169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28850176)
1. "Life's hurried tangled road": A therapeutic jurisprudence analysis of why dedicated counsel must be assigned to represent persons with mental disabilities in community settings.
Lynch AJ; Perlin ML
Behav Sci Law; 2017 Jul; 35(4):353-363. PubMed ID: 28850176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Behavioral health issue brief: outpatient civil commitment: year end report-2003.
McKinley A
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2003 Dec; ():1-12. PubMed ID: 14870735
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Therapeutic jurisprudence and the civil rights of institutionalized mentally disabled persons: hopeless oxymoron or path to redemption?
Perlin ML; Gould KK; Dorfman DA
Psychol Public Policy Law; 1995 Mar; 1(1):80-119. PubMed ID: 12803207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. "Too stubborn to ever be governed by enforced insanity": Some therapeutic jurisprudence dilemmas in the representation of criminal defendants in incompetency and insanity cases.
Perlin ML
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2010; 33(5-6):475-81. PubMed ID: 20947166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Therapeutic jurisprudence and outpatient commitment law: Kendra's Law and case study.
Perlin ML
Psychol Public Policy Law; 2003; 9(1-2):183-208. PubMed ID: 16700141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outpatient commitment: a therapeutic jurisprudence analysis.
Winick BJ
Psychol Public Policy Law; 2003; 9(1-2):107-44. PubMed ID: 16700139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Civil commitment and the criminal insanity plea in Israeli law.
Toib JA
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(4):308-18. PubMed ID: 18374417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. "Their promises of paradise": will Olmstead v. L.C. resuscitate the constitutional "least restrictive alternative" principle in mental disability law?
Perlin ML
Houst Law Rev; 2000; 37(4):999-1054. PubMed ID: 12071222
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Exposing the myths surrounding preventive outpatient commitment for individuals with chronic mental illness.
Cornwell JK; Deeney R
Psychol Public Policy Law; 2003; 9(1-2):209-32. PubMed ID: 16700142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Developments in the law: the law of mental illness.
Harv Law Rev; 2008 Feb; 121(4):1114-91. PubMed ID: 18354871
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Guidelines for involuntary civil commitment.
National Center for State Courts' Institute on Mental Disability and the Law
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1986; 10(5):409-514. PubMed ID: 11659039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The "crime" of mental illness: extension of "criminal" procedural safeguards to involuntary civil commitments.
J Crim Law Criminol; 1975 Sep; 66(3):255-70. PubMed ID: 11664547
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. An update on involuntary civil commitment to outpatient treatment.
Miller RD
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1992 Jan; 43(1):79-81. PubMed ID: 1544658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Consequences of Official Labels: An Examination of the Rights Lost by the Mentally Ill and Mentally Incompetent Since 1989.
Walker AM; Klein MS; Hemmens C; Stohr MK; Burton VS
Community Ment Health J; 2016 Apr; 52(3):272-80. PubMed ID: 26403304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Local variations in the civil commitment process.
Faulkner LR; Bloom JD; Resnick MR; Stern TO
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1983; 11(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 6850106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Legislating social control of the mentally ill in California.
Lamb HR; Sorkin AP; Zusman J
Am J Psychiatry; 1981 Mar; 138(3):334-9. PubMed ID: 7468829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Screening services in civil commitment of the mentally ill: an attempt to balance individual liberties with needs for treatment.
Aviram U
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(2):195-211. PubMed ID: 8364237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. More positive supreme court views on psychiatry.
Kennelly DJ
Am J Psychiatry; 1985 Mar; 142(3):387-8. PubMed ID: 3970284
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Trial rights and psychotropic drugs: the case against administering involuntary medications to a defendant during trial.
Klein DW
Vanderbilt Law Rev; 2002; 55(1):165-218. PubMed ID: 12680366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The right to refuse treatment in Quebec.
Morrison D
Health Law Can; 1985; 5():65-8. PubMed ID: 11660312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
