These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28841821)

  • 21. Epistasis for quantitative traits in Drosophila.
    Mackay TF
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1253():47-70. PubMed ID: 25403527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Epistasis in polygenic traits and the evolution of genetic architecture under stabilizing selection.
    Hermisson J; Hansen TF; Wagner GP
    Am Nat; 2003 May; 161(5):708-34. PubMed ID: 12858280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mutation load under additive fitness effects.
    Bergen AC
    Genet Res (Camb); 2015 Feb; 97():e2. PubMed ID: 26788801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Application of Response Surface Methods To Determine Conditions for Optimal Genomic Prediction.
    Howard R; Carriquiry AL; Beavis WD
    G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Sep; 7(9):3103-3113. PubMed ID: 28720710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evolutionary dynamics in the two-locus two-allele model with weak selection.
    Pontz M; Hofbauer J; Bürger R
    J Math Biol; 2018 Jan; 76(1-2):151-203. PubMed ID: 28547213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction.
    Wientjes YC; Veerkamp RF; Bijma P; Bovenhuis H; Schrooten C; Calus MP
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):5. PubMed ID: 25885467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessing non-additive effects in GBLUP model.
    Vieira IC; Dos Santos JPR; Pires LPM; Lima BM; Gonçalves FMA; Balestre M
    Genet Mol Res; 2017 May; 16(2):. PubMed ID: 28510252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of varying epistasis on the evolution of recombination.
    Kouyos RD; Otto SP; Bonhoeffer S
    Genetics; 2006 Jun; 173(2):589-97. PubMed ID: 16547114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The additive genetic variance after bottlenecks is affected by the number of loci involved in epistatic interactions.
    Naciri-Graven Y; Goudet J
    Evolution; 2003 Apr; 57(4):706-16. PubMed ID: 12778542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. On the evolution of epistasis II: a generalized Wright-Kimura framework.
    Liberman U; Puniyani A; Feldman MW
    Theor Popul Biol; 2007 Mar; 71(2):230-8. PubMed ID: 17141817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Why epistasis is important for selection and adaptation.
    Hansen TF
    Evolution; 2013 Dec; 67(12):3501-11. PubMed ID: 24299403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Haplotype-Based Genome-Wide Prediction Models Exploit Local Epistatic Interactions Among Markers.
    Jiang Y; Schmidt RH; Reif JC
    G3 (Bethesda); 2018 May; 8(5):1687-1699. PubMed ID: 29549092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. On epistasis: why it is unimportant in polygenic directional selection.
    Crow JF
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2010 Apr; 365(1544):1241-4. PubMed ID: 20308099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Genotypic variation for a quantitative character maintained under stabilizing selection without mutations: epistasis.
    Gimelfarb A
    Genetics; 1989 Sep; 123(1):217-27. PubMed ID: 2806884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Selection biases the prevalence and type of epistasis along adaptive trajectories.
    Draghi JA; Plotkin JB
    Evolution; 2013 Nov; 67(11):3120-31. PubMed ID: 24151997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Locally epistatic genomic relationship matrices for genomic association and prediction.
    Akdemir D; Jannink JL
    Genetics; 2015 Mar; 199(3):857-71. PubMed ID: 25614606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Modeling the evolution of genetic architecture: A continuum of alleles model with pairwise AxA epistasis.
    Wagner GP; Mezey J
    J Theor Biol; 2000 Mar; 203(2):163-75. PubMed ID: 10704300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Screening for epistatic selection signatures: A simulation study.
    Id-Lahoucine S; Molina A; Cánovas A; Casellas J
    Sci Rep; 2019 Jan; 9(1):1026. PubMed ID: 30705409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Modeling Epistasis in Genomic Selection.
    Jiang Y; Reif JC
    Genetics; 2015 Oct; 201(2):759-68. PubMed ID: 26219298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Multilocus population genetics with weak epistasis. II. Equilibrium properties of multilocus models: what is the unit of selection?
    Hastings A
    Genetics; 1986 Jan; 112(1):157-71. PubMed ID: 3943708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.