BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28845741)

  • 1. How early does attention modulate visual information processing? The importance of experimental protocol and data analysis approach.
    Slagter HA; Alilovic J; Van Gaal S
    Cogn Neurosci; 2018; 9(1-2):26-28. PubMed ID: 28845741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does spatial attention modulate the earliest component of the visual evoked potential?
    Baumgartner HM; Graulty CJ; Hillyard SA; Pitts MA
    Cogn Neurosci; 2018; 9(1-2):4-19. PubMed ID: 28534668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attentional modulation of early visual areas.
    Slotnick SD
    Cogn Neurosci; 2018; 9(1-2):1-3. PubMed ID: 29065816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of selective attention on the C1 ERP component: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Qin N; Wiens S; Rauss K; Pourtois G
    Psychophysiology; 2022 Dec; 59(12):e14123. PubMed ID: 35751845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Task dependence of early attention modulation: the plot thickens.
    Kelly SP; Mohr KS
    Cogn Neurosci; 2018; 9(1-2):24-26. PubMed ID: 28845742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The experimental parameters that affect attentional modulation of the ERP C1 component.
    Slotnick SD
    Cogn Neurosci; 2018; 9(1-2):53-62. PubMed ID: 28826303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A controversy of whether the early C1 ERP is affected by attention.
    Klein S
    Cogn Neurosci; 2018; 9(1-2):21-23. PubMed ID: 28856951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attention modulates early visual processing: An association between subjective contrast perception and early C1 ERP component.
    Pan WN; Zhao YW; Luo ZX; Chen Y; Cai YC
    Psychophysiology; 2024 May; 61(5):e14507. PubMed ID: 38146152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A sensory evoked response or precise anticipatory modulation? Mechanisms underlying the reported C1 modulation by spatial attention.
    Ding Y
    Cogn Neurosci; 2018; 9(1-2):20-21. PubMed ID: 28891403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial summation revealed in the earliest visual evoked component C1 and the effect of attention on its linearity.
    Chen J; Yu Q; Zhu Z; Peng Y; Fang F
    J Neurophysiol; 2016 Jan; 115(1):500-9. PubMed ID: 26561595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modulation of the earliest visual evoked potential by attention: now you see it, now you don't.
    Pourtois G; Rossi V; Vuilleumier P; Rauss K
    Cogn Neurosci; 2018; 9(1-2):23-24. PubMed ID: 28844182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. No Evidence that Predictions and Attention Modulate the First Feedforward Sweep of Cortical Information Processing.
    Alilović J; Timmermans B; Reteig LC; van Gaal S; Slagter HA
    Cereb Cortex; 2019 May; 29(5):2261-2278. PubMed ID: 30877784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does spatial attention modulate the C1 component? The jury continues to deliberate.
    Baumgartner HM; Graulty CJ; Hillyard SA; Pitts MA
    Cogn Neurosci; 2018; 9(1-2):34-37. PubMed ID: 28956499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. State-dependent attention modulation of human primary visual cortex: a high density ERP study.
    Rossi V; Pourtois G
    Neuroimage; 2012 May; 60(4):2365-78. PubMed ID: 22361168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pupil size directly modulates the feedforward response in human primary visual cortex independently of attention.
    Bombeke K; Duthoo W; Mueller SC; Hopf JM; Boehler CN
    Neuroimage; 2016 Feb; 127():67-73. PubMed ID: 26658931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Parvocellular and magnocellular contributions to the initial generators of the visual evoked potential: high-density electrical mapping of the "C1" component.
    Foxe JJ; Strugstad EC; Sehatpour P; Molholm S; Pasieka W; Schroeder CE; McCourt ME
    Brain Topogr; 2008 Sep; 21(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 18784997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of temporal predictability on exogenous attentional modulation of feedforward processing in the striate cortex.
    Dassanayake TL; Michie PT; Fulham R
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Jul; 105():9-16. PubMed ID: 27114044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ERP signs of categorical and supra-categorical processing of visual information.
    Zani A; Marsili G; Senerchia A; Orlandi A; Citron FM; Rizzi E; Proverbio AM
    Biol Psychol; 2015 Jan; 104():90-107. PubMed ID: 25447739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On determining the intracranial sources of visual evoked potentials from scalp topography: a reply to Kelly et al. (this issue).
    Ales JM; Yates JL; Norcia AM
    Neuroimage; 2013 Jan; 64():703-11. PubMed ID: 22982584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Several studies with significant C1 attention effects survive critical analysis.
    Slotnick SD
    Cogn Neurosci; 2018; 9(1-2):80-90. PubMed ID: 29065781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.