142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28839841)
1. Risk assessment in acute non-variceal upper GI bleeding: the AIMS65 score in comparison with the Glasgow-Blatchford score in a Scottish population.
Palmer AJ; Moroni F; Mcleish S; Campbell G; Bardgett J; Round J; McMullan C; Rashid M; Clark R; De Las Heras D; Vincent C
Frontline Gastroenterol; 2016 Apr; 7(2):90-96. PubMed ID: 28839841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems.
Robertson M; Majumdar A; Boyapati R; Chung W; Worland T; Terbah R; Wei J; Lontos S; Angus P; Vaughan R
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun; 83(6):1151-60. PubMed ID: 26515955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score and modified Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score in predicting outcomes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: An accuracy and calibration study.
Akhila Arya PV; Thulaseedharan NK; Raj R; Unnikrishnan DC; Jacob A
Indian J Gastroenterol; 2023 Aug; 42(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 37382854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
Yaka E; Yılmaz S; Doğan NÖ; Pekdemir M
Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Jan; 22(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 25556538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of three risk scores to predict outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding; modifying Glasgow-Blatchford with albumin.
Shafaghi A; Gharibpoor F; Mahdipour Z; Samadani AA
Rom J Intern Med; 2019 Dec; 57(4):322-333. PubMed ID: 31268861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Kim MS; Choi J; Shin WC
BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):136. PubMed ID: 31349816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Glasgow Blatchford, pre-endoscopic Rockall and AIMS65 scores show no difference in predicting rebleeding rate and mortality in variceal bleeding.
Budimir I; Gradišer M; Nikolić M; Baršić N; Ljubičić N; Kralj D; Budimir I
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Nov; 51(11):1375-9. PubMed ID: 27356670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Age, blood tests and comorbidities and AIMS65 risk scores outperform Glasgow-Blatchford and pre-endoscopic Rockall score in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Morarasu BC; Sorodoc V; Haisan A; Morarasu S; Bologa C; Haliga RE; Lionte C; Marciuc EA; Elsiddig M; Cimpoesu D; Dimofte GM; Sorodoc L
World J Clin Cases; 2023 Jul; 11(19):4513-4530. PubMed ID: 37469720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study.
Stanley AJ; Laine L; Dalton HR; Ngu JH; Schultz M; Abazi R; Zakko L; Thornton S; Wilkinson K; Khor CJ; Murray IA; Laursen SB;
BMJ; 2017 Jan; 356():i6432. PubMed ID: 28053181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The AIMS65 score compared with the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting outcomes in upper GI bleeding.
Hyett BH; Abougergi MS; Charpentier JP; Kumar NL; Brozovic S; Claggett BL; Travis AC; Saltzman JR
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Apr; 77(4):551-7. PubMed ID: 23357496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford score, and Rockall score in a European series of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: performance when predicting in-hospital and delayed mortality.
Martínez-Cara JG; Jiménez-Rosales R; Úbeda-Muñoz M; de Hierro ML; de Teresa J; Redondo-Cerezo E
United European Gastroenterol J; 2016 Jun; 4(3):371-9. PubMed ID: 27403303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of various prognostic scores in variceal and non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A prospective cohort study.
Rout G; Sharma S; Gunjan D; Kedia S; Nayak B; Shalimar
Indian J Gastroenterol; 2019 Apr; 38(2):158-166. PubMed ID: 30830583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of AIMS65 Score and Other Scoring Systems for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Koreans with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
Park SM; Yeum SC; Kim BW; Kim JS; Kim JH; Sim EH; Ji JS; Choi H
Gut Liver; 2016 Jul; 10(4):526-31. PubMed ID: 27377742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk stratification in acute variceal bleeding: Comparison of the AIMS65 score to established upper gastrointestinal bleeding and liver disease severity risk stratification scoring systems in predicting mortality and rebleeding.
Robertson M; Ng J; Abu Shawish W; Swaine A; Skardoon G; Huynh A; Deshpande S; Low ZY; Sievert W; Angus P
Dig Endosc; 2020 Jul; 32(5):761-768. PubMed ID: 31863515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospective Comparison of the AIMS65 Score, Glasgow-Blatchford Score, and Rockall Score for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Variceal and Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
Chang A; Ouejiaraphant C; Akarapatima K; Rattanasupa A; Prachayakul V
Clin Endosc; 2021 Mar; 54(2):211-221. PubMed ID: 32668528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of three scoring systems in predicting clinical outcomes in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a prospective observational study.
Zhong M; Chen WJ; Lu XY; Qian J; Zhu CQ
J Dig Dis; 2016 Dec; 17(12):820-828. PubMed ID: 27930875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing AIMS65 Score With MEWS, qSOFA Score, Glasgow-Blatchford Score, and Rockall Score for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Cirrhotic Patients With Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
Lai YC; Hung MS; Chen YH; Chen YC
J Acute Med; 2018 Dec; 8(4):154-167. PubMed ID: 32995218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Prospective, Multicenter Study of the AIMS65 Score Compared With the Glasgow-Blatchford Score in Predicting Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage Outcomes.
Abougergi MS; Charpentier JP; Bethea E; Rupawala A; Kheder J; Nompleggi D; Liang P; Travis AC; Saltzman JR
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2016 Jul; 50(6):464-9. PubMed ID: 26302496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of three scoring systems for risk stratification in elderly patients wıth acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Kalkan Ç; Soykan I; Karakaya F; Tüzün A; Gençtürk ZB
Geriatr Gerontol Int; 2017 Apr; 17(4):575-583. PubMed ID: 27075860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Both Full Glasgow-Blatchford Score and Modified Glasgow-Blatchford Score Predict the Need for Intervention and Mortality in Patients with Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
Ur-Rahman A; Guan J; Khalid S; Munaf A; Sharbatji M; Idrisov E; He X; Machavarapu A; Abusaada K
Dig Dis Sci; 2018 Nov; 63(11):3020-3025. PubMed ID: 30022452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
