BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28848484)

  • 1. When Saying Sorry May Not Help: The Impact of Apologies on Social Rejections.
    Freedman G; Burgoon EM; Ferrell JD; Pennebaker JW; Beer JS
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1375. PubMed ID: 28848484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Costly group apology communicates a group's sincere "intention".
    Ohtsubo Y; Matsunaga M; Himichi T; Suzuki K; Shibata E; Hori R; Umemura T; Ohira H
    Soc Neurosci; 2020 Apr; 15(2):244-254. PubMed ID: 31762397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Why group apologies succeed and fail: intergroup forgiveness and the role of primary and secondary emotions.
    Wohl MJ; Hornsey MJ; Bennett SH
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Feb; 102(2):306-22. PubMed ID: 21806306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. "If your feelings were hurt, I'm sorry…": How Third-Year Medical Students Observe, Learn From, and Engage in Apologies.
    Fischer IC; Frankel RM
    J Gen Intern Med; 2021 May; 36(5):1352-1358. PubMed ID: 33034017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sorry, Not Sorry: Effects of Different Types of Apologies and Self-Monitoring on Non-verbal Behaviors.
    Yamamoto K; Kimura M; Osaka M
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():689615. PubMed ID: 34512447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Embodied remorse: Physical displays of remorse increase positive responses to public apologies, but have negligible effects on forgiveness.
    Hornsey MJ; Wohl MJA; Harris EA; Okimoto TG; Thai M; Wenzel M
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2020 Aug; 119(2):367-389. PubMed ID: 31512916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What happens when groups say sorry: the effect of intergroup apologies on their recipients.
    Philpot CR; Hornsey MJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Apr; 34(4):474-87. PubMed ID: 18340033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental evidence that apologies promote forgiveness by communicating relationship value.
    Forster DE; Billingsley J; Burnette JL; Lieberman D; Ohtsubo Y; McCullough ME
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jun; 11(1):13107. PubMed ID: 34162912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two is better than one: Apologies from two robots are preferred.
    Okada Y; Kimoto M; Iio T; Shimohara K; Shiomi M
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(2):e0281604. PubMed ID: 36812194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An Account of Earned Forgiveness through Apology.
    Roadevin C
    Philosophia (Ramat Gan); 2017; 45(4):1785-1802. PubMed ID: 30147183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Apologies as signals for change? Implicit theories of personality and reactions to apologies during the #MeToo movement.
    Schumann K
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226047. PubMed ID: 31869325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Belief in the malleability of groups strengthens the tenuous link between a collective apology and intergroup forgiveness.
    Wohl MJ; Cohen-Chen S; Halperin E; Caouette J; Hayes N; Hornsey MJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 May; 41(5):714-25. PubMed ID: 25767157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of voluntariness of apologies on victims' responses in restorative justice: findings of a quantitative study.
    Allan A; de Mott J; Larkins IM; Turnbull L; Warwick T; Willett L; Allan MM
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2022; 29(4):593-609. PubMed ID: 35903502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How important is an apology to you? Forecasting errors in evaluating the value of apologies.
    De Cremer D; Pillutla MM; Folmer CR
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Jan; 22(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 21123857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How voluntariness of apologies affects actual and hypothetical victims' perceptions of the offender.
    Jehle A; Miller MK; Kemmelmeier M; Maskaly J
    J Soc Psychol; 2012; 152(6):727-45. PubMed ID: 23057192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Softening the Blow of Social Exclusion: The Responsive Theory of Social Exclusion.
    Freedman G; Williams KD; Beer JS
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1570. PubMed ID: 27777566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of negotiated and delegated apologies in settlement negotiation.
    Robbennolt JK
    Law Hum Behav; 2013 Apr; 37(2):128-35. PubMed ID: 23244602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The power of apology: how saying sorry can leave both patients and nurses feeling better.
    Armstrong D
    Nurs Times; 2009 Nov 10-16; 105(44):16-9. PubMed ID: 20092211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sorry to ask but … how is apology effectiveness dependent on apology content and gender?
    Polin B; Doyle SP; Kim S; Lewicki RJ; Chawla N
    J Appl Psychol; 2024 Mar; 109(3):339-361. PubMed ID: 37856409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Did You Reject Me for Someone Else? Rejections That Are Comparative Feel Worse.
    Deri S; Zitek EM
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1675-1685. PubMed ID: 28914145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.