131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28843405)
1. Intracanal temperature changes during bone preparations close to and penetrating the inferior alveolar canal: Drills versus piezosurgery.
Szalma J; Vajta L; Lempel E; Tóth Á; Jeges S; Olasz L
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Oct; 45(10):1622-1631. PubMed ID: 28843405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tooth sectioning for coronectomy: how to perform?
Szalma J; Vajta L; Olasz L; Lempel E
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Feb; 23(2):519-527. PubMed ID: 29691663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bone heat generated using conventional implant drills versus piezosurgery unit during apical cortical plate perforation.
Lajolo C; Valente NA; Romandini WG; Petruzzi M; Verdugo F; D'Addona A
J Periodontol; 2018 Jun; 89(6):661-668. PubMed ID: 29520833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intraosseous Heat Production and Preparation Efficiency of Surgical Tungsten Carbide Round Drills: The Effect of Coronectomy on Drill Wear.
Szalma J; Kiss C; Gurdán Z; Tóth Á; Olasz L; Jakse N
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Mar; 74(3):442-52. PubMed ID: 26704431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Temperature variations during bone removal procedures similar to third molar extraction using different instruments.
Bisson GB; Sanches IM; Ciaramicolo NO; Ferreira Junior O
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Jun; 62(5):459-463. PubMed ID: 38670905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of conventional twist drill protocol and piezosurgery for implant insertion: an ex vivo study on different bone types.
Sagheb K; Kumar VV; Azaripour A; Walter C; Al-Nawas B; Kämmerer PW
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Feb; 28(2):207-213. PubMed ID: 26799448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Heat production by 3 implant drill systems after repeated drilling and sterilization.
Chacon GE; Bower DL; Larsen PE; McGlumphy EA; Beck FM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Feb; 64(2):265-9. PubMed ID: 16413899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of irrigation and stainless steel drills on dental implant bed heat generation.
Bullon B; Bueno EF; Herrero M; Fernandez-Palacin A; Rios JV; Bullon P; Gil FJ
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2015 Feb; 26(2):75. PubMed ID: 25631272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of repeated drill use on temperature of bone during preparation for osteosynthesis self-tapping screws.
Allan W; Williams ED; Kerawala CJ
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Aug; 43(4):314-9. PubMed ID: 15949876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of Temperature Rise and Time of Alveolar Ridge Splitting by Means of Er:YAG Laser, Piezosurgery, and Surgical Saw: An Ex Vivo Study.
Matys J; Flieger R; Dominiak M
Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():9654975. PubMed ID: 27957502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative Study on the Cutting Effectiveness and Heat Generation of Rotary Instruments Versus Piezoelectric Surgery Tips Using Scanning Electron Microscopy and Thermal Analysis.
Fugito Junior K; Cortes AR; de Carvalho Destro R; Yoshimoto M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(2):345-350. PubMed ID: 29534123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Heat Production and Drill Wear Following Osseous Resective Surgery: A Preliminary In Vitro SEM Study Comparing Piezosurgery and Conventional Drilling.
Tepedino M; Romano F; Indolfi M; Aimetti M
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2018; 38(3):e33-e40. PubMed ID: 29813142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In Vitro Assessment with the Infrared Thermometer of Temperature Differences Generated During Implant Site Preparation: The Traditional Technique Versus the Single-Drill Technique.
Lucchiari N; Frigo AC; Stellini E; Coppe M; Berengo M; Bacci C
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 18(1):182-91. PubMed ID: 25040939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Infrared thermographic evaluation of temperature modifications induced during implant site preparation with cylindrical versus conical drills.
Scarano A; Piattelli A; Assenza B; Carinci F; Di Donato L; Romani GL; Merla A
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Dec; 13(4):319-23. PubMed ID: 19681941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro comparison of the effect of piezosurgery and conventional bone preparation technique on intraosseous heat generation.
Cziriak NB; Szalma J; Vag J; Bogdan S
Fogorv Sz; 2016 Sep; 109(3):88-93. PubMed ID: 29693954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Osteotomy speed, heat development, and bone structure influence by various piezoelectric systems-an in vitro study.
Noetzel N; Fienitz T; Kreppel M; Zirk M; Safi AF; Rothamel D
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Nov; 23(11):4029-4041. PubMed ID: 30826919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inferior alveolar nerve transposition--an in vitro comparison between piezosurgery and conventional bur use.
Metzger MC; Bormann KH; Schoen R; Gellrich NC; Schmelzeisen R
J Oral Implantol; 2006; 32(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 16526578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of load on heat production, thermal effects and expenditure of time during implant site preparation - an experimental ex vivo comparison between piezosurgery and conventional drilling.
Stelzle F; Frenkel C; Riemann M; Knipfer C; Stockmann P; Nkenke E
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Feb; 25(2):e140-8. PubMed ID: 23186531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recommended Drilling Parameters of Tungsten Carbide Round Drills for the Most Optimal Bone Removals in Oral Surgery.
Szalma J; Klein O; Lovász BV; Lempel E; Jeges S; Olasz L
Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():3108581. PubMed ID: 30581849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparative study bone tissue temperature changes by using conventional and piezosurgical methods in dental implantology].
Kulakov AA; Vinnichenko OY; Badalyan VA
Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2015; 94(6):8-10. PubMed ID: 27002694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
