Randomized Double-blind Study. Aggarwal V; Singla M; Miglani S; Kohli S J Endod; 2019 Jan; 45(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 30527595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pain perception and efficacy of local analgesia using 2% lignocaine, buffered lignocaine, and 4% articaine in pediatric dental procedures. M M A; Khatri A; Kalra N; Tyagi R; Khandelwal D J Dent Anesth Pain Med; 2019 Apr; 19(2):101-109. PubMed ID: 31065592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lignocaine during the surgical removal of the third molar: A comparative prospective study. Jain NK; John RR Anesth Essays Res; 2016; 10(2):356-61. PubMed ID: 27212774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Single tooth anesthesia versus conventional anesthesia: a cross-over study. Campanella V; Libonati A; Nardi R; Angotti V; Gallusi G; Montemurro E; D'Amario M; Marzo G Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Dec; 22(9):3205-3213. PubMed ID: 29525923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness of 2% Articaine as an anesthetic agent in children: randomized controlled trial. Ramadurai N; Gurunathan D; Samuel AV; Subramanian E; Rodrigues SJL Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Sep; 23(9):3543-3550. PubMed ID: 30552590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intraligamentary and Supraperiosteal Anesthesia Efficacy Using a Computer Controlled Delivery System in Mandibular Molars. Elbay ÜŞ; Elbay M; Kaya E; Cilasun Ü J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 27472565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The efficacy and safety of articaine versus lignocaine in dental treatments: a meta-analysis. Katyal V J Dent; 2010 Apr; 38(4):307-17. PubMed ID: 20006669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Single buccal infiltration of high concentration lignocaine versus articaine in maxillary third molar surgery. Phyo HE; Chaiyasamut T; Kiattavorncharoen S; Pairuchvej V; Bhattarai BP; Wongsirichat N J Dent Anesth Pain Med; 2020 Aug; 20(4):203-212. PubMed ID: 32934986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Effectiveness of Articaine and Lidocaine Single Buccal Infiltration versus Conventional Buccal and Palatal Injection Using Lidocaine during Primary Maxillary Molar Extraction: A Randomized Control Trial. Kolli NK; Nirmala SV; Nuvvula S Anesth Essays Res; 2017; 11(1):160-164. PubMed ID: 28298777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of Buccal Infiltration with Articaine and Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block with Lignocaine for Pulp Therapy in Mandibular Primary Molars. Chopra R; Marwaha M; Bansal K; Mittal M J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(4):301-5. PubMed ID: 27471808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A prospective randomized trial of different supplementary local anesthetic techniques after failure of inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis in mandibular teeth. Kanaa MD; Whitworth JM; Meechan JG J Endod; 2012 Apr; 38(4):421-5. PubMed ID: 22414822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of anesthetic efficacy of 2 and 4 % articaine in inferior alveolar nerve block for tooth extraction-a double-blinded randomized clinical trial. Kämmerer PW; Schneider D; Palarie V; Schiegnitz E; Daubländer M Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jan; 21(1):397-403. PubMed ID: 27020911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 2% lignocaine in achieving palatal anesthesia following a single buccal infiltration during periodontal therapy: A randomized double-blind split-mouth study. Ashwath B; Subramoniam S; Vijayalakshmi R; Shanmugam M; Priya BM; Anitha V J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2018; 34(1):107-110. PubMed ID: 29643633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Success Rate of 3 Injection Methods with Articaine for Mandibular First Molars with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A CONSORT Randomized Double-blind Clinical Trial. Shahi S; Rahimi S; Yavari HR; Ghasemi N; Ahmadi F J Endod; 2018 Oct; 44(10):1462-1466. PubMed ID: 30174101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lidocaine in a Primary Intraseptal Injection: A Prospective, Randomized Double-Blind Study. Bonar T; Nusstein J; Reader A; Drum M; Fowler S; Beck M Anesth Prog; 2017; 64(4):203-211. PubMed ID: 29200372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A clinical study of efficacy of 4% articaine hydrochloride versus 2% lignocaine hydrochloride in dentistry. Darawade DA; Kumar S; Budhiraja S; Mittal M; Mehta TN J Int Oral Health; 2014 Sep; 6(5):81-3. PubMed ID: 25395799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]