399 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28844405)
1. Genetic and epigenetic risks of assisted reproduction.
Jiang Z; Wang Y; Lin J; Xu J; Ding G; Huang H
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Oct; 44():90-104. PubMed ID: 28844405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pregnancy outcomes after assisted human reproduction.
Okun N; Sierra S; ;
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2014 Jan; 36(1):64-83. PubMed ID: 24444289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy in assisted reproductive technology: a 6-year, single-center study.
Bu Z; Xiong Y; Wang K; Sun Y
Fertil Steril; 2016 Jul; 106(1):90-94. PubMed ID: 27001382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cryobiology in human assisted reproductive technology. Would Hippocrates approve?
Bredkjaer HE; Grudzinskas JG
Early Pregnancy (Cherry Hill); 2001 Jul; 5(3):211-3. PubMed ID: 11753534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Association of assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment and parental infertility diagnosis with autism in ART-conceived children.
Kissin DM; Zhang Y; Boulet SL; Fountain C; Bearman P; Schieve L; Yeargin-Allsopp M; Jamieson DJ
Hum Reprod; 2015 Feb; 30(2):454-65. PubMed ID: 25518976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Clinical effects of oocyte cryopreservation in assisted reproduction technology].
Wang W; Yan ZJ; Cai LB; Chai DC; Liu CZ; Mao YD; Liu JY
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Oct; 88(39):2755-8. PubMed ID: 19080449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pre-term birth and low birth weight following preimplantation genetic diagnosis: analysis of 88 010 singleton live births following PGD and IVF cycles.
Sunkara SK; Antonisamy B; Selliah HY; Kamath MS
Hum Reprod; 2017 Feb; 32(2):432-438. PubMed ID: 27979918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of assisted reproduction, infertility, sex and paternal factors on the placental DNA methylome.
Choufani S; Turinsky AL; Melamed N; Greenblatt E; Brudno M; Bérard A; Fraser WD; Weksberg R; Trasler J; Monnier P;
Hum Mol Genet; 2019 Feb; 28(3):372-385. PubMed ID: 30239726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors affecting low birthweight after assisted reproduction technology: difference between transfer of fresh and cryopreserved embryos suggests an adverse effect of oocyte collection.
Shih W; Rushford DD; Bourne H; Garrett C; McBain JC; Healy DL; Baker HW
Hum Reprod; 2008 Jul; 23(7):1644-53. PubMed ID: 18442997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of live-birth defects after luteal-phase ovarian stimulation vs. conventional ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization and vitrified embryo transfer cycles.
Chen H; Wang Y; Lyu Q; Ai A; Fu Y; Tian H; Cai R; Hong Q; Chen Q; Shoham Z; Kuang Y
Fertil Steril; 2015 May; 103(5):1194-1201.e2. PubMed ID: 25813280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ICMART) world report: assisted reproductive technology 2004.
Sullivan EA; Zegers-Hochschild F; Mansour R; Ishihara O; de Mouzon J; Nygren KG; Adamson GD
Hum Reprod; 2013 May; 28(5):1375-90. PubMed ID: 23442757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2012: results generated from European registers by ESHRE.
; Calhaz-Jorge C; de Geyter C; Kupka MS; de Mouzon J; Erb K; Mocanu E; Motrenko T; Scaravelli G; Wyns C; Goossens V
Hum Reprod; 2016 Aug; 31(8):1638-52. PubMed ID: 27496943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Parental imprinting related to Assisted Reproductive Technologies].
Fauque P; Jouannet P; Jammes H
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2008 Nov; 36(11):1139-46. PubMed ID: 18922729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reduction of the multiple pregnancy rate in a preimplantation genetic diagnosis programme after introduction of single blastocyst transfer and cryopreservation of blastocysts biopsied on day 3.
El-Toukhy T; Kamal A; Wharf E; Grace J; Bolton V; Khalaf Y; Braude P
Hum Reprod; 2009 Oct; 24(10):2642-8. PubMed ID: 19567414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assisted reproductive technologies and birth defects.
Shiota K; Yamada S
Congenit Anom (Kyoto); 2005 Jun; 45(2):39-43. PubMed ID: 15904430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk of genetic and epigenetic alteration in children conceived following ART: Is it time to return to nature whenever possible?
Sciorio R; Tramontano L; Rapalini E; Bellaminutti S; Bulletti FM; D'Amato A; Manna C; Palagiano A; Bulletti C; Esteves SC
Clin Genet; 2023 Feb; 103(2):133-145. PubMed ID: 36109352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: state of the art.
Basille C; Frydman R; El Aly A; Hesters L; Fanchin R; Tachdjian G; Steffann J; LeLorc'h M; Achour-Frydman N
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Jul; 145(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 19411132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes in blastocyst-stage biopsy with frozen embryo transfer and cleavage-stage biopsy with fresh embryo transfer after preimplantation genetic diagnosis/screening.
Jing S; Luo K; He H; Lu C; Zhang S; Tan Y; Gong F; Lu G; Lin G
Fertil Steril; 2016 Jul; 106(1):105-112.e4. PubMed ID: 27005274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Reproductive Health-Oriented Development in Assisted Reproductive Technologies].
Hu P; Pan J; Liu X; Huang H
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2024 May; 55(3):501-506. PubMed ID: 38948299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: a national multicenter obstetric and neonatal follow-up study.
Bay B; Ingerslev HJ; Lemmen JG; Degn B; Rasmussen IA; Kesmodel US
Fertil Steril; 2016 Nov; 106(6):1363-1369.e1. PubMed ID: 27542705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
