These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28842289)

  • 1. Favorable and publicly funded studies are more likely to be published: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Canestaro WJ; Hendrix N; Bansal A; Sullivan SD; Devine EB; Carlson JJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Dec; 92():58-68. PubMed ID: 28842289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extent of non-publication in cohorts of studies approved by research ethics committees or included in trial registries.
    Schmucker C; Schell LK; Portalupi S; Oeller P; Cabrera L; Bassler D; Schwarzer G; Scherer RW; Antes G; von Elm E; Meerpohl JJ;
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e114023. PubMed ID: 25536072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Extent of publication bias in different categories of research cohorts: a meta-analysis of empirical studies.
    Song F; Parekh-Bhurke S; Hooper L; Loke YK; Ryder JJ; Sutton AJ; Hing CB; Harvey I
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2009 Nov; 9():79. PubMed ID: 19941636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Publication bias in meta-analyses from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
    Kicinski M; Springate DA; Kontopantelis E
    Stat Med; 2015 Sep; 34(20):2781-93. PubMed ID: 25988604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Industry sponsorship and publication bias among animal studies evaluating the effects of statins on atherosclerosis and bone outcomes: a meta-analysis.
    Anglemyer AT; Krauth D; Bero L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Mar; 15():12. PubMed ID: 25880564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of publication bias in meta-analyses of cardiovascular diseases.
    Palma S; Delgado-Rodriguez M
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2005 Oct; 59(10):864-9. PubMed ID: 16166360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The fate of manuscripts rejected by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume).
    Okike K; Kocher MS; Nwachukwu BU; Mehlman CT; Heckman JD; Bhandari M
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Sep; 94(17):e130. PubMed ID: 22992859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. NIH clinical trials and publication bias.
    Dickersin K; Min YI
    Online J Curr Clin Trials; 1993 Apr; Doc No 50():[4967 words; 53 paragraphs]. PubMed ID: 8306005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Confidence intervals for random effects meta-analysis and robustness to publication bias.
    Henmi M; Copas JB
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(29):2969-83. PubMed ID: 20963748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Non-publication and publication bias in reproductive medicine: a cohort analysis.
    Lensen S; Jordan V; Showell M; Showell E; Shen V; Venetis C; Farquhar C
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Aug; 32(8):1658-1666. PubMed ID: 28854591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. N-acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: publication bias perpetuated by meta-analyses.
    Vaitkus PT; Brar C
    Am Heart J; 2007 Feb; 153(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 17239689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Publication bias in the anesthesiology literature.
    De Oliveira GS; Chang R; Kendall MC; Fitzgerald PC; McCarthy RJ
    Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1042-8. PubMed ID: 22344237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Commercially funded and United States-based research is more likely to be published; good-quality studies with negative outcomes are not.
    Lynch JR; Cunningham MR; Warme WJ; Schaad DC; Wolf FM; Leopold SS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 May; 89(5):1010-8. PubMed ID: 17473138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Publication bias in dermatology systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Atakpo P; Vassar M
    J Dermatol Sci; 2016 May; 82(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 26925817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does Cancer Literature Reflect Multidisciplinary Practice? A Systematic Review of Oncology Studies in the Medical Literature Over a 20-Year Period.
    Holliday EB; Ahmed AA; Yoo SK; Jagsi R; Hoffman KE
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jul; 92(4):721-31. PubMed ID: 26104927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Association between industry funding and statistically significant pro-industry findings in medical and surgical randomized trials.
    Bhandari M; Busse JW; Jackowski D; Montori VM; Schünemann H; Sprague S; Mears D; Schemitsch EH; Heels-Ansdell D; Devereaux PJ
    CMAJ; 2004 Feb; 170(4):477-80. PubMed ID: 14970094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Publication bias in recent meta-analyses.
    Kicinski M
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e81823. PubMed ID: 24363797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Publication probability of a study on odds ratio value circumstantial evidence for publication bias in medical study areas.
    Sugita M; Yamaguchi N; Izuno T; Kanamori M; Kasuga H
    Tokai J Exp Clin Med; 1994 Sep; 19(1-2):29-37. PubMed ID: 7660381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Publication of statistically significant research findings in prosthodontics & implant dentistry in the context of other dental specialties.
    Papageorgiou SN; Kloukos D; Petridis H; Pandis N
    J Dent; 2015 Oct; 43(10):1195-202. PubMed ID: 26279252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.