179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28841595)
21. Preoperative diagnostic for palatal implants: Is CT or CBCT necessary?
Jung BA; Wehrbein H; Wagner W; Kunkel M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Jun; 14(3):400-5. PubMed ID: 20132245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Predictive factors of vertical bone depth in the paramedian palate of adolescents.
King KS; Lam EW; Faulkner MG; Heo G; Major PW
Angle Orthod; 2006 Sep; 76(5):745-51. PubMed ID: 17029505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Palatal bone thickness and associated factors in adult miniscrew placements: A cone-beam computed tomography study.
Poon YC; Chang HP; Tseng YC; Chou ST; Cheng JH; Liu PH; Pan CY
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2015 May; 31(5):265-70. PubMed ID: 25910562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Quantitative cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of hard and soft tissue thicknesses in the midpalatal suture region to facilitate orthodontic mini-implant placement.
Oh SH; Lee SR; Choi JY; Kim SH; Hwang EH; Nelson G
Korean J Orthod; 2021 Jul; 51(4):260-269. PubMed ID: 34275882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Radiological evaluation of the bone and soft tissue thicknesses of the palate for using a miniscrew-supported maxillary skeletal expander.
Yu SK; Cho Y; Seo YS; Kim JS; Kim DK; Kim HJ
Surg Radiol Anat; 2021 Jun; 43(6):1001-1008. PubMed ID: 33386930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Assessment of the bone thickness of the palate on cone-beam computed tomography for placement of miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion appliances.
Negrisoli S; Angelieri F; Gonçalves JR; da Silva HDP; Maltagliati LÁ; Raphaelli Nahás-Scocate AC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Jun; 161(6):849-857. PubMed ID: 35151529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of median and paramedian regions for planning palatal mini-implants: a study in vivo using cone beam computed tomography.
de Rezende Barbosa GL; Ramírez-Sotelo LR; Távora DM; Almeida SM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 43(10):1265-8. PubMed ID: 24846198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Palatal bone density in adult subjects: implications for mini-implant placement.
Moon SH; Park SH; Lim WH; Chun YS
Angle Orthod; 2010 Jan; 80(1):137-44. PubMed ID: 19852653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Determination of sex dimorphisms of the thickness of the hard palate in adolescence using computed tomography: Pilot study.
Aleshkina O; Suetenkov D; Dydykin S; Vasil'ev Y; Paulsen F; Firsova I; Bikbaeva T; Polkovova I
Ann Anat; 2021 Nov; 238():151764. PubMed ID: 34004269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Quantitative investigation of palatal bone depth and cortical bone thickness for mini-implant placement in adults.
Baumgaertel S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 19577156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cortical bone thickness and bone depth of the posterior palatal alveolar process for mini-implant insertion in adults.
Baumgaertel S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Dec; 140(6):806-11. PubMed ID: 22133945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of the palatal bone for placement of orthodontic mini-implants in Japanese adults.
Nakahara K; Matsunaga S; Abe S; Tamatsu Y; Kageyama I; Hashimoto M; Ide Y
Cranio; 2012 Jan; 30(1):72-9. PubMed ID: 22435178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of palatal support tissues for placement of orthodontic mini-implants in mouth breathers with high-narrow palates versus nose breathers with normal palates: a retrospective study.
Kang Q; Cha C; Huang D; Zuo S; Yan X
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Mar; 24(3):1259-1267. PubMed ID: 31302770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of Palatal Bone Thickness and Its Relationship with Palatal Vault Depth for Mini-Implant Insertion Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Images.
Faegheh G; Khosravifard N; Maleki D; Hosseini SK
Turk J Orthod; 2022 Jun; 35(2):120-126. PubMed ID: 35788436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of palatal bone depth, cortical bone, and mucosa thickness for optimal orthodontic miniscrew placement performed according to the third palatal ruga clinical reference.
Nucera R; Costa S; Bellocchio AM; Barbera S; Drago S; Silvestrini A; Migliorati M
Eur J Orthod; 2022 Sep; 44(5):530-536. PubMed ID: 35201320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of interradicular space, soft tissue, and hard tissue of the posterior palatal alveolar process for orthodontic mini-implant, using cone-beam computed tomography.
Lee JA; Ahn HW; Oh SH; Park KH; Kim SH; Nelson G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Apr; 159(4):460-469. PubMed ID: 33526299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Success rate of infrazygomatic crest mini-implants used for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth in first premolar extraction cases: A three-dimensional comparative prospective clinical trial between adolescents and young adults.
Gopal H; Das SK; Barik AK; Mishra M; Rath SK; Samal R; Sharma G
J World Fed Orthod; 2023 Oct; 12(5):197-206. PubMed ID: 37558596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Quantitative evaluation of palatal bone thickness for the placement of orthodontic miniscrews in adults with different facial types.
Wang Y; Qiu Y; Liu H; He J; Fan X
Saudi Med J; 2017 Oct; 38(10):1051-1057. PubMed ID: 28917071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Anatomic site evaluation of the palatal bone for temporary orthodontic anchorage devices.
Wehrbein H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jul; 19(7):653-6. PubMed ID: 18492079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Anatomical assessment by cone beam computed tomography with the use of lateral cephalograms to analyse the vertical bone height of the anterior palate for orthodontic mini-implants.
Möhlhenrich SC; Kniha K; Peters F; Chhatwani S; Prescher A; Hölzle F; Modabber A; Danesh G
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 Feb; 24(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 32608152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
