553 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28840485)
41. Incapacitated Surrogates: A New and Increasing Dilemma in Hospital Care.
Smith KL; Fedel P; Heitman J
J Clin Ethics; 2017; 28(4):279-289. PubMed ID: 29257763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Prior capacity of patients lacking decision making ability early in hospitalization: implications for advance directive administration. The SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments.
Wenger NS; Oye RK; Bellamy PE; Lynn J; Phillips RS; Desbiens NA; Kussin P; Youngner SJ
J Gen Intern Med; 1994 Oct; 9(10):539-43. PubMed ID: 7823223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Advance directives as acts of communication: a randomized controlled trial.
Ditto PH; Danks JH; Smucker WD; Bookwala J; Coppola KM; Dresser R; Fagerlin A; Gready RM; Houts RM; Lockhart LK; Zyzanski S
Arch Intern Med; 2001 Feb; 161(3):421-30. PubMed ID: 11176768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Risk Factors for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms in Surrogate Decision-Makers of Patients with Chronic Critical Illness.
Wendlandt B; Ceppe A; Choudhury S; Nelson JE; Cox CE; Hanson LC; Danis M; Tulsky JA; Carson SS
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2018 Dec; 15(12):1451-1458. PubMed ID: 30199658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Modal preferences predict elderly patients' life-sustaining treatment choices as well as patients' chosen surrogates do.
Smucker WD; Houts RM; Danks JH; Ditto PH; Fagerlin A; Coppola KM
Med Decis Making; 2000; 20(3):271-80. PubMed ID: 10929849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Using video images to improve the accuracy of surrogate decision-making: a randomized controlled trial.
Volandes AE; Mitchell SL; Gillick MR; Chang Y; Paasche-Orlow MK
J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2009 Oct; 10(8):575-80. PubMed ID: 19808156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Sex differences in surrogate decision-maker preferences for life-sustaining treatments of Japanese patients with heart failure.
Nakamura K; Kinugasa Y; Sugihara S; Hirai M; Yanagihara K; Haruki N; Matsubara K; Kato M; Yamamoto K
ESC Heart Fail; 2018 Dec; 5(6):1165-1172. PubMed ID: 30264449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Surrogates' agreement with patients' resuscitation preferences: effect of age, relationship, and SUPPORT intervention. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.
Marbella AM; Desbiens NA; Mueller-Rizner N; Layde PM
J Crit Care; 1998 Sep; 13(3):140-5. PubMed ID: 9758029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. How strictly do dialysis patients want their advance directives followed?
Sehgal A; Galbraith A; Chesney M; Schoenfeld P; Charles G; Lo B
JAMA; 1992 Jan; 267(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 1489360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Decision-making among the substitute decision makers in intensive care units: An investigation of decision control preferences and decisional conflicts.
Wu F; Zhuang Y; Chen X; Wen H; Tao W; Lao Y; Zhou H
J Adv Nurs; 2020 Sep; 76(9):2323-2335. PubMed ID: 32538477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Legal fundamentals of surrogate decision making.
Pope TM
Chest; 2012 Apr; 141(4):1074-1081. PubMed ID: 22474149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Surrogate Decision Makers Need Better Preparation for Their Role: Advice from Experienced Surrogates.
Bakke BM; Feuz MA; McMahan RD; Barnes DE; Li B; Volow AM; Powell J; Sudore RL
J Palliat Med; 2022 Jun; 25(6):857-863. PubMed ID: 35076297
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Overriding advance directives: A 20-year legal and ethical overview.
Banja J; Sumler M
J Healthc Risk Manag; 2019 Oct; 39(2):11-18. PubMed ID: 31433120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Surrogate decision making: do we have to trade off accuracy and procedural satisfaction?
Frey R; Hertwig R; Herzog SM
Med Decis Making; 2014 Feb; 34(2):258-69. PubMed ID: 23360917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Impact of advance directives and a health care proxy on doctors' decisions: a randomized trial.
Escher M; Perneger TV; Rudaz S; Dayer P; Perrier A
J Pain Symptom Manage; 2014 Jan; 47(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 23742734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Cross-sectional survey of surrogate decision-making in Japanese medical practice.
Tanaka M; Bito S; Enzo A; Okita T; Atsushi A
BMC Med Ethics; 2021 Sep; 22(1):128. PubMed ID: 34560873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Ethical issues in emergency care.
Arras J
Clin Geriatr Med; 1993 Aug; 9(3):655-64. PubMed ID: 8374863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Responding to surrogate requests that seem inconsistent with a patient's living will.
Vig EK; Sudore RL; Berg KM; Fromme EK; Arnold RM
J Pain Symptom Manage; 2011 Nov; 42(5):777-82. PubMed ID: 22045374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The Experience of Surrogate Decision Makers on Being Approached for Consent for Patient Participation in Research. A Multicenter Study.
Burns KE; Prats CJ; Maione M; Lanceta M; Zubrinich C; Jeffs L; Smith OM;
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2017 Feb; 14(2):238-245. PubMed ID: 27849142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Surrogates' predictions of seriously ill patients' resuscitation preferences.
Layde PM; Beam CA; Broste SK; Connors AF; Desbiens N; Lynn J; Phillips RS; Reding D; Teno J; Vidaillet H
Arch Fam Med; 1995 Jun; 4(6):518-23. PubMed ID: 7773427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
