455 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28848185)
1. Comparison of Fetomaternal Outcome between 47 Deliveries Following Successful External Cephalic Version for Breech Presentation and 7456 Deliveries Following Spontaneous Cephalic Presentation.
de Gregorio N; Friedl T; Schramm A; Reister F; Janni W; Ebner F
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2018; 83(5):477-481. PubMed ID: 28848185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Successful external cephalic version is an independent factor for caesarean section during trial of labor - a matched controlled study.
Boujenah J; Fleury C; Bonneau C; Pharisien I; Tigaizin A; Carbillon L
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2017 Dec; 46(10):737-742. PubMed ID: 28951278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes following unsuccessful external cephalic version: a stratified analysis amongst failures, successes, and controls.
Balayla J; Dahdouh EM; Villeneuve S; Boucher M; Gauthier RJ; Audibert F; Fuchs F
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Mar; 28(5):605-10. PubMed ID: 24853490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Uptake of external cephalic version for term breech presentation: an Australian population study, 2002-2012.
Bin YS; Roberts CL; Nicholl MC; Ford JB
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Jul; 17(1):244. PubMed ID: 28747173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Impact of the external cephalic version on the obstetrical prognosis in a team with a high success rate of vaginal delivery in breech presentation].
Coppola C; Mottet N; Mariet AS; Baeza C; Poitrey E; Bourtembourg A; Ramanah R; Riethmuller D
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Oct; 45(8):859-865. PubMed ID: 27125381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Delivery mode and neonatal outcome after a trial of external cephalic version (ECV): a prospective trial of vaginal breech versus cephalic delivery.
Reinhard J; Sänger N; Hanker L; Reichenbach L; Yuan J; Herrmann E; Louwen F
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Apr; 287(4):663-8. PubMed ID: 23183715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mode of delivery following successful external cephalic version: comparison with spontaneous cephalic presentations at delivery.
Kuppens SM; Hutton EK; Hasaart TH; Aichi N; Wijnen HA; Pop VJ
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Oct; 35(10):883-888. PubMed ID: 24165055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Value of routine ultrasound examination at 35-37 weeks' gestation in diagnosis of non-cephalic presentation.
De Castro H; Ciobanu A; Formuso C; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 55(2):248-256. PubMed ID: 31671470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Management of breech presentation at term: a retrospective cohort study of 10 years of experience.
Burgos J; Rodríguez L; Cobos P; Osuna C; Del Mar Centeno M; Larrieta R; Martínez-Astorquiza T; Fernández-Llebrez L
J Perinatol; 2015 Oct; 35(10):803-8. PubMed ID: 26181721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Successful but limited use of external cephalic version in Auckland.
Wise MR; Sadler L; Ansell D
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Oct; 48(5):467-72. PubMed ID: 19032661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mode of childbirth and neonatal outcome after external cephalic version: A prospective cohort study.
Rosman AN; Vlemmix F; Ensing S; Opmeer BC; Te Hoven S; Velzel J; de Hundt M; van den Berg S; Rota H; van der Post JA; Mol BW; Kok M
Midwifery; 2016 Aug; 39():44-8. PubMed ID: 27321719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [External cephalic version of breech fetus after 36 weeks of gestation - evaluation of efectiveness and complications].
Hruban L; Janků P; Jordánová K; Gerychová R; Huser M; Ventruba P; Roztočil A
Ceska Gynekol; 2017; 82(6):443-449. PubMed ID: 29302977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Association of Persistent Breech Presentation With External Cephalic Version Success.
Lauterbach R; Bachar G; Ben-David C; Matanes E; Ginsberg Y; Beloosesky R; Ganem N; Weiner Z; Zipori Y
Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 137(2):258-262. PubMed ID: 33416280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Delivery outcomes in subsequent pregnancy following primary breech cesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study.
Eden-Friedman Y; Ginosar Y; Sela HY; Calderon-Margalit R; Eventov-Friedman S; Ezra Y; Weiniger CF
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 May; 33(9):1554-1560. PubMed ID: 30207183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictors for a successful external cephalic version: a single centre experience.
Ebner F; Friedl TW; Leinert E; Schramm A; Reister F; Lato K; Janni W; DeGregorio N
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Apr; 293(4):749-55. PubMed ID: 26437955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term: predictors of success, and impact on the rate of caesarean section.
Hussin OA; Mahmoud MA; Abdel-Fattah MM
East Mediterr Health J; 2013 Feb; 19(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 23516827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Breech Presentation: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - External Cephalic Version and other Interventions to turn Breech Babies to Cephalic Presentation].
Ducarme G
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2020 Jan; 48(1):81-94. PubMed ID: 31678503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Matched cohort study of external cephalic version in women with previous cesarean delivery.
Keepanasseril A; Anand K; Soundara Raghavan S
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Jul; 138(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 28380246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Labour Outcomes After Successful External Cephalic Version Compared With Spontaneous Cephalic Version.
Krueger S; Simioni J; Griffith LE; Hutton EK;
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2018 Jan; 40(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 28780214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Fewer breech deliveries after implementation of a modified cephalic version protocol].
Kuppens SM; Francois AM; Hasaart TH; van der Donk MW; Pop VJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A63. PubMed ID: 20132565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
