These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28849580)

  • 21. The replicability of the negative testing effect: Differences across participant populations.
    Mulligan NW; Rawson KA; Peterson DJ; Wissman KT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):752-763. PubMed ID: 29094992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Conditions of highly specific learning through cued recall.
    Pan SC; Lovelett J; Stoeckenius D; Rickard TC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):634-640. PubMed ID: 30937830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Retrieval activates related words more than presentation.
    Hausman H; Rhodes MG
    Memory; 2018 Oct; 26(9):1265-1280. PubMed ID: 29571266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Benefits from retrieval practice are greater for students with lower working memory capacity.
    Agarwal PK; Finley JR; Rose NS; Roediger HL
    Memory; 2017 Jul; 25(6):764-771. PubMed ID: 27531308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Progressive retrieval practice leads to greater memory for image-word pairs than standard retrieval practice.
    Liu S; Zheng Z; Kent C; Briscoe J
    Memory; 2022 Aug; 30(7):796-805. PubMed ID: 35638593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Retrieval practice improves memory in survivors of severe traumatic brain injury.
    Sumowski JF; Coyne J; Cohen A; Deluca J
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Feb; 95(2):397-400. PubMed ID: 24231401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The role of mediators in memory retrieval as a function of practice: controlled mediation to direct access.
    Crutcher RJ; Ericsson KA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Sep; 26(5):1297-317. PubMed ID: 11009259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: a meta-analytic review of the testing effect.
    Rowland CA
    Psychol Bull; 2014 Nov; 140(6):1432-63. PubMed ID: 25150680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The two faces of selective memory retrieval: recall specificity of the detrimental but not the beneficial effect.
    Bäuml KH; Dobler IM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jan; 41(1):246-53. PubMed ID: 24707790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Metacognitive control in self-regulated learning: Conditions affecting the choice of restudying versus retrieval practice.
    Toppino TC; LaVan MH; Iaconelli RT
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Oct; 46(7):1164-1177. PubMed ID: 29845590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of testing on subsequent re-encoding and long-term forgetting of action-relevant materials: On the influence of recall type.
    Kubik V; Nilsson LG; Olofsson JK; Jönsson FU
    Scand J Psychol; 2015 Oct; 56(5):475-81. PubMed ID: 26243692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Does retrieval practice enhance learning and transfer relative to restudy for term-definition facts?
    Pan SC; Rickard TC
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2017 Sep; 23(3):278-292. PubMed ID: 28358548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Transfer-appropriate processing in the testing effect.
    Veltre MT; Cho KW; Neely JH
    Memory; 2015; 23(8):1229-37. PubMed ID: 25345914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Test-potentiated learning: distinguishing between direct and indirect effects of tests.
    Arnold KM; McDermott KB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):940-5. PubMed ID: 22774852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Expanded vs. equal interval spaced retrieval practice: exploring different schedules of spacing and retention interval in younger and older adults.
    Logan JM; Balota DA
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2008 May; 15(3):257-80. PubMed ID: 18421627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier.
    Halamish V; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):801-12. PubMed ID: 21480751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The role of retrieval mode and retrieval orientation in retrieval practice: insights from comparing recognition memory testing formats and restudying.
    Gao C; Rosburg T; Hou M; Li B; Xiao X; Guo C
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Dec; 16(6):977-990. PubMed ID: 27469235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Contextual match and cue-independence of retrieval-induced forgetting: Testing the prediction of the model by Norman, Newman, and Detre (2007).
    Hanczakowski M; Mazzoni G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):953-8. PubMed ID: 23088549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Transfer of test-enhanced learning: Meta-analytic review and synthesis.
    Pan SC; Rickard TC
    Psychol Bull; 2018 Jul; 144(7):710-756. PubMed ID: 29733621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Retrieval practice improves memory in patients with schizophrenia: new perspectives for cognitive remediation.
    Jantzi C; Mengin AC; Serfaty D; Bacon E; Elowe J; Severac F; Meyer N; Berna F; Vidailhet P
    BMC Psychiatry; 2019 Nov; 19(1):355. PubMed ID: 31711448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.