These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Epistasis in polygenic traits and the evolution of genetic architecture under stabilizing selection. Hermisson J; Hansen TF; Wagner GP Am Nat; 2003 May; 161(5):708-34. PubMed ID: 12858280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Mutation load under additive fitness effects. Bergen AC Genet Res (Camb); 2015 Feb; 97():e2. PubMed ID: 26788801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Application of Response Surface Methods To Determine Conditions for Optimal Genomic Prediction. Howard R; Carriquiry AL; Beavis WD G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Sep; 7(9):3103-3113. PubMed ID: 28720710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evolutionary dynamics in the two-locus two-allele model with weak selection. Pontz M; Hofbauer J; Bürger R J Math Biol; 2018 Jan; 76(1-2):151-203. PubMed ID: 28547213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Assessing non-additive effects in GBLUP model. Vieira IC; Dos Santos JPR; Pires LPM; Lima BM; Gonçalves FMA; Balestre M Genet Mol Res; 2017 May; 16(2):. PubMed ID: 28510252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of varying epistasis on the evolution of recombination. Kouyos RD; Otto SP; Bonhoeffer S Genetics; 2006 Jun; 173(2):589-97. PubMed ID: 16547114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The additive genetic variance after bottlenecks is affected by the number of loci involved in epistatic interactions. Naciri-Graven Y; Goudet J Evolution; 2003 Apr; 57(4):706-16. PubMed ID: 12778542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. On the evolution of epistasis II: a generalized Wright-Kimura framework. Liberman U; Puniyani A; Feldman MW Theor Popul Biol; 2007 Mar; 71(2):230-8. PubMed ID: 17141817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Why epistasis is important for selection and adaptation. Hansen TF Evolution; 2013 Dec; 67(12):3501-11. PubMed ID: 24299403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. On epistasis: why it is unimportant in polygenic directional selection. Crow JF Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2010 Apr; 365(1544):1241-4. PubMed ID: 20308099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Genotypic variation for a quantitative character maintained under stabilizing selection without mutations: epistasis. Gimelfarb A Genetics; 1989 Sep; 123(1):217-27. PubMed ID: 2806884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Selection biases the prevalence and type of epistasis along adaptive trajectories. Draghi JA; Plotkin JB Evolution; 2013 Nov; 67(11):3120-31. PubMed ID: 24151997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Locally epistatic genomic relationship matrices for genomic association and prediction. Akdemir D; Jannink JL Genetics; 2015 Mar; 199(3):857-71. PubMed ID: 25614606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Modeling the evolution of genetic architecture: A continuum of alleles model with pairwise AxA epistasis. Wagner GP; Mezey J J Theor Biol; 2000 Mar; 203(2):163-75. PubMed ID: 10704300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Multilocus population genetics with weak epistasis. II. Equilibrium properties of multilocus models: what is the unit of selection? Hastings A Genetics; 1986 Jan; 112(1):157-71. PubMed ID: 3943708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]