These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28840604)

  • 1. Environmental complexity and the purging of deleterious alleles.
    Singh A; Agrawal AF; Rundle HD
    Evolution; 2017 Nov; 71(11):2714-2720. PubMed ID: 28840604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The purging of deleterious mutations in simple and complex mating environments.
    Colpitts J; Williscroft D; Sekhon HS; Rundle HD
    Biol Lett; 2017 Oct; 13(10):. PubMed ID: 29021319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sexual selection is ineffectual or inhibits the purging of deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Arbuthnott D; Rundle HD
    Evolution; 2012 Jul; 66(7):2127-37. PubMed ID: 22759290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of sexual selection on life-history traits: an experimental study on guppies.
    Pélabon C; Larsen LK; Bolstad GH; Viken Å; Fleming IA; Rosenqvist G
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Feb; 27(2):404-16. PubMed ID: 24417444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Testing for local adaptation in adult male and female fitness among populations evolved under different mate competition regimes.
    Yun L; Bayoumi M; Yang S; Chen PJ; Rundle HD; Agrawal AF
    Evolution; 2019 Aug; 73(8):1604-1616. PubMed ID: 31206649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mating density and the strength of sexual selection against deleterious alleles in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Sharp NP; Agrawal AF
    Evolution; 2008 Apr; 62(4):857-67. PubMed ID: 18221380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Competition for mates and the improvement of nonsexual fitness.
    Yun L; Chen PJ; Kwok KE; Angell CS; Rundle HD; Agrawal AF
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Jun; 115(26):6762-6767. PubMed ID: 29891650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sexual selection shapes development and maturation rates in Drosophila.
    Hollis B; Keller L; Kawecki TJ
    Evolution; 2017 Feb; 71(2):304-314. PubMed ID: 27883363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evolution of reduced post-copulatory molecular interactions in Drosophila populations lacking sperm competition.
    Hollis B; Houle D; Kawecki TJ
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Jan; 29(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 26395588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sexual selection on spontaneous mutations strengthens the between-sex genetic correlation for fitness.
    Allen SL; McGuigan K; Connallon T; Blows MW; Chenoweth SF
    Evolution; 2017 Oct; 71(10):2398-2409. PubMed ID: 28722119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sexual selection accelerates the elimination of a deleterious mutant in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Hollis B; Fierst JL; Houle D
    Evolution; 2009 Feb; 63(2):324-33. PubMed ID: 19154371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Purging the genome with sexual selection: reducing mutation load through selection on males.
    Whitlock MC; Agrawal AF
    Evolution; 2009 Mar; 63(3):569-82. PubMed ID: 19154364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatial heterogeneity in resources alters selective dynamics in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Wilson AE; Siddiqui A; Dworkin I
    Evolution; 2021 Jul; 75(7):1792-1804. PubMed ID: 33963761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Male-biased fitness effects of spontaneous mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Sharp NP; Agrawal AF
    Evolution; 2013 Apr; 67(4):1189-95. PubMed ID: 23550766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The physical environment mediates male harm and its effect on selection in females.
    Yun L; Chen PJ; Singh A; Agrawal AF; Rundle HD
    Proc Biol Sci; 2017 Jul; 284(1858):. PubMed ID: 28679725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sexual Selection Does Not Increase the Rate of Compensatory Adaptation to a Mutation Influencing a Secondary Sexual Trait in
    Chandler CH; Mammel A; Dworkin I
    G3 (Bethesda); 2020 May; 10(5):1541-1551. PubMed ID: 32122961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Populations with elevated mutation load do not benefit from the operation of sexual selection.
    Hollis B; Houle D
    J Evol Biol; 2011 Sep; 24(9):1918-26. PubMed ID: 21658188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How are deleterious mutations purged? Drift versus nonrandom mating.
    Glémin S
    Evolution; 2003 Dec; 57(12):2678-87. PubMed ID: 14761049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sexual selection and maintenance of sex: evidence from comparisons of rates of genomic accumulation of mutations and divergence of sex-related genes in sexual and hermaphroditic species of Caenorhabditis.
    Artieri CG; Haerty W; Gupta BP; Singh RS
    Mol Biol Evol; 2008 May; 25(5):972-9. PubMed ID: 18281268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sexual selection counteracts extinction of small populations of the bulb mites.
    Jarzebowska M; Radwan J
    Evolution; 2010 May; 64(5):1283-9. PubMed ID: 19930452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.