These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
10. Impact of replacing Chinese ethnicity-specific fetal biometry charts with the INTERGROWTH-21(st) standard. Cheng Y; Leung TY; Lao T; Chan YM; Sahota DS BJOG; 2016 Sep; 123 Suppl 3():48-55. PubMed ID: 27627597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Neonatal anthropometry at 3400 m above sea level compared with INTERGROWTH 21st standards Villamonte-Calanche W; Manrique-Corazao F; Jerí-Palomino M; De-La-Torre C; Roque-Roque JS; Wilson NA J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Jan; 30(2):155-158. PubMed ID: 26957192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the Hadlock and INTERGROWTH formulas for calculating estimated fetal weight in a preterm population in France. Monier I; Ego A; Benachi A; Ancel PY; Goffinet F; Zeitlin J Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):476.e1-476.e12. PubMed ID: 30118693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. INTERGROWTH-21st vs customized birthweight standards for identification of perinatal mortality and morbidity. Anderson NH; Sadler LC; McKinlay CJD; McCowan LME Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):509.e1-509.e7. PubMed ID: 26546850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Customized vs INTERGROWTH-21 Francis A; Hugh O; Gardosi J Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S692-S699. PubMed ID: 29422208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. International standards for newborn weight, length, and head circumference by gestational age and sex: the Newborn Cross-Sectional Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. Villar J; Cheikh Ismail L; Victora CG; Ohuma EO; Bertino E; Altman DG; Lambert A; Papageorghiou AT; Carvalho M; Jaffer YA; Gravett MG; Purwar M; Frederick IO; Noble AJ; Pang R; Barros FC; Chumlea C; Bhutta ZA; Kennedy SH; Lancet; 2014 Sep; 384(9946):857-68. PubMed ID: 25209487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Hadlock Method Is Superior to Newer Methods for the Prediction of the Birth Weight Percentile. Blue NR; Savabi M; Beddow ME; Katukuri VR; Fritts CM; Izquierdo LA; Chao CR J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Mar; 38(3):587-596. PubMed ID: 30244476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Are selection criteria for healthy pregnancies responsible for the gap between fetal growth in the French national Elfe birth cohort and the Intergrowth-21st fetal growth standards? Heude B; Le Guern M; Forhan A; Scherdel P; Kadawathagedara M; Dufourg MN; Bois C; Cheminat M; Goffinet F; Botton J; Charles MA; Zeitlin J Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2019 Jan; 33(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 30485470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the INTERGROWTH-21st project newborn standard for use in Canada. Liu S; Metcalfe A; León JA; Sauve R; Kramer MS; Joseph KS; PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0172910. PubMed ID: 28257473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clarification of INTERGROWTH-21 Zeitlin J; Monier I Lancet; 2018 May; 391(10134):1995-1996. PubMed ID: 29864016 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of applying universal fetal growth standards in a Scandinavian multi-ethnic population. Sletner L; Kiserud T; Vangen S; Nakstad B; Jenum AK Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Feb; 97(2):168-179. PubMed ID: 29192969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]