These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28842834)

  • 1. Knowing where is different from knowing what: Distinct response time profiles and accuracy effects for target location, orientation, and color probability.
    Jabar SB; Filipowicz A; Anderson B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Nov; 79(8):2338-2353. PubMed ID: 28842834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of probabilistic feature cueing depends on the level of cue abstraction.
    Dombert PL; Fink GR; Vossel S
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Mar; 234(3):685-94. PubMed ID: 26586268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection costs and contingent attentional capture.
    Schönhammer JG; Kerzel D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):429-437. PubMed ID: 27896707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Not all probabilities are equivalent: Evidence from orientation versus spatial probability learning.
    Jabar SB; Anderson B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 May; 43(5):853-867. PubMed ID: 28230399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rapid and reflexive feature-based attention.
    Lin JY; Hubert-Wallander B; Murray SO; Boynton GM
    J Vis; 2011 Oct; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 22010204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distinct roles of the intraparietal sulcus and temporoparietal junction in attentional capture from distractor features: An individual differences approach.
    Painter DR; Dux PE; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jul; 74():50-62. PubMed ID: 25724234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neural correlates of spatial and non-spatial inhibition of return (IOR) in attentional orienting.
    Zhou X; Chen Q
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Sep; 46(11):2766-75. PubMed ID: 18597795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Feature specificity in attentional capture by size and color.
    Harris AM; Remington RW; Becker SI
    J Vis; 2013 May; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 23650630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attentional modulation of perceptual comparison for feature binding.
    Kuo BC; Rotshtein P; Yeh YY
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Dec; 77(3):335-44. PubMed ID: 22055622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Probability shapes perceptual precision: A study in orientation estimation.
    Jabar SB; Anderson B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1666-79. PubMed ID: 26280261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What is "odd" in Posner's location-cueing paradigm? Neural responses to unexpected location and feature changes compared.
    Vossel S; Weidner R; Thiel CM; Fink GR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jan; 21(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 18476756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multiple cueing dissociates location- and feature-based repetition effects.
    Hu K; Zhan J; Li B; He S; Samuel AG
    Vision Res; 2014 Aug; 101():73-81. PubMed ID: 24907677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bias corrected double judgment accuracy during spatial attention cueing: unmasked stimuli with non-predictive and semi-predictive cues.
    Pack W; Klein SA; Carney T
    Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():213-25. PubMed ID: 25130410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attentional effects on orientation judgements are dependent on memory consolidation processes.
    Haskell C; Anderson B
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016 Nov; 69(11):2147-65. PubMed ID: 26595533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Orienting attention to locations in internal representations.
    Griffin IC; Nobre AC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Nov; 15(8):1176-94. PubMed ID: 14709235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Temporal dissociation between the focal and orientation components of spatial attention in central and peripheral vision.
    Albonico A; Malaspina M; Bricolo E; Martelli M; Daini R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Nov; 171():85-92. PubMed ID: 27743522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal dynamics of attentional control settings in patients with spatial neglect.
    Ptak R; Golay L
    Brain Res; 2006 May; 1092(1):190-7. PubMed ID: 16643863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Saccades and smooth pursuit eye movements trigger equivalent gaze-cued orienting effects.
    Langton SR; McIntyre AH; Hancock PJ; Leder H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Sep; 71(9):1860-1872. PubMed ID: 28760076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The ignoring paradox: cueing distractor features leads first to selection, then to inhibition of to-be-ignored items.
    Moher J; Egeth HE
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Nov; 74(8):1590-605. PubMed ID: 22893004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the time course of spatial cueing: Dissociating between a set for fast reorienting and a set for cue-target segregation.
    Martín-Arévalo E; Funes MJ; Lupiáñez J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Feb; 203():103004. PubMed ID: 31935658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.