179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28852043)
1. Comparison of vaginal microbiota sampling techniques: cytobrush versus swab.
Mitra A; MacIntyre DA; Mahajan V; Lee YS; Smith A; Marchesi JR; Lyons D; Bennett PR; Kyrgiou M
Sci Rep; 2017 Aug; 7(1):9802. PubMed ID: 28852043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative analysis of vaginal microbiota sampling using 16S rRNA gene analysis.
Virtanen S; Kalliala I; Nieminen P; Salonen A
PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181477. PubMed ID: 28723942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of cervical cytobrush sampling on cervico-vaginal immune parameters and microbiota relevant to HIV susceptibility.
Mohammadi A; Bagherichimeh S; Perry MC; Fazel A; Tevlin E; Huibner S; Tharao W; Coburn B; Kaul R
Sci Rep; 2020 May; 10(1):8514. PubMed ID: 32444843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative analysis of vaginal microbiota sampling using menstrual cups and high vaginal swabs in pregnant women living with HIV-1 infection.
Short CS; Quinlan R; Lee YS; Preda VG; Smith A; Marchesi JR; Shattock R; Bennett PR; MacIntyre DA; Taylor GP
Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2023; 13():1190160. PubMed ID: 37228662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Feasibility and acceptability of frequent vaginal self-sampling at home by Rwandan women at high risk of urogenital tract infections.
Verwijs MC; Agaba S; Umulisa MM; van de Wijgert JHHM
Sex Transm Infect; 2022 Feb; 98(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 33514681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of Methods for the Extraction of Microbial DNA From Vaginal Swabs Used for Microbiome Studies.
Mattei V; Murugesan S; Al Hashmi M; Mathew R; James N; Singh P; Kumar M; Lakshmanan AP; Terranegra A; Al Khodor S; Tomei S
Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2019; 9():197. PubMed ID: 31245304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of patient- versus provider-collected vaginal swabs for microbiome analysis during pregnancy.
Wylie KM; Blankenship SA; Tuuli MG; Macones GA; Stout MJ
BMC Res Notes; 2018 Oct; 11(1):706. PubMed ID: 30290831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vaginal Microbiome of Pregnant Indian Women: Insights into the Genome of Dominant Lactobacillus Species.
Mehta O; Ghosh TS; Kothidar A; Gowtham MR; Mitra R; Kshetrapal P; Wadhwa N; Thiruvengadam R; ; Nair GB; Bhatnagar S; Das B
Microb Ecol; 2020 Aug; 80(2):487-499. PubMed ID: 32206831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of an over-the-counter lactic-acid containing intra-vaginal douching product on the vaginal microbiota.
van der Veer C; Bruisten SM; van Houdt R; Matser AA; Tachedjian G; van de Wijgert JHHM; de Vries HJC; van der Helm JJ
BMC Microbiol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):168. PubMed ID: 31345159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Opportunistic screening for Chlamydia trachomatis cervicitis: the value of cytobrush specimens for detection by PCR compared with cell culture.
Wandall DA; Ostergaard L; Overgaard L; Worm AM; Gutschik E
APMIS; 1998 May; 106(5):580-4. PubMed ID: 9674896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sex is associated with the persistence of non-optimal vaginal microbiota following treatment for bacterial vaginosis: a prospective cohort study.
Ratten LK; Plummer EL; Murray GL; Danielewski J; Fairley CK; Garland SM; Hocking JS; Tachedjian G; Chow E; Bradshaw CS; Vodstrcil LA
BJOG; 2021 Mar; 128(4):756-767. PubMed ID: 33480468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimal sampling and analysis methods for clinical diagnostics of vaginal microbiome.
Kero K; Hieta N; Kallonen T; Ahtikoski A; Laine HK; Rautava J; Munukka E
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2023 Feb; 42(2):201-208. PubMed ID: 36624297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of cytobrush and cotton swab sampling for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by cell culture.
Lees MI; Newnan DM; Plackett M; Traynor PW; Forsyth JR; Garland SM
Genitourin Med; 1990 Aug; 66(4):267-9. PubMed ID: 2202656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interplay between the temporal dynamics of the vaginal microbiota and human papillomavirus detection.
Brotman RM; Shardell MD; Gajer P; Tracy JK; Zenilman JM; Ravel J; Gravitt PE
J Infect Dis; 2014 Dec; 210(11):1723-33. PubMed ID: 24943724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the Cytobrush and cotton swabs in sampling cervical cells for filter in situ hybridization detection of human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 DNA.
Peng HQ; Roth P; Caussy D; Rawls W
Acta Cytol; 1988; 32(3):311-3. PubMed ID: 2837033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reproductive tract microbiota of women in childbearing age shifts upon gynecological infections and menstrual cycle.
Cheng L; Gao Y; Xia Q; Wang H; Xie X; Liu Y; Shang H; Diao Y
BMC Microbiol; 2021 Sep; 21(1):252. PubMed ID: 34548031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Association of HPV infection and clearance with cervicovaginal immunology and the vaginal microbiota.
Shannon B; Yi TJ; Perusini S; Gajer P; Ma B; Humphrys MS; Thomas-Pavanel J; Chieza L; Janakiram P; Saunders M; Tharao W; Huibner S; Shahabi K; Ravel J; Rebbapragada A; Kaul R
Mucosal Immunol; 2017 Sep; 10(5):1310-1319. PubMed ID: 28120845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Illumina sequencing 16S rRNA tagging reveals diverse vaginal microbiomes associated with bacterial vaginosis].
Xu S; Zong L; Liu M; He Y; Huang X; Zhou H
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2013 May; 33(5):672-7. PubMed ID: 23688985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomized comparison of vaginal self-sampling by standard vs. dry swabs for human papillomavirus testing.
Eperon I; Vassilakos P; Navarria I; Menoud PA; Gauthier A; Pache JC; Boulvain M; Untiet S; Petignat P
BMC Cancer; 2013 Jul; 13():353. PubMed ID: 23875668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of the Cytobrush for cervical sampling after cryotherapy.
Hoffman MS; Gordy LW; Cavanagh D
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):79-80. PubMed ID: 1994640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
