These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28846784)

  • 1. Assessment of discrimination ability in ipsilateral and contralateral ears with a unilateral bone-anchored hearing system.
    Celikgun B; Kalcioglu MT
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2017 Aug; 96(8):297-310. PubMed ID: 28846784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of a new powerful bone-anchored hearing system: a comparison study.
    Bosman AJ; Snik AF; Hol MK; Mylanus EA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):505-13. PubMed ID: 23886427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bone-anchored Hearing Aids: correlation between pure-tone thresholds and outcome in three user groups.
    Pfiffner F; Kompis M; Stieger C
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):884-90. PubMed ID: 19730146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effectiveness of the directional microphone in the Oticon Medical Ponto Pro in participants with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss.
    Oeding K; Valente M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Sep; 24(8):701-13. PubMed ID: 24131606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Audiological and subjective benefit results in bone-anchored hearing device users.
    Boleas-Aguirre MS; Bulnes Plano MD; de Erenchun Lasa IR; Ibáñez Beroiz B
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):494-503. PubMed ID: 22472615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Wireless and acoustic hearing with bone-anchored hearing devices.
    Bosman AJ; Mylanus EA; Hol MK; Snik AF
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 55(7):419-24. PubMed ID: 27176657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of speech discrimination in noise and directional hearing with 2 different sound processors of a bone-anchored hearing system in adults with unilateral severe or profound sensorineural hearing loss.
    Wesarg T; Aschendorff A; Laszig R; Beck R; Schild C; Hassepass F; Kroeger S; Hocke T; Arndt S
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1064-70. PubMed ID: 23856626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the Benefits of Bilateral Fitting in Bone-Anchored Hearing System Users: Spatial Resolution and Memory for Speech.
    Brassington W; Parker R; Bianchi F
    Ear Hear; 2023 May-Jun 01; 44(3):530-543. PubMed ID: 36378104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Expanding the indications for the bone anchored hearing system (BAHS) in patients with single sided deafness.
    Wazen JJ; Ortega C; Nazarian R; Smith J; Thompson J; Lange L
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2021; 42(3):102864. PubMed ID: 33476970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Audiometric evaluation of bilaterally fitted bone-anchored hearing aids.
    Bosman AJ; Snik AF; van der Pouw CT; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Audiology; 2001; 40(3):158-67. PubMed ID: 11465298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Comparative Study of Audiologic Outcomes for Two Transcutaneous Bone-Anchored Hearing Devices.
    Powell HR; Rolfe AM; Birman CS
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Sep; 36(9):1525-31. PubMed ID: 26375976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retrospective audiological analysis of bone conduction versus round window vibratory stimulation in patients with mixed hearing loss.
    Mojallal H; Schwab B; Hinze AL; Giere T; Lenarz T
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jun; 54(6):391-400. PubMed ID: 25735204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Influence of hearing aids on monosyllabic test score and subjective everyday hearing].
    Thümmler R; Liebscher T; Hoppe U
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):595-600. PubMed ID: 27126291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preliminary comparison of bone-anchored hearing instruments and a dental device as treatments for unilateral hearing loss.
    Moore BC; Popelka GR
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Oct; 52(10):678-86. PubMed ID: 23859058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of contralateral masking on high-frequency bone-conduction thresholds.
    McDermott JC; Fausti SA; Henry JA; Frey RH
    Audiology; 1990; 29(6):297-303. PubMed ID: 2275644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Amplification of transcutaneous and percutaneous bone-conduction devices with a test-band in an induced model of conductive hearing loss.
    Park MJ; Lee JR; Yang CJ; Yoo MH; Jin IS; Choi CH; Park HJ
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):653-7. PubMed ID: 27347717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Bonebridge: preclinical evaluation of a new transcutaneously-activated bone anchored hearing device.
    Huber AM; Sim JH; Xie YZ; Chatzimichalis M; Ullrich O; Röösli C
    Hear Res; 2013 Jul; 301():93-9. PubMed ID: 23467173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of Compression Thresholds and Maximum Power Output on Speech Understanding with Bone-Anchored Hearing Systems.
    Gawliczek T; Wimmer W; Caversaccio M; Kompis M
    Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():1518385. PubMed ID: 34722757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of maximum power output on speech understanding with bone anchored hearing systems.
    Gawliczek T; Wimmer W; Caversaccio M; Kompis M
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2020 Mar; 140(3):225-229. PubMed ID: 31825702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech-in-noise perception in unilateral hearing loss: Relation to pure-tone thresholds and brainstem plasticity.
    Vannson N; James CJ; Fraysse B; Lescure B; Strelnikov K; Deguine O; Barone P; Marx M
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jul; 102():135-143. PubMed ID: 28623107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.