These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28840206)

  • 21. Acoustic dipole and monopole effects in solid particle interaction dynamics during acoustophoresis.
    Saeidi D; Saghafian M; Haghjooy Javanmard S; Hammarström B; Wiklund M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jun; 145(6):3311. PubMed ID: 31255151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Rapid and Efficient Computation of Cell Paths During Ultrasonic Focusing.
    Babbs CF; Lang MV
    Ultrason Imaging; 2023 Sep; 45(5-6):227-239. PubMed ID: 37644766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Particle separation in microfluidics using a switching ultrasonic field.
    Liu Y; Lim KM
    Lab Chip; 2011 Sep; 11(18):3167-73. PubMed ID: 21826293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Finite element modeling of a microparticle manipulator.
    Neild A; Oberti S; Haake A; Dual J
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e455-60. PubMed ID: 16797643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The forbidden band and size selectivity of acoustic radiation force trapping.
    Li Z; Wang D; Fei C; Qiu Z; Hou C; Wu R; Li D; Zhang Q; Chen D; Chen Z; Feng W; Yang Y
    iScience; 2021 Jan; 24(1):101988. PubMed ID: 33490898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Modelling for the robust design of layered resonators for ultrasonic particle manipulation.
    Hill M; Townsend RJ; Harris NR
    Ultrasonics; 2008 Nov; 48(6-7):521-8. PubMed ID: 18664398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Acoustic control of suspended particles in micro fluidic chips.
    Nilsson A; Petersson F; Jönsson H; Laurell T
    Lab Chip; 2004 Apr; 4(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 15052353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A new immobilisation method to arrange particles in a gel matrix by ultrasound standing waves.
    Gherardini L; Cousins CM; Hawkes JJ; Spengler J; Radel S; Lawler H; Devcic-Kuhar B; Gröschl M; Coakley WT; McLoughlin AJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Feb; 31(2):261-72. PubMed ID: 15708466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Numerical study of acoustophoretic manipulation of particles in microfluidic channels.
    Ma J; Liang D; Yang X; Wang H; Wu F; Sun C; Xiao Y
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2021 Oct; 235(10):1163-1174. PubMed ID: 34116594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Analytical scale ultrasonic standing wave manipulation of cells and microparticles.
    Coakley WT; Hawkes JJ; Sobanski MA; Cousins CM; Spengler J
    Ultrasonics; 2000 Mar; 38(1-8):638-41. PubMed ID: 10829742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Multi-Frequency Acoustic Levitation and Trapping of Particles in All Degrees of Freedom.
    Rothlisberger M; Schmidli G; Schuck M; Kolar JW
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2022 Apr; 69(4):1572-1575. PubMed ID: 35130156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Acoustofluidic platforms for particle manipulation.
    Novotny J; Lenshof A; Laurell T
    Electrophoresis; 2022 Apr; 43(7-8):804-818. PubMed ID: 34719049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Acoustic Manipulation of Bio-Particles at High Frequencies: An Analytical and Simulation Approach.
    Samandari M; Abrinia K; Sanati-Nezhad A
    Micromachines (Basel); 2017 Sep; 8(10):. PubMed ID: 30400480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ultrasonic standing wave manipulation technology integrated into a dielectrophoretic chip.
    Wiklund M; Günther C; Lemor R; Jäger M; Fuhr G; Hertz HM
    Lab Chip; 2006 Dec; 6(12):1537-44. PubMed ID: 17203158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Ultrasonic control of ceramic membrane fouling: Effect of particle characteristics.
    Chen D; Weavers LK; Walker HW
    Water Res; 2006 Feb; 40(4):840-50. PubMed ID: 16442583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Noninvasive acoustic cell trapping in a microfluidic perfusion system for online bioassays.
    Evander M; Johansson L; Lilliehorn T; Piskur J; Lindvall M; Johansson S; Almqvist M; Laurell T; Nilsson J
    Anal Chem; 2007 Apr; 79(7):2984-91. PubMed ID: 17313183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Elastomeric negative acoustic contrast particles for capture, acoustophoretic transport, and confinement of cells in microfluidic systems.
    Shields CW; Johnson LM; Gao L; López GP
    Langmuir; 2014 Apr; 30(14):3923-7. PubMed ID: 24673242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Manipulation of micrometer sized particles within a micromachined fluidic device to form two-dimensional patterns using ultrasound.
    Oberti S; Neild A; Dual J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Feb; 121(2):778-85. PubMed ID: 17348502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Focusing of sub-micrometer particles and bacteria enabled by two-dimensional acoustophoresis.
    Antfolk M; Muller PB; Augustsson P; Bruus H; Laurell T
    Lab Chip; 2014 Aug; 14(15):2791-9. PubMed ID: 24895052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Generalized potential theory for close-range acoustic interactions in the Rayleigh limit.
    Sepehrirhnama S; Lim KM
    Phys Rev E; 2020 Oct; 102(4-1):043307. PubMed ID: 33212642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.