170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28841821)
1. Influence of epistasis on response to genomic selection using complete sequence data.
Forneris NS; Vitezica ZG; Legarra A; Pérez-Enciso M
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Aug; 49(1):66. PubMed ID: 28841821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The long-term effects of genomic selection: 1. Response to selection, additive genetic variance, and genetic architecture.
Wientjes YCJ; Bijma P; Calus MPL; Zwaan BJ; Vitezica ZG; van den Heuvel J
Genet Sel Evol; 2022 Mar; 54(1):19. PubMed ID: 35255802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The action of stabilizing selection, mutation, and drift on epistatic quantitative traits.
Avila V; Pérez-Figueroa A; Caballero A; Hill WG; García-Dorado A; López-Fanjul C
Evolution; 2014 Jul; 68(7):1974-87. PubMed ID: 24689841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of epistatic gene interactions in the response to selection and the evolution of evolvability.
Carter AJ; Hermisson J; Hansen TF
Theor Popul Biol; 2005 Nov; 68(3):179-96. PubMed ID: 16122771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Orthogonal Estimates of Variances for Additive, Dominance, and Epistatic Effects in Populations.
Vitezica ZG; Legarra A; Toro MA; Varona L
Genetics; 2017 Jul; 206(3):1297-1307. PubMed ID: 28522540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of non-additive genetic interactions on selection in multi-locus genetic models.
Hallander J; Waldmann P
Heredity (Edinb); 2007 Jun; 98(6):349-59. PubMed ID: 17327874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The long-term effects of genomic selection: 2. Changes in allele frequencies of causal loci and new mutations.
Wientjes YCJ; Bijma P; van den Heuvel J; Zwaan BJ; Vitezica ZG; Calus MPL
Genetics; 2023 Aug; 225(1):. PubMed ID: 37506255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of gene interactions on the long-term response to selection.
Paixão T; Barton NH
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Apr; 113(16):4422-7. PubMed ID: 27044080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genomic prediction of hybrid crops allows disentangling dominance and epistasis.
González-Diéguez D; Legarra A; Charcosset A; Moreau L; Lehermeier C; Teyssèdre S; Vitezica ZG
Genetics; 2021 May; 218(1):. PubMed ID: 33864072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Phantom Epistasis in Genomic Selection: On the Predictive Ability of Epistatic Models.
Schrauf MF; Martini JWR; Simianer H; de Los Campos G; Cantet R; Freudenthal J; Korte A; Munilla S
G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Sep; 10(9):3137-3145. PubMed ID: 32709618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Imperfect Linkage Disequilibrium Generates Phantom Epistasis (& Perils of Big Data).
de Los Campos G; Sorensen DA; Toro MA
G3 (Bethesda); 2019 May; 9(5):1429-1436. PubMed ID: 30877081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An evolutionary perspective on epistasis and the missing heritability.
Hemani G; Knott S; Haley C
PLoS Genet; 2013 Feb; 9(2):e1003295. PubMed ID: 23509438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bayesian reversible-jump for epistasis analysis in genomic studies.
Balestre M; de Souza CL
BMC Genomics; 2016 Dec; 17(1):1012. PubMed ID: 27938339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. "Conversion" of epistatic into additive genetic variance in finite populations and possible impact on long-term selection response.
Hill WG
J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Jun; 134(3):196-201. PubMed ID: 28508485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perspective: Sign epistasis and genetic constraint on evolutionary trajectories.
Weinreich DM; Watson RA; Chao L
Evolution; 2005 Jun; 59(6):1165-74. PubMed ID: 16050094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improvement of genomic prediction in advanced wheat breeding lines by including additive-by-additive epistasis.
Raffo MA; Sarup P; Guo X; Liu H; Andersen JR; Orabi J; Jahoor A; Jensen J
Theor Appl Genet; 2022 Mar; 135(3):965-978. PubMed ID: 34973112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A simple model of co-evolutionary dynamics caused by epistatic selection.
Schlosser G; Wagner GP
J Theor Biol; 2008 Jan; 250(1):48-65. PubMed ID: 17923137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evolution of genetic architecture under directional selection.
Hansen TF; Alvarez-Castro JM; Carter AJ; Hermisson J; Wagner GP
Evolution; 2006 Aug; 60(8):1523-36. PubMed ID: 17017054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How does epistasis influence the response to selection?
Barton NH
Heredity (Edinb); 2017 Jan; 118(1):96-109. PubMed ID: 27901509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Molecular signature of epistatic selection: interrogating genetic interactions in the sex-ratio meiotic drive of Drosophila simulans.
Chevin LM; Bastide H; Montchamp-Moreau C; Hospital F
Genet Res (Camb); 2009 Jun; 91(3):171-82. PubMed ID: 19589187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
