215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28849580)
1. Diminishing-cues retrieval practice: A memory-enhancing technique that works when regular testing doesn't.
Fiechter JL; Benjamin AS
Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1868-1876. PubMed ID: 28849580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Techniques for scaffolding retrieval practice: The costs and benefits of adaptive versus diminishing cues.
Fiechter JL; Benjamin AS
Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Oct; 26(5):1666-1674. PubMed ID: 31161529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Retrieval practice: a simple strategy for improving memory after traumatic brain injury.
Sumowski JF; Wood HG; Chiaravalloti N; Wylie GR; Lengenfelder J; DeLuca J
J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2010 Nov; 16(6):1147-50. PubMed ID: 20946709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing the testing effect under blocked and mixed practice: The mnemonic benefits of retrieval practice are not affected by practice format.
Abel M; Roediger HL
Mem Cognit; 2017 Jan; 45(1):81-92. PubMed ID: 27464491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Why is test-restudy practice beneficial for memory? An evaluation of the mediator shift hypothesis.
Pyc MA; Rawson KA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):737-46. PubMed ID: 22060276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reversing the testing effect by feedback: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
Pastötter B; Bäuml KH
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Jun; 16(3):473-88. PubMed ID: 26857480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mnemonic benefits of retrieval practice at short retention intervals.
Rowland CA; DeLosh EL
Memory; 2015; 23(3):403-19. PubMed ID: 24579674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The testing effect in a social setting: Does retrieval practice benefit a listener?
Abel M; Roediger HL
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2018 Sep; 24(3):347-359. PubMed ID: 29172560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retrieval practice improves memory in multiple sclerosis: clinical application of the testing effect.
Sumowski JF; Chiaravalloti N; Deluca J
Neuropsychology; 2010 Mar; 24(2):267-72. PubMed ID: 20230121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Testing the primary and convergent retrieval model of recall: Recall practice produces faster recall success but also faster recall failure.
Hopper WJ; Huber DE
Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):816-841. PubMed ID: 30737729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Test-potentiated learning: three independent replications, a disconfirmed hypothesis, and an unexpected boundary condition.
Wissman KT; Rawson KA
Memory; 2018 Apr; 26(4):406-414. PubMed ID: 28691577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retrieval practice makes procedure from remembering: An automatization account of the testing effect.
Racsmány M; Szőllősi Á; Bencze D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Jan; 44(1):157-166. PubMed ID: 28661178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of Retrieval Practice on Short-Term and Long-Term Retention in HIV+ Individuals.
Avci G; Woods SP; Verduzco M; Sheppard DP; Sumowski JF; Chiaravalloti ND; DeLuca J;
J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2017 Mar; 23(3):214-222. PubMed ID: 28067192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sleep can reduce the testing effect: it enhances recall of restudied items but can leave recall of retrieved items unaffected.
Bäuml KH; Holterman C; Abel M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Nov; 40(6):1568-81. PubMed ID: 24933697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Putting action into testing: Enacted retrieval benefits long-term retention more than covert retrieval.
Kubik V; Jönsson FU; de Jonge M; Arshamian A
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Dec; 73(12):2093-2105. PubMed ID: 32686985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A dual memory theory of the testing effect.
Rickard TC; Pan SC
Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Jun; 25(3):847-869. PubMed ID: 28585057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The testing effect under divided attention.
Buchin ZL; Mulligan NW
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1934-1947. PubMed ID: 28504527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Aging and memory as discrimination: Influences of encoding specificity, cue overload, and prior knowledge.
Badham SP; Poirier M; Gandhi N; Hadjivassiliou A; Maylor EA
Psychol Aging; 2016 Nov; 31(7):758-770. PubMed ID: 27831714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Testing and feedback effects on front-end control over later retrieval.
Thomas RC; McDaniel MA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Mar; 39(2):437-50. PubMed ID: 22732026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Attention and the testing effect.
Mulligan NW; Picklesimer M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jun; 42(6):938-50. PubMed ID: 26618913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
