BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2884421)

  • 1. A new prognostic classification of rectal cancer.
    Jass JR; Love SB; Northover JM
    Lancet; 1987 Jun; 1(8545):1303-6. PubMed ID: 2884421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The pathological classification of colorectal cancer.
    Jass JR
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 1987 Jul; 16(3):469-73. PubMed ID: 2829694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Verification of a new clinicopathologic staging system for colorectal adenocarcinoma.
    Michelassi F; Ayala JJ; Balestracci T; Goldberg R; Chappell R; Block GE
    Ann Surg; 1991 Jul; 214(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 2064465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The pathological grading and staging of rectal cancer.
    Jass JR
    Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl; 1988; 149():21-38. PubMed ID: 3201157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relative prognostic value of the Dukes and the Jass systems in rectal cancer. Findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Projects (Protocol R-01).
    Fisher ER; Robinsky B; Sass R; Fisher B
    Dis Colon Rectum; 1989 Nov; 32(11):944-9. PubMed ID: 2478350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new prognostic staging system for rectal cancer.
    Ueno H; Price AB; Wilkinson KH; Jass JR; Mochizuki H; Talbot IC
    Ann Surg; 2004 Nov; 240(5):832-9. PubMed ID: 15492565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of pT3 subgroups on outcome of R0-resected colorectal tumors.
    Mrak K; Jagoditsch M; Leibl S; Klingler A; Tschmelitsch J
    South Med J; 2011 Nov; 104(11):722-30. PubMed ID: 22024778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Local excision of rectal cancer followed by radical surgery because of poor prognostic features does not compromise the long term oncologic outcome.
    Gagliardi G; Newton TR; Bailey HR
    Colorectal Dis; 2013 Nov; 15(11):e659-64. PubMed ID: 24033889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reporting colorectal cancer.
    Jass JR; Morson BC
    J Clin Pathol; 1987 Sep; 40(9):1016-23. PubMed ID: 3312296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A 5- to 21-year follow-up and analysis of 250 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma.
    Michelassi F; Block GE; Vannucci L; Montag A; Chappell R
    Ann Surg; 1988 Sep; 208(3):379-89. PubMed ID: 3421761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prognostic Relevance of Mucinous Subtype in a Population-based Propensity Score Analysis of 40,083 Rectal Cancer Patients.
    Tarantino I; Hüttner FJ; Warschkow R; Schmied BM; Diener MK; Ulrich A
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 May; 23(5):1576-86. PubMed ID: 26714956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Multivariate prognostic analysis of patients with low and middle rectal cancer after curative resection].
    Li CS; Wan DS; Pan ZZ; Zhou ZW; Chen G; Wu XJ; Li LR; Lu ZH; Ding PR; Li Y
    Ai Zheng; 2006 May; 25(5):587-90. PubMed ID: 16687079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Correlation of invasion, metastasis, and prognosis in low and middle rectal cancer].
    He WJ; Wang L; Hu H; Kang SY; Qian HX; Xu FM
    Ai Zheng; 2002 Nov; 21(11):1222-5. PubMed ID: 12526220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Factors of prognostic value in colorectal carcinoma. Anatomopathological study of 190 cases].
    Paz RA; Sundblad AS; Pedernera HL
    Medicina (B Aires); 1979; 39(3):334-8. PubMed ID: 229381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The grading of rectal cancer: historical perspectives and a multivariate analysis of 447 cases.
    Jass JR; Atkin WS; Cuzick J; Bussey HJ; Morson BC; Northover JM; Todd IP
    Histopathology; 1986 May; 10(5):437-59. PubMed ID: 3721406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictors for regional lymph node metastasis in T1 rectal cancer: a population-based SEER analysis.
    Brunner W; Widmann B; Marti L; Tarantino I; Schmied BM; Warschkow R
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Oct; 30(10):4405-15. PubMed ID: 26895892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Prognostic value of Jass classification of rectal cancer compared to original Dukes system].
    Szynglarewicz B; Grzebieniak Z; Forgacz J; Pudełko M; Rapała M
    Wiad Lek; 2005; 58(9-10):491-4. PubMed ID: 16529057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prognostic significance of the mucin component in stage III rectal carcinoma patients.
    Wang M; Zhang YC; Yang XY; Wang ZQ
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(19):8101-5. PubMed ID: 25338991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Clinical and morphological comparative correlations in rectal cancer and their prognostic importance].
    Ul'ianov VI; Fedorov VD; Zarudin VV
    Vopr Onkol; 1978; 24(4):26-31. PubMed ID: 207018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Current MRI staging of rectal cancer].
    Wietek BM; Kratt T
    Rofo; 2012 Nov; 184(11):992-1001. PubMed ID: 22893486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.