324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28845693)
1. Automatic localization of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images by extracting symmetry features of the skull.
Neelapu BC; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Gupta A; Vasamsetti S; Balachandran R; Sardana HK
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Feb; 47(2):20170054. PubMed ID: 28845693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A knowledge-based algorithm for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images.
Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Balachandran R; Sardana HK
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Nov; 10(11):1737-52. PubMed ID: 25847662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new methodology for automatic detection of reference points in 3D cephalometry: A pilot study.
Ed-Dhahraouy M; Riri H; Ezzahmouly M; Bourzgui F; El Moutaoukkil A
Int Orthod; 2018 Jun; 16(2):328-337. PubMed ID: 29628421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computer-aided cephalometric landmark annotation for CBCT data.
Codari M; Caffini M; Tartaglia GM; Sforza C; Baselli G
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Jan; 12(1):113-121. PubMed ID: 27358080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automatic 3-dimensional cephalometric landmarking based on active shape models in related projections.
Montúfar J; Romero M; Scougall-Vilchis RJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Mar; 153(3):449-458. PubMed ID: 29501121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of 3D cephalometric measurements based on an automatic knowledge-based landmark detection algorithm.
Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Balachandran R; Sardana HK
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Jul; 11(7):1297-309. PubMed ID: 26704370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The accuracy of a designed software for automated localization of craniofacial landmarks on CBCT images.
Shahidi S; Bahrampour E; Soltanimehr E; Zamani A; Oshagh M; Moattari M; Mehdizadeh A
BMC Med Imaging; 2014 Sep; 14():32. PubMed ID: 25223399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A new mandible-specific landmark reference system for three-dimensional cephalometry using cone-beam computed tomography.
Pittayapat P; Jacobs R; Bornstein MM; Odri GA; Kwon MS; Lambrichts I; Willems G; Politis C; Olszewski R
Eur J Orthod; 2016 Dec; 38(6):563-568. PubMed ID: 26683131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hybrid approach for automatic cephalometric landmark annotation on cone-beam computed tomography volumes.
Montúfar J; Romero M; Scougall-Vilchis RJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Jul; 154(1):140-150. PubMed ID: 29957312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
Moshiri M; Scarfe WC; Hilgers ML; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):550-60. PubMed ID: 17920510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cone-beam computed tomography: accuracy of three-dimensional cephalometry analysis and influence of patient scanning position.
Frongia G; Piancino MG; Bracco P
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 23(4):1038-43. PubMed ID: 22777473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison between 2D and 3D cephalometry on CBCT scans of human skulls.
van Vlijmen OJ; Maal T; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Feb; 39(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 20044238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional Frankfort horizontal plane for 3D cephalometry: a comparative assessment of conventional versus novel landmarks and horizontal planes.
Pittayapat P; Jacobs R; Bornstein MM; Odri GA; Lambrichts I; Willems G; Politis C; Olszewski R
Eur J Orthod; 2018 May; 40(3):239-248. PubMed ID: 29016738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of linear and angular measurements using two-dimensional conventional methods and three-dimensional cone beam CT images reconstructed from a volumetric rendering program in vivo.
Oz U; Orhan K; Abe N
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Dec; 40(8):492-500. PubMed ID: 22065798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multiobjective optimization framework for landmark measurement error correction in three-dimensional cephalometric tomography.
DeCesare A; Secanell M; Lagravère MO; Carey J
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(7):20130035. PubMed ID: 23640988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cephalometric and three-dimensional assessment of the posterior airway space and imaging software reliability analysis before and after orthognathic surgery.
Burkhard JP; Dietrich AD; Jacobsen C; Roos M; Lübbers HT; Obwegeser JA
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1428-36. PubMed ID: 24864074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automatic Dent-landmark detection in 3-D CBCT dental volumes.
Cheng E; Chen J; Yang J; Deng H; Wu Y; Megalooikonomou V; Gable B; Ling H
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():6204-7. PubMed ID: 22255756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls.
van Vlijmen OJ; Maal TJ; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 19583759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
