These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28840604)

  • 21. Male cognitive performance declines in the absence of sexual selection.
    Hollis B; Kawecki TJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Apr; 281(1781):20132873. PubMed ID: 24573848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of larval crowding on adult mating behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Ribó G; Ocaña J; Prevosti A
    Heredity (Edinb); 1989 Oct; 63 ( Pt 2)():195-202. PubMed ID: 2509403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Genotype-by-environment interactions for female preference.
    Narraway C; Hunt J; Wedell N; Hosken DJ
    J Evol Biol; 2010 Dec; 23(12):2550-7. PubMed ID: 20939836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sexual selection and immune function in Drosophila melanogaster.
    McKean KA; Nunney L
    Evolution; 2008 Feb; 62(2):386-400. PubMed ID: 18070086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Transcriptome-wide effects of sexual selection on the fate of new mutations.
    Collet JM; Blows MW; McGuigan K
    Evolution; 2015 Nov; 69(11):2905-16. PubMed ID: 26389669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reduced inbreeding depression due to historical inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster: evidence for purging.
    Swindell WR; Bouzat JL
    J Evol Biol; 2006 Jul; 19(4):1257-64. PubMed ID: 16780526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Spatial environmental complexity mediates sexual conflict and sexual selection in
    Malek HL; Long TAF
    Ecol Evol; 2019 Mar; 9(5):2651-2663. PubMed ID: 30891206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Does segregating variation in sexual or microhabitat preferences lead to non-random mating within a population of Drosophila melanogaster?
    Foley BR; Genissel A; Kristy HL; Nuzhdin SV
    Biol Lett; 2010 Feb; 6(1):102-5. PubMed ID: 19692395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sexual selection fails to promote adaptation to a new environment.
    Holland B
    Evolution; 2002 Apr; 56(4):721-30. PubMed ID: 12038530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Experimental removal of sexual selection leads to decreased investment in an immune component in female Tribolium castaneum.
    Hangartner S; Michalczyk Ł; Gage MJ; Martin OY
    Infect Genet Evol; 2015 Jul; 33():212-8. PubMed ID: 25958137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Additive genetic breeding values correlate with the load of partially deleterious mutations.
    Tomkins JL; Penrose MA; Greeff J; LeBas NR
    Science; 2010 May; 328(5980):892-4. PubMed ID: 20466931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Rapid genomic changes in Drosophila melanogaster adapting to desiccation stress in an experimental evolution system.
    Kang L; Aggarwal DD; Rashkovetsky E; Korol AB; Michalak P
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Mar; 17():233. PubMed ID: 26979755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. No evidence of positive assortative mating for genetic quality in fruit flies.
    Sharp NP; Whitlock MC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2019 Oct; 286(1912):20191474. PubMed ID: 31575372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Estimation of genetic purging under competitive conditions.
    López-Cortegano E; Vilas A; Caballero A; García-Dorado A
    Evolution; 2016 Aug; 70(8):1856-70. PubMed ID: 27302839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The efficacy of good genes sexual selection under environmental change.
    Martinossi-Allibert I; Rueffler C; Arnqvist G; Berger D
    Proc Biol Sci; 2019 Feb; 286(1896):20182313. PubMed ID: 30963930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effects of male harm vary with female quality and environmental complexity in
    MacPherson A; Yun L; Barrera TS; Agrawal AF; Rundle HD
    Biol Lett; 2018 Aug; 14(8):. PubMed ID: 30158138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Mating behavior as an indicator of quality of Drosophila subobscura males?
    Savic Veselinovic M; Pavkovic-Lucic S; Kurbalija Novicic Z; Jelic M; Stamenkovic-Radak M; Andjelkovic M
    Insect Sci; 2017 Feb; 24(1):122-132. PubMed ID: 26235310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The roles of life-history selection and sexual selection in the adaptive evolution of mating behavior in a beetle.
    Maklakov AA; Cayetano L; Brooks RC; Bonduriansky R
    Evolution; 2010 May; 64(5):1273-82. PubMed ID: 19930453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Selection, epistasis, and parent-of-origin effects on deleterious mutations across environments in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Wang AD; Sharp NP; Spencer CC; Tedman-Aucoin K; Agrawal AF
    Am Nat; 2009 Dec; 174(6):863-74. PubMed ID: 19852616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of parasites on sex differences in selection.
    Sharp NP; Vincent CM
    Heredity (Edinb); 2015 Apr; 114(4):367-72. PubMed ID: 25649503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.