BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28840393)

  • 1. A matter of you versus me? Experiences of control in a joint go/no-go task.
    van der Weiden A; Liepelt R; van Haren NEM
    Psychol Res; 2019 Jul; 83(5):842-851. PubMed ID: 28840393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Motor-related cortical oscillations distinguish one's own from a partner's contributions to a joint action.
    Bolt NK; Loehr JD
    Biol Psychol; 2024 Jul; 190():108804. PubMed ID: 38670429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attention allocation and task representation during joint action planning.
    Kourtis D; Knoblich G; Woźniak M; Sebanz N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Oct; 26(10):2275-86. PubMed ID: 24702448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do you really represent my task? Sequential adaptation effects to unexpected events support referential coding for the joint Simon effect.
    Klempova B; Liepelt R
    Psychol Res; 2016 Jul; 80(4):449-63. PubMed ID: 25833374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How preschoolers and adults represent their joint action partner's behavior.
    Sacheli LM; Meyer M; Hartstra E; Bekkering H; Hunnius S
    Psychol Res; 2019 Jul; 83(5):863-877. PubMed ID: 29067520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Individual differences in action co-representation: not personal distress or subclinical psychotic experiences but sex composition modulates joint action performance.
    van der Weiden A; Aarts H; Prikken M; van Haren NE
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Feb; 234(2):499-510. PubMed ID: 26525711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Joint action goals reduce visuomotor interference effects from a partner's incongruent actions.
    Clarke S; McEllin L; Francová A; Székely M; Butterfill SA; Michael J
    Sci Rep; 2019 Oct; 9(1):15414. PubMed ID: 31659223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Two Brains in Action: Joint-Action Coding in the Primate Frontal Cortex.
    Ferrari-Toniolo S; Visco-Comandini F; Battaglia-Mayer A
    J Neurosci; 2019 May; 39(18):3514-3528. PubMed ID: 30804088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predictive representation of other people's actions in joint action planning: an EEG study.
    Kourtis D; Sebanz N; Knoblich G
    Soc Neurosci; 2013; 8(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 22671131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How a co-actor's task affects monitoring of own errors: evidence from a social event-related potential study.
    de Bruijn ER; Miedl SF; Bekkering H
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Jun; 211(3-4):397-404. PubMed ID: 21424844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Our actions in my mind: motor imagery of joint action.
    Vesper C; Knoblich G; Sebanz N
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Mar; 55():115-21. PubMed ID: 23751170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Priority for one's own stimulus in joint performance: evidence from an event-related potential study.
    Kato K; Yoshizaki K; Kimura Y
    Neuroreport; 2016 May; 27(8):564-7. PubMed ID: 27043796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rationality in Joint Action: Maximizing Coefficiency in Coordination.
    Török G; Pomiechowska B; Csibra G; Sebanz N
    Psychol Sci; 2019 Jun; 30(6):930-941. PubMed ID: 31088200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reciprocal information flow and role distribution support joint action coordination.
    Curioni A; Vesper C; Knoblich G; Sebanz N
    Cognition; 2019 Jun; 187():21-31. PubMed ID: 30797991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Social categorization and cooperation in motor joint action: evidence for a joint end-state comfort.
    Dötsch D; Schubö A
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Aug; 233(8):2323-34. PubMed ID: 25963752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Group membership affects spontaneous mental representation: failure to represent the out-group in a joint action task.
    McClung JS; Jentzsch I; Reicher SD
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e79178. PubMed ID: 24278119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The predictability of a partner's actions modulates the sense of joint agency.
    Bolt NK; Loehr JD
    Cognition; 2017 Apr; 161():60-65. PubMed ID: 28110236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inverting the joint Simon effect by intention.
    Kiernan D; Ray M; Welsh TN
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Oct; 19(5):914-20. PubMed ID: 22718258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Keys and seats: Spatial response coding underlying the joint spatial compatibility effect.
    Dittrich K; Dolk T; Rothe-Wulf A; Klauer KC; Prinz W
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Nov; 75(8):1725-36. PubMed ID: 23896690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perspective taking eliminates differences in co-representation of out-group members' actions.
    Müller BC; Kühn S; van Baaren RB; Dotsch R; Brass M; Dijksterhuis A
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Jun; 211(3-4):423-8. PubMed ID: 21465413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.