171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28847221)
1. Classification of Uterine Anomalies by 3-Dimensional Ultrasonography Using ESHRE/ESGE Criteria: Interobserver Variability.
Bermejo C; Martínez-Ten P; Ruíz-López L; Estévez M; Gil MM
Reprod Sci; 2018 May; 25(5):740-747. PubMed ID: 28847221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnosing Septate Uterus Using Three-Dimensional Ultrasound Using Three Different Classifications: An Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreement Study.
Peixoto C; Castro M; Carriles I; Arriba M; Lapresa V; Alcazar JL
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2021 Dec; 43(12):911-918. PubMed ID: 34933384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology/European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy and American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification systems for congenital uterine anomalies detected using three-dimensional ultrasonography.
Ludwin A; Ludwin I; Kudla M; Kottner J
Fertil Steril; 2015 Sep; 104(3):688-97.e8. PubMed ID: 26158905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. ESHRE/ESGE female genital tract anomalies classification system-the potential impact of discarding arcuate uterus on clinical practice.
Knez J; Saridogan E; Van Den Bosch T; Mavrelos D; Ambler G; Jurkovic D
Hum Reprod; 2018 Apr; 33(4):600-606. PubMed ID: 29514262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Congenital Uterine Malformation by Experts (CUME): better criteria for distinguishing between normal/arcuate and septate uterus?
Ludwin A; Martins WP; Nastri CO; Ludwin I; Coelho Neto MA; Leitão VM; Acién M; Alcazar JL; Benacerraf B; Condous G; De Wilde RL; Emanuel MH; Gibbons W; Guerriero S; Hurd WW; Levine D; Lindheim S; Pellicer A; Petraglia F; Saridogan E
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 51(1):101-109. PubMed ID: 29024135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Septate uterus according to ESHRE/ESGE, ASRM and CUME definitions: association with infertility and miscarriage, cost and warnings for women and healthcare systems.
Ludwin A; Ludwin I; Coelho Neto MA; Nastri CO; Bhagavath B; Lindheim SR; Martins WP
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 54(6):800-814. PubMed ID: 30977223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the ESHRE-ESGE and ASRM classifications of Müllerian duct anomalies in everyday practice.
Ludwin A; Ludwin I
Hum Reprod; 2015 Mar; 30(3):569-80. PubMed ID: 25534461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis and the classification of congenital uterine anomalies using the ESHRE/ESGE classification: a diagnostic accuracy study.
Kougioumtsidou A; Mikos T; Grimbizis GF; Karavida A; Theodoridis TD; Sotiriadis A; Tarlatzis BC; Athanasiadis AP
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Mar; 299(3):779-789. PubMed ID: 30661094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies.
Grimbizis GF; Di Spiezio Sardo A; Saravelos SH; Gordts S; Exacoustos C; Van Schoubroeck D; Bermejo C; Amso NN; Nargund G; Timmerman D; Athanasiadis A; Brucker S; De Angelis C; Gergolet M; Li TC; Tanos V; Tarlatzis B; Farquharson R; Gianaroli L; Campo R
Hum Reprod; 2016 Jan; 31(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 26537921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound compared with magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies using ESHRE-ESGE consensus on the classification of congenital anomalies of the female genital tract.
Graupera B; Pascual MA; Hereter L; Browne JL; Úbeda B; Rodríguez I; Pedrero C
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Nov; 46(5):616-22. PubMed ID: 25690307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Congenital Uterine Malformation by Experts (CUME): diagnostic criteria for T-shaped uterus.
Ludwin A; Coelho Neto MA; Ludwin I; Nastri CO; Costa W; Acién M; Alcazar JL; Benacerraf B; Condous G; DeCherney A; De Wilde RL; Diamond MP; Emanuel MH; Guerriero S; Hurd W; Levine D; Lindheim S; Pellicer A; Petraglia F; Saridogan E; Martins WP
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jun; 55(6):815-829. PubMed ID: 31432589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies.
Grimbizis GF; Gordts S; Di Spiezio Sardo A; Brucker S; De Angelis C; Gergolet M; Li TC; Tanos V; Brölmann H; Gianaroli L; Campo R
Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2032-44. PubMed ID: 23771171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The ESHRE-ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies.
Grimbizis GF; Gordts S; Di Spiezio Sardo A; Brucker S; De Angelis C; Gergolet M; Li TC; Tanos V; Brölmann H; Gianaroli L; Campo R
Gynecol Surg; 2013 Aug; 10(3):199-212. PubMed ID: 23894234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The comprehensiveness of the ESHRE/ESGE classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies: a systematic review of cases not classified by the AFS system.
Di Spiezio Sardo A; Campo R; Gordts S; Spinelli M; Cosimato C; Tanos V; Brucker S; Li TC; Gergolet M; De Angelis C; Gianaroli L; Grimbizis G
Hum Reprod; 2015 May; 30(5):1046-58. PubMed ID: 25788565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging assessment of cervix and vagina in women with uterine malformations.
Bermejo C; Martínez-Ten P; Recio M; Ruiz-López L; Díaz D; Illescas T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Mar; 43(3):336-45. PubMed ID: 23754235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reproducibility of three-dimensional ultrasound diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies.
Salim R; Woelfer B; Backos M; Regan L; Jurkovic D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 21(6):578-82. PubMed ID: 12808675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fundus Thickness Assessment by 3D Transvaginal Ultrasound Allows Metrics-Based Diagnosis and Treatment of Congenital Uterine Anomalies.
Bajka M; Badir S
Ultraschall Med; 2017 Apr; 38(2):183-189. PubMed ID: 26085458
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Prevalence of T-shaped uterus among fertile women based on ESHRE/ESGE and Congenital Uterine Malformation by Experts (CUME) criteria.
Seyhan A; Ertas S; Urman B
Reprod Biomed Online; 2021 Sep; 43(3):515-522. PubMed ID: 34281787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The value of three-dimensional ultrasound in identifying Mullerian anomalies at risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Negm SM; Kamel RA; El-Zayat HA; Elbigawy AF; El-Toukhy MM; Amin AH; Nicolaides KH
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Aug; 35(16):3201-3208. PubMed ID: 32873098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability of 3-dimensional transvaginal sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment thickness.
Boutin A; Jastrow N; Roberge S; Chaillet N; Bérubé L; Brassard N; Girard M; Bujold E
J Ultrasound Med; 2012 Jun; 31(6):933-9. PubMed ID: 22644690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
