280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28845035)
1. Comparative fracture behavior of monolithic and veneered zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses.
Lopez-Suarez C; Rodriguez V; Pelaez J; Agustin-Panadero R; Suarez MJ
Dent Mater J; 2017 Nov; 36(6):816-821. PubMed ID: 28845035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fracture load of metal-ceramic, monolithic, and bi-layered zirconia-based posterior fixed dental prostheses after thermo-mechanical cycling.
López-Suárez C; Castillo-Oyagüe R; Rodríguez-Alonso V; Lynch CD; Suárez-García MJ
J Dent; 2018 Jun; 73():97-104. PubMed ID: 29678585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of Thermomechanical and Static Loading on the Load to Fracture of Metal-Ceramic, Monolithic, and Veneered Zirconia Posterior Fixed Partial Dentures.
Lopez-Suarez C; Tobar C; Sola-Ruiz MF; Pelaez J; Suarez MJ
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):171-178. PubMed ID: 30548895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Marginal Vertical Discrepancies of Monolithic and Veneered Zirconia and Metal-Ceramic Three-Unit Posterior Fixed Dental Prostheses.
Lopez-Suarez C; Gonzalo E; Pelaez J; Serrano B; Suarez MJ
Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(3):256-8. PubMed ID: 27148985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fracture Load Before and After Veneering Zirconia Posterior Fixed Dental Prostheses.
Rodríguez V; Castillo-Oyagüe R; López-Suárez C; Gonzalo E; Peláez J; Suárez-García MJ
J Prosthodont; 2016 Oct; 25(7):550-556. PubMed ID: 26380955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The fracture load and failure types of veneered anterior zirconia crowns: an analysis of normal and Weibull distribution of complete and censored data.
Stawarczyk B; Ozcan M; Hämmerle CH; Roos M
Dent Mater; 2012 May; 28(5):478-87. PubMed ID: 22196897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fracture load of ceramic restorations after fatigue loading.
Baladhandayutham B; Lawson NC; Burgess JO
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):266-71. PubMed ID: 25985741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical efficacy of veneered zirconium dioxide-based posterior partial fixed dental prostheses: five-year results.
Raigrodski AJ; Yu A; Chiche GJ; Hochstedler JL; Mancl LA; Mohamed SE
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Oct; 108(4):214-22. PubMed ID: 23031727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fracture resistance of monolithic and veneered all-ceramic four-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses after artificial aging.
Güngör MB; Nemli SK; Bal BT; Tamam E; Yılmaz H; Aydın C
J Oral Sci; 2019 Jun; 61(2):246-254. PubMed ID: 31006735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. STRESS DISTRIBUTION OF MONOLITHIC AND VENEERED THREE-UNIT ZIRCONIA FDPS: A FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS.
Alsarani MM; El-Mowaf OY; Coyle TW; Rizkalla A; Fava J
Int J Prosthodont; 2024 Jun; (3):112-122. PubMed ID: 37196037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of veneering technique on the fracture resistance of zirconia fixed dental prostheses.
Chaar MS; Witkowski S; Strub JR; Att W
J Oral Rehabil; 2013 Jan; 40(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 22672267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) generated with two CAD/CAM systems compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal single-unit posterior FDPs: a 5-year clinical prospective study.
Vigolo P; Mutinelli S
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 22339945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture Behavior of Minimally Invasive, Posterior, and Fixed Dental Prostheses Manufactured from Monolithic Zirconia.
Bömicke W; Rues S; Hlavacek V; Rammelsberg P; Schmitter M
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2016 Nov; 28(6):367-381. PubMed ID: 27562053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High-strength CAD/CAM-fabricated veneering material sintered to zirconia copings--a new fabrication mode for all-ceramic restorations.
Beuer F; Schweiger J; Eichberger M; Kappert HF; Gernet W; Edelhoff D
Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):121-8. PubMed ID: 18620748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fracture behavior of all-ceramic, implant-supported, and tooth-implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.
Alkharrat AR; Schmitter M; Rues S; Rammelsberg P
Clin Oral Investig; 2018 May; 22(4):1663-1673. PubMed ID: 29196948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of preliminary damage on the load-bearing capacity of zirconia fixed dental prostheses.
Kohorst P; Butzheinen LO; Dittmer MP; Heuer W; Borchers L; Stiesch M
J Prosthodont; 2010 Dec; 19(8):606-13. PubMed ID: 20723012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inlay-retained cantilever fixed dental prostheses to substitute a single premolar: impact of zirconia framework design after dynamic loading.
Shahin R; Tannous F; Kern M
Eur J Oral Sci; 2014 Aug; 122(4):310-6. PubMed ID: 24910293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fracture Strength of Zirconia and Alumina Ceramic Crowns Supported by Implants.
Traini T; Sorrentino R; Gherlone E; Perfetti F; Bollero P; Zarone F
J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jul; 41 Spec No():352-9. PubMed ID: 24779915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fracture resistance of CAD-CAM monolithic ceramic and veneered zirconia molar crowns after aging in a mastication simulator.
Bankoğlu Güngör M; Karakoca Nemli S
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):473-480. PubMed ID: 28645670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Static and Fatigue Loading of Veneered Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses.
Rayyan MM; Abdallah J; Segaan LG; Bonfante EA; Osman E
J Prosthodont; 2020 Oct; 29(8):679-685. PubMed ID: 32271486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
