238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28851255)
1. Comparison of radial access versus femoral access with the use of a vascular closure device for the prevention of vascular complications and mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention.
Téblick A; Vanderbruggen W; Vandendriessche T; Bosmans J; Haine SEF; Miljoen H; Segers V; Wouters K; Vrints C; Claeys MJ
Acta Cardiol; 2018 Jun; 73(3):241-247. PubMed ID: 28851255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of contemporary vascular closure devices for the prevention of vascular complications after percutaneous coronary interventions in an all-comers PCI population.
Kerré S; Kustermans L; Vandendriessche T; Bosmans J; Haine SE; Miljoen H; Vrints CJ; Beutels P; Wouters K; Claeys MJ
EuroIntervention; 2014 Jun; 10(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 24952056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relationship Between Femoral Vascular Closure Devices and Short-Term Mortality From 271 845 Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Procedures Performed in the United Kingdom Between 2006 and 2011: A Propensity Score-Corrected Analysis From the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society.
Farooq V; Goedhart D; Ludman P; de Belder MA; Harcombe A; El-Omar M;
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 27225421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of a vascular closure device versus the radial approach to reduce access site complications in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients: The angio-seal versus the radial approach in acute coronary syndrome trial.
Andrade PB; Mattos LA; Rinaldi FS; Bienert IC; Barbosa RA; Labrunie A; Tebet M; Esteves V; Abizaid A; Sousa AR
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 May; 89(6):976-982. PubMed ID: 27514319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bleeding and vascular complications at the femoral access site following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): an evaluation of hemostasis strategies.
Tavris DR; Wang Y; Jacobs S; Gallauresi B; Curtis J; Messenger J; Resnic FS; Fitzgerald S
J Invasive Cardiol; 2012 Jul; 24(7):328-34. PubMed ID: 22781471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Safety and efficacy of using vascular closure devices for hemostasis on sheath removal after a transfemoral artery percutaneous coronary intervention.
Su SF; Chang MY; Wu MS; Liao YC
Jpn J Nurs Sci; 2019 Apr; 16(2):172-183. PubMed ID: 30044037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Simplified swift and safe vascular closure device deployment without a local arteriogram: Single center experience in 2074 consecutive patients.
Manolis AS; Georgiopoulos G; Stalikas D; Koulouris S
Indian Heart J; 2016; 68(4):529-38. PubMed ID: 27543479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Safety of transradial access compared to transfemoral access with hemostatic devices (vessel plugs and suture devices) after percutaneous coronary interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chugh Y; Bavishi C; Mojadidi MK; Elgendy IY; Faillace RT; Brilakis ES; Tamis-Holland J; Mamas M; Chugh SK
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Aug; 96(2):285-295. PubMed ID: 32521099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of radial, brachial, and femoral accesses using hemostatic devices for percutaneous coronary intervention.
Otsuka M; Shiode N; Nakao Y; Ikegami Y; Kobayashi Y; Takeuchi A; Harima A; Higaki T; Oi K; Dai K; Kawase T; Nakama Y; Suenari K; Nishioka K; Sakai K; Shimatani Y; Masaoka Y; Inoue I
Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2018 Jan; 33(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 27830459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transfemoral approach with systematic use of FemoSeal™ closure device compared to transradial approach in primary angioplasty.
Alonzo A; Rigattieri S; Giovannelli F; Di Russo C; Sciahbasi A; Berni A; Volpe M
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 87(5):849-54. PubMed ID: 26104978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Femoral Vascular Closure Devices and Bleeding, Hemostasis, and Ambulation Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Marquis-Gravel G; Boivin-Proulx LA; Huang Z; Zelenkofske SL; Lincoff AM; Mehran R; Steg PG; Bode C; Alexander JH; Povsic TJ
J Am Heart Assoc; 2023 Jan; 12(1):e025666. PubMed ID: 36583436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Access site complications are uncommon with vascular closure devices or manual compression after lower extremity revascularization.
Cheng TW; Farber A; King EG; Levin SR; Arinze N; Malas MB; Eslami MH; Garg K; Rybin D; Siracuse JJ
J Vasc Surg; 2022 Sep; 76(3):788-796.e2. PubMed ID: 35618194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical outcomes of femoral closure compared to radial compression devices following percutaneous coronary intervention: the FERARI study.
Fastner C; Behnes M; Ünsal M; El-Battrawy I; Ansari U; Mashayekhi K; Hoffmann U; Lang S; Kuschyk J; Borggrefe M; Akin I
Heart Vessels; 2017 May; 32(5):520-530. PubMed ID: 27803954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison Between Radial Approach and Femoral Approach With Vascular Closure Devices on the Occurrence of Access-Site Complications and Periprocedural Bleeding After Percutaneous Coronary Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Rigattieri S; Sciahbasi A; Ratib K; Alonzo A; Cox N; Chodór P; Berni A; Fedele S; Pugliese FR; Cooper CJ; Louvard Y; Nolan J; Rao SV
J Invasive Cardiol; 2016 Dec; 28(12):473-479. PubMed ID: 27630147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rationale and design of a randomised clinical trial comparing vascular closure device and manual compression to achieve haemostasis after diagnostic coronary angiography: the Instrumental Sealing of ARterial puncture site - CLOSURE device versus manual compression (ISAR-CLOSURE) trial.
Xhepa E; Byrne RA; Schulz S; Helde S; Gewalt S; Cassese S; Linhardt M; Ibrahim T; Mehilli J; Hoppe K; Grupp K; Kufner S; Böttiger C; Hoppmann P; Burgdorf C; Fusaro M; Ott I; Schneider S; Hengstenberg C; Schunkert H; Laugwitz KL; Kastrati A;
EuroIntervention; 2014 Jun; 10(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 24952057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of collagen-based vascular closure devices in patients with vs. without severe peripheral artery disease.
Kara K; Kahlert P; Mahabadi AA; Plicht B; Lind AY; Longwitz D; Bollow M; Erbel R
J Endovasc Ther; 2014 Feb; 21(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 24502487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of radial versus femoral access using hemostatic devices following percutaneous coronary intervention.
Rana N; Vijayvergiya R; Kasinadhuni G; Khanal S; Panda P
Indian Heart J; 2021; 73(3):382-384. PubMed ID: 34154763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of vascular closure devices vs manual compression after femoral artery puncture: the ISAR-CLOSURE randomized clinical trial.
Schulz-Schüpke S; Helde S; Gewalt S; Ibrahim T; Linhardt M; Haas K; Hoppe K; Böttiger C; Groha P; Bradaric C; Schmidt R; Bott-Flügel L; Ott I; Goedel J; Byrne RA; Schneider S; Burgdorf C; Morath T; Kufner S; Joner M; Cassese S; Hoppmann P; Hengstenberg C; Pache J; Fusaro M; Massberg S; Mehilli J; Schunkert H; Laugwitz KL; Kastrati A;
JAMA; 2014 Nov; 312(19):1981-7. PubMed ID: 25399273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the FemoSeal Vascular Closure Device With Manual Compression After Femoral Artery Puncture - Post-hoc Analysis of a Large-Scale, Randomized Clinical Trial.
Mankerious N; Mayer K; Gewalt SM; Helde SM; Ibrahim T; Bott-Flügel L; Laugwitz KL; Schunkert H; Kastrati A; Schüpke S;
J Invasive Cardiol; 2018 Jul; 30(7):235-239. PubMed ID: 29760286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Arterial access-site complications after use of a vascular closure device related to puncture height.
Sartorius B; Behnes M; Ünsal M; Hoffmann U; Lang S; Mashayekhi K; Borggrefe M; Akin I
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2017 Feb; 17(1):64. PubMed ID: 28209184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
