71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28843222)
1. Accuracy of Cervical Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid Guide for 4-Quadrant Random Cervical Biopsies by General Practitioners in Women with Abnormal Pap Smears.
Suwansura P; Darojn D
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2017 Aug; 18(8):2063-2066. PubMed ID: 28843222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing visual inspection with acetic acid plus random cervical biopsy plus endocervical curettage to colposcopic directed biopsy plus endocervical curettage in detecting cervical lesions in low-resource settings.
Puntachai P; Darojn D; Chumworathayi B; Chaousriku W
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(10):2665-8. PubMed ID: 22320971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Visual inspection with acetic acid and cytology as screening methods for cervical lesions in Cameroon.
Doh AS; Nkele NN; Achu P; Essimbi F; Essame O; Nkegoum B
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2005 May; 89(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 15847890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Direct visual inspection of the cervix with Lugol iodine for the detection of premalignant lesions.
El-Shalakany AH; Saeed MM; Abdel-Aal MR; El-Nakeeb AH; Noseirat N; Ayyad SB; El Din ZS
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2008 Jul; 12(3):193-8. PubMed ID: 18596460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of visual inspection and Papanicolau (PAP) smears for cervical cancer screening in Honduras: should PAP smears be abandoned?
Perkins RB; Langrish SM; Stern LJ; Figueroa J; Simon CJ
Trop Med Int Health; 2007 Sep; 12(9):1018-25. PubMed ID: 17875013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of cervical cytology and colposcopy in detecting cervical glandular neoplasia.
Ullal A; Roberts M; Bulmer JN; Mathers ME; Wadehra V
Cytopathology; 2009 Dec; 20(6):359-66. PubMed ID: 18557985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Pap smear, visual inspection with acetic acid, and digital cervicography as cervical screening strategies.
Khodakarami N; Farzaneh F; Aslani F; Alizadeh K
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Nov; 284(5):1247-52. PubMed ID: 21188404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), Lugol's iodine (VILI), cervical cytology and HPV testing as cervical screening tools in Latin America. This report refers to partial results from the LAMS (Latin AMerican Screening) study.
Sarian LO; Derchain SF; Naud P; Roteli-Martins C; Longatto-Filho A; Tatti S; Branca M; Erzen M; Serpa-Hammes L; Matos J; Gontijo R; Bragança JF; Lima TP; Maeda MY; Lörincz A; Dores GB; Costa S; Syrjänen S; Syrjänen K
J Med Screen; 2005; 12(3):142-9. PubMed ID: 16156945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of a self-administered tampon ThinPrep test with conventional pap smears for cervical cytology.
Budge M; Halford J; Haran M; Mein J; Wright G
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Jun; 45(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 15904447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contribution of Exocervical Biopsy, Endocervical Curettage, and Colposcopic Grading in Diagnosing High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.
Diedrich JT; Felix JC; Lonky NM
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2016 Jan; 20(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 24477170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Visual inspection of the uterine cervix after the application of acetic acid in the detection of cervical carcinoma and its precursors.
Sankaranarayanan R; Wesley R; Somanathan T; Dhakad N; Shyamalakumary B; Amma NS; Parkin DM; Nair MK
Cancer; 1998 Nov; 83(10):2150-6. PubMed ID: 9827719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Study of accuracy of colposcopy in VIA and HPV detection-based cervical cancer screening program.
Ghosh I; Mittal S; Banerjee D; Singh P; Dasgupta S; Chatterjee S; Biswas J; Panda C; Basu P
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2014 Dec; 54(6):570-5. PubMed ID: 25476810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing the results of Pap smear and Direct Visual Inspection (DVI) with 5% acetic acid in cervical cancer screening.
Pourasad-Shahrak S; Salehi-Pourmehr H; Mostafa-Garebaghi P; Asghari-Jafarabadi M; Malakouti J; Haghsay M
Niger Med J; 2015; 56(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 25657491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Study on the value assessment of various screening programs regarding cervical cancer screening strategy in the rural areas of China].
Li LY; Qiao ZQ; Zhang MF; Yang JP; Bao YP; An YT; Lei J; Xiong NH; Yu XH; Zhang X; Pan QJ; Qiao YL
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Oct; 28(10):964-7. PubMed ID: 18399140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of visual inspection of cervix and Pap smear for cervical cancer screening.
Tayyeb R; Khawaja NP; Malik N
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2003 Apr; 13(4):201-3. PubMed ID: 12718787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy of visual inspection of the cervix using acetic acid in cervical cancer screening: a comparison with cervical cytology.
Akinola OI; Fabamwo AO; Oshodi YA; Banjo AA; Odusanya O; Gbadegesin A; Tayo A
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Oct; 27(7):703-5. PubMed ID: 17999297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of HPV test versus conventional and automation-assisted Pap screening as potential screening tools for preventing cervical cancer.
Nieminen P; Vuorma S; Viikki M; Hakama M; Anttila A
BJOG; 2004 Aug; 111(8):842-8. PubMed ID: 15270934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Follow-up of women with cervical cytological abnormalities showing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: a nationwide cohort study.
Sundström K; Lu D; Elfström KM; Wang J; Andrae B; Dillner J; Sparén P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):48.e1-48.e15. PubMed ID: 27457115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The utility of endocervical curettage: does routine ECC at the time of colposcopy for low-grade cytologic abnormalities improve diagnosis of high-grade disease?
Rose JD; Byun SY; Sims SM; Davis JD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 206(6):530.e1-3. PubMed ID: 22541611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of visual inspection with acetic acid for cervical cancer screening.
Sauvaget C; Fayette JM; Muwonge R; Wesley R; Sankaranarayanan R
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2011 Apr; 113(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 21257169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
