These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28848077)

  • 1. Perception of Iterated Rippled Noise Periodicity in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Wagner L; Plontke SK; Rahne T
    Audiol Neurootol; 2017; 22(2):104-115. PubMed ID: 28848077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perception of pure tones and iterated rippled noise for normal hearing and cochlear implant users.
    Penninger RT; Chien WW; Jiradejvong P; Boeke E; Carver CL; Limb CJ
    Trends Amplif; 2013 Mar; 17(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 23539260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pitch and lexical tone perception of bilingual English-Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant recipients, hearing aid users, and normally hearing listeners.
    Looi V; Teo ER; Loo J
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S91-S104. PubMed ID: 26561892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cantonese Tone Perception for Children Who Use a Hearing Aid and a Cochlear Implant in Opposite Ears.
    Mok M; Holt CM; Lee KYS; Dowell RC; Vogel AP
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):e359-e368. PubMed ID: 28678079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cortical encoding of pitch contour changes in cochlear implant users: a mismatch negativity study.
    Zhang F; Benson C; Fu QJ
    Audiol Neurootol; 2013; 18(5):275-88. PubMed ID: 23920129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Place dependent stimulation rates improve pitch perception in cochlear implantees with single-sided deafness.
    Rader T; Döge J; Adel Y; Weissgerber T; Baumann U
    Hear Res; 2016 Sep; 339():94-103. PubMed ID: 27374479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cochlear implantation in recipients with single-sided deafness: Audiological performance.
    Hoth S; Rösli-Khabas M; Herisanu I; Plinkert PK; Praetorius M
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Jul; 17(4):190-199. PubMed ID: 27142274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Temporal representation of the delay of iterated rippled noise in the dorsal cochlear nucleus.
    Neuert V; Verhey JL; Winter IM
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 May; 93(5):2766-76. PubMed ID: 15846001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pitch strength and pitch dominance of iterated rippled noises in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Leek MR; Summers V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jun; 109(6):2944-54. PubMed ID: 11425136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of envelope modulation in spectrally unresolved iterated rippled noise.
    Wiegrebe L; Patterson RD
    Hear Res; 1999 Jun; 132(1-2):94-108. PubMed ID: 10392552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What breaks a melody: perceiving F0 and intensity sequences with a cochlear implant.
    Cousineau M; Demany L; Meyer B; Pressnitzer D
    Hear Res; 2010 Oct; 269(1-2):34-41. PubMed ID: 20674733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unilateral Hearing Loss: Understanding Speech Recognition and Localization Variability-Implications for Cochlear Implant Candidacy.
    Firszt JB; Reeder RM; Holden LK
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):159-173. PubMed ID: 28067750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Evaluation of rhythmic and timbral perception by normal-hearing and postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant users].
    Wang S; Dong RJ; Li J; Zhou Y; Qi BE; Chen XQ; Liu B
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jun; 47(6):493-5. PubMed ID: 22932144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electro-acoustic pitch matching experiments in patients with single-sided deafness and a cochlear implant: Is there a need for adjustment of the default frequency allocation tables?
    Peters JPM; Bennink E; Grolman W; van Zanten GA
    Hear Res; 2016 Dec; 342():124-133. PubMed ID: 27789255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Temporal representation of iterated rippled noise as a function of delay and sound level in the ventral cochlear nucleus.
    Wiegrebe L; Winter IM
    J Neurophysiol; 2001 Mar; 85(3):1206-19. PubMed ID: 11247990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the Pitch Strength of Bandpass Noise in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Horbach M; Verhey JL; Hots J
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518787067. PubMed ID: 30009682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pitch strength of iterated rippled noise when the pitch is ambiguous.
    Yost WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Mar; 101(3):1644-8. PubMed ID: 9069631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Maturation of the Acoustic Change Complex in Response to Iterated Ripple Noise in 'Normal'-Hearing Infants, Toddlers, and Adults.
    Strahm S; Small SA; Chan S; Tian DY; Sharma M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 May; 33(5):301-310. PubMed ID: 35613945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lexical tone recognition in noise in normal-hearing children and prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.
    Mao Y; Xu L
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S23-S30. PubMed ID: 27564095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intonational cues for speech perception in noise by cochlear implant listeners.
    Dincer D'Alessandro H; Mancini P
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Dec; 277(12):3315-3321. PubMed ID: 32444968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.