These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28851891)

  • 1. Segregating Top-Down Selective Attention from Response Inhibition in a Spatial Cueing Go/NoGo Task: An ERP and Source Localization Study.
    Hong X; Wang Y; Sun J; Li C; Tong S
    Sci Rep; 2017 Aug; 7(1):9662. PubMed ID: 28851891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sequential inhibitory control processes assessed through simultaneous EEG-fMRI.
    Baumeister S; Hohmann S; Wolf I; Plichta MM; Rechtsteiner S; Zangl M; Ruf M; Holz N; Boecker R; Meyer-Lindenberg A; Holtmann M; Laucht M; Banaschewski T; Brandeis D
    Neuroimage; 2014 Jul; 94():349-359. PubMed ID: 24473101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attention-related modulation of frontal midline theta oscillations in cingulate cortex during a spatial cueing Go/NoGo task.
    Hong X; Sun J; Wang J; Li C; Tong S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2020 Feb; 148():1-12. PubMed ID: 31857191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhancing frontal top-down inhibitory control with Go/NoGo training.
    Hartmann L; Sallard E; Spierer L
    Brain Struct Funct; 2016 Sep; 221(7):3835-42. PubMed ID: 26459141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Time course of automatic emotion regulation during a facial Go/Nogo task.
    Zhang W; Lu J
    Biol Psychol; 2012 Feb; 89(2):444-9. PubMed ID: 22200654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A study on the neural mechanism of inhibition of return by the event-related potential in the Go/NoGo task.
    Tian Y; Yao D
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Oct; 79(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 18524452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Age-related spatiotemporal reorganization during response inhibition.
    Hong X; Sun J; Bengson JJ; Tong S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Sep; 93(3):371-80. PubMed ID: 24905017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relationship between ERP components and EEG spatial complexity in a visual Go/Nogo task.
    Jia H; Li H; Yu D
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Jan; 117(1):275-283. PubMed ID: 27784803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of pre-stimulus processing on subsequent events in a warned Go/NoGo paradigm: response preparation, execution and inhibition.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 16214250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Response competition and response inhibition during different choice-discrimination tasks: evidence from ERP measured inside MRI scanner.
    Gonzalez-Rosa JJ; Inuggi A; Blasi V; Cursi M; Annovazzi P; Comi G; Falini A; Leocani L
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 23664841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. fMRI-constrained source analysis reveals early top-down modulations of interference processing using a flanker task.
    Siemann J; Herrmann M; Galashan D
    Neuroimage; 2016 Aug; 136():45-56. PubMed ID: 27181762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: the N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 118(2):343-55. PubMed ID: 17140848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electrophysiological correlates of behavioral response inhibition in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.
    Kim MS; Kim YY; Yoo SY; Kwon JS
    Depress Anxiety; 2007; 24(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 16933318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When 'go' and 'nogo' are equally frequent: ERP components and cortical tomography.
    Lavric A; Pizzagalli DA; Forstmeier S
    Eur J Neurosci; 2004 Nov; 20(9):2483-8. PubMed ID: 15525290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of task complexity on ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks.
    Gajewski PD; Falkenstein M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 22906814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neural and behavioral correlates of selective stopping: Evidence for a different strategy adoption.
    Sánchez-Carmona AJ; Albert J; Hinojosa JA
    Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 139():279-293. PubMed ID: 27355436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrophysiological evidence for the involvement of proactive and reactive control in a rewarded stop-signal task.
    Schevernels H; Bombeke K; Van der Borght L; Hopf JM; Krebs RM; Boehler CN
    Neuroimage; 2015 Nov; 121():115-25. PubMed ID: 26188262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrophysiological correlates for response inhibition in a Go/NoGo task.
    Bokura H; Yamaguchi S; Kobayashi S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Dec; 112(12):2224-32. PubMed ID: 11738192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conflict and inhibition in the cued-Go/NoGo task.
    Randall WM; Smith JL
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Dec; 122(12):2400-7. PubMed ID: 21715225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention.
    Kirmizi-Alsan E; Bayraktaroglu Z; Gurvit H; Keskin YH; Emre M; Demiralp T
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1104(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 16824492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.